
gerard.meijssen at gmail
Jun 24, 2008, 3:58 PM
Post #31 of 31
(281 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Please REJECT the latin wikinews project. inmediatly
[In reply to]
|
|
Hoi. A straw poll or an angry mob are just that ... what I am looking for are arguments and straw polls nor angry mobs are good at providing them. When good arguments are provided I can be happy. When people want others to do the work and are not willing to be actively involved where needed, then the argument is exceedingly strong against them. Thanks, Gerard On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Jesse Plamondon-Willard < pathoschild [at] gmail> wrote: > Mark Williamson <node.ue [at] gmail> wrote: > > Well then, what do we have to do to show we have a consensus? A straw > > poll? Or do we need an angry mob? > > Both are traditional indications of community consensus. > > -- > Yours cordially, > Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild) > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l [at] lists > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l [at] lists Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
|