
jhsoby at gmail
Jun 8, 2008, 6:16 AM
Post #6 of 8
(150 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: nlwiki has more spoken articles then enwiki
[In reply to]
|
|
I believe it was a joke, Gerard. A [[tongue-in-cheek]] one. 2008/6/8, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com>: > Hoi, > I do not know how to appreciate this. Why would anyone be proud of the > number ar arbitration cases ? Are you implying that the English language > arbitration system is broken ?? > Thanks, > GerardM > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Kalan <kalan.001[at]gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2008/6/8, effe iets anders <effeietsanders[at]gmail.com>: >> > Finally, we've beaten them with something ;-) >> >> If there is something that enwiki is beatable by, it's an overall >> number of arbitration requests ;) We (Russian Wikipedia) currently >> have 350, I believe it's way more than in any other wiki. >> >> — Kalan >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- Jon Harald Søby http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
|