przykuta at o2
Jun 27, 2008, 8:53 AM
Post #1 of 2
(268 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Tragical dynamics: that run for the number ofarticles
|
|
> > Alas, judging a language edition by Wikimedia Statistics does not work.
>
> Indonesian, Asturian and Volapük WPs have the same "depth" (8), but
> id.WP is a very good WP. How comes? There not so many edits per
> article in id.WP, because it has translated a lot from English. A
> legitimate way to create (good) articles, but it does not need a lot
> of edits.
>
> Bot activity: Indeed, "bot bumps" can often easily be detected in stats tables.
> Especially the small Wikipedias (I suppose) show (relatively) many bot
> activities due to interwiki linking. On the other hand, pseudo
> articles can be created by hand (let a script create it outside WP and
> then insert it "manually").
>
> Ziko
>
Hi Ziko. Standard of article in pl wiki is 1,5 kb (in 2008)
http://tools.wikimedia.pl/~warx/dnb/index.xml
500k is nothing for us, but is good event for PR and only it. If we have good PR we have more new users. I can't see "count obsession" in pl wiki. I se other obsessions - copyvio, POV, vandals, trolls, lack of sources etc. Users in pl wiki know how others look at them. Believe me, we try be better, but our community is not huge.
Przykuta
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
|
