Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Wikipedia: Foundation

Board elections: Statistics

 

 

Wikipedia foundation RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


pathoschild at gmail

Jun 5, 2008, 6:21 PM

Post #1 of 20 (289 views)
Permalink
Board elections: Statistics

Hello,

There have been a few requests for board election statistics, so here
they are (but no early results). The vote statistics are generated by
a public script<http://pathos.ca/tools/wmelections>, and the eligible
voter statistics are generated by a private script. The vote
statistics will be included in the weekly report from now on, and more
extensive statistics can be found on
<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pathoschild/Board_elections_statistics>.

==Current votes==
1185 valid votes (plus 97 votes replaced by a later vote, and 3 votes
struck by the committee).

===Valid votes by date===
1 June 2008 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++354
2 June 2008 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++397
3 June 2008 +++++++++++++++++172
4 June 2008 ++++++++++++122
5 June 2008 +++++++++++++134

===Valid votes by language===
en ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++500
de ++++++++++++++146
he +++++++73
ru ++++++60
es +++++55
zh +++++51
fr ++++48
nl ++++47
mul +++33
it +++32
fi ++25
pl +15
pt 9
cs 8
sr 8
id 7
ar 6
uk 6
no 6
el 6
ko 5
bg 5
ca 4
ja 3
fa 3
sv 3
lt 2
sw 1
jv 1
km 1
la 1
vi 1
hi 1
is 1
nds 1
ro 1
zh_yue 1
bn 1
kk 1
eo 1
hu 1
bar 1
ml 1
zh_classical 1
tl 1
mr 1

==Eligible voters==
===Number of eligible voters===
* 31900 user accounts meet the edit requirements;
* —24251 accounts are eligible (neither indefblocked nor bot) and have
an email address set;
* —21804 unique addresses.

===Number of eligible voters by primary language===
en 9108
de 2583
fr 1424
ja 947
it 864
es 861
pl 646
ru 600
nl 498
zh 428
pt 372
sv 323
he 272
fi 227
hu 202
no 166
cs 151
tr 130
ca 100
ko 95
ar 85
da 82
ro 78
uk 72
bg 68
sr 61
fa 60
lt 56
th 56
el 54
hr 49
id 48
eo 42
sk 42
gl 32
et 30
sl 28
is 24
ms 24
nn 22
ka 21
la 21
lv 19
ml 19
bs 17
mk 16
vi 15
eu 14
ta 14
br 13
sq 13
az 12
be_x_old 12
te 12
ur 12
af 11
lb 11
bn 10
oc 10
cy 9
hi 9
vls 8
bar 7
mr 7
an 6
be 6
fy 6
ga 6
ku 6
pms 6
tl 6
uz 6
als 5
ast 5
hy 5
kk 5
kn 5
li 5
scn 5
su 5
yi 5
zh_yue 5
bat_smg 4
mt 4
zh_min_nan 4
cv 3
fo 3
fur 3
ia 3
io 3
nah 3
nds_nl 3
pam 3
rm 3
sh 3
sw 3
tg 3
am 2
ang 2
ba 2
csb 2
diq 2
dv 2
fiu_vro 2
gd 2
glk 2
hsb 2
km 2
mn 2
nap 2
nds 2
ne 2
ps 2
qu 2
si 2
vec 2
vo 2
wuu 2
yo 2
bpy 1
cdo 1
ce 1
ceb 1
co 1
cu 1
eml 1
ext 1
frp 1
gv 1
ht 1
ig 1
ilo 1
iu 1
jv 1
ksh 1
ky 1
lad 1
lij 1
lmo 1
lo 1
mi 1
myv 1
new 1
nov 1
nrm 1
om 1
os 1
pag 1
roa_rup 1
sc 1
sco 1
sd 1
stq 1
to 1
udm 1
wa 1
war 1
wo 1
zea 1
zh_classical 1
<unknown> 251 (only eligible from a multilingual wiki)

==See also==
* detailed information: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2008/en>
* ask a question: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Board_elections/2008>
* previous reports:
- April 26 - May 3:
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation/29567>
- May 3-10: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation/29783>
- May 10-18: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation/30134>
- May 18-25: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation/30323>
- May 25 - June 04:
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.wikimedia.foundation/30677>

--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


jayvdb at gmail

Jun 5, 2008, 6:31 PM

Post #2 of 20 (285 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

2008/6/6 Jesse Plamondon-Willard <pathoschild[at]gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> There have been a few requests for board election statistics, so here
> they are (but no early results). The vote statistics are generated by
> a public script<http://pathos.ca/tools/wmelections>, and the eligible
> voter statistics are generated by a private script. The vote
> statistics will be included in the weekly report from now on, and more
> extensive statistics can be found on
> <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pathoschild/Board_elections_statistics>.

Any chance we can see stats grouped by project rather than by language?

--
John

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


gmaxwell at gmail

Jun 5, 2008, 7:27 PM

Post #3 of 20 (280 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:31 PM, John Vandenberg <jayvdb[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Any chance we can see stats grouped by project rather than by language?

Yes. Well kinda.

I quickly re-ran my stats script from last election:

http://toolserver.org/~gmaxwell/election_analysis/2008/GRAPH_3_totals.png
http://toolserver.org/~gmaxwell/election_analysis/2008/GRAPH_4_turnouts.png

My turnout numbers there are of dubious quality at the moment, since I
haven't gone through the full effort of making sure I've correctly
applied the current criteria. .. also the HTML of the voter list
changed.. as a result I haven't bothered generating the full output
(http://toolserver.org/~gmaxwell/election_analysis/ivote3/graphs.html).

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


pathoschild at gmail

Jun 5, 2008, 7:38 PM

Post #4 of 20 (279 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

John Vandenberg <jayvdb[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Any chance we can see stats grouped by project rather than by language?

Nope.

==Votes by project==
wikipedia ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1119
wikinews +17
meta +16
commons +15
wiktionary +13
wikisource 7
wikibooks 6
wikiquote 3
wikiversity 3
mediawiki 1
incubator 1

==Votes by wiki==
en +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++513
de ++++++++++++++146
he +++++++73
ru ++++++60
es +++++56
zh +++++51
fr ++++48
nl ++++47
mul +++33
it +++32
fi ++25
pl +15
pt +10
cs 8
sr 8
el 7
id 7
ar 6
uk 6
no 6
bg 5
ko 5
ca 4
fa 3
ja 3
sv 3
lt 2
jv 1
hi 1
la 1
sw 1
is 1
ro 1
vi 1
km 1
nds 1
zh_yue 1
bn 1
kk 1
eo 1
hu 1
bar 1
ml 1
zh_classical 1
tl 1
mr 1

--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


pathoschild at gmail

Jun 5, 2008, 7:45 PM

Post #5 of 20 (279 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

Oops, this is the correct votes-by-wiki data.

==Votes by wiki==
enwiki ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++486
dewiki ++++++++++++++144
hewiki +++++++72
ruwiki +++++59
eswiki +++++54
zhwiki +++++50
nlwiki ++++47
frwiki ++++42
itwiki ++29
fiwiki ++25
metawiki +16
commonswiki +15
plwiki +14
enwikinews +13
ptwiki 9
cswiki 8
srwiki 8
enwiktionary 7
idwiki 7
ukwiki 6
nowiki 6
arwiki 6
elwiki 6
bgwiki 5
kowiki 5
enwikibooks 4
cawiki 3
fawiki 3
jawiki 3
frwikiversity 2
itwikinews 2
svwiki 2
ltwiki 2
enwikisource 2
dewiktionary 1
enwikiversity 1
rowiki 1
swwiki 1
jvwiki 1
incubatorwiki 1
cawikisource 1
mediawikiwiki 1
svwiktionary 1
ndswiki 1
ruwiktionary 1
viwiki 1
frwikisource 1
lawiki 1
hiwiki 1
kkwiki 1
iswiktionary 1
plwikinews 1
ptwikinews 1
kmwiki 1
eswikisource 1
bnwiki 1
eswikiquote 1
tlwiki 1
barwiki 1
frwiktionary 1
frwikibooks 1
hewikisource 1
frwikiquote 1
zh_yuewiki 1
zhwikisource 1
mrwiki 1
huwiki 1
eowiki 1
mlwiki 1
dewikibooks 1
elwiktionary 1
zh_classicalwiki 1
itwikiquote 1


--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


andreengels at gmail

Jun 5, 2008, 10:51 PM

Post #6 of 20 (276 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

2008/6/6 Jesse Plamondon-Willard <pathoschild[at]gmail.com>:

> ==Current votes==
> 1185 valid votes (plus 97 votes replaced by a later vote, and 3 votes
> struck by the committee).

Can you give an indication as to why these 3 votes were struck?

> ===Valid votes by language===

Turnout by language (top 31 language in number of eligible voters).
All numbers are approximate because people could have voted from
another than their first language.

he 73/272 (26.8%)
id 7/48 (14.6%)
sr 8/61 (13.1%)
zh 51/428 (11.9%)
el 6/54 (11.1%)
fi 225/227 (11.0%)
ru 60/600 (10.0%)
nl 47/498 (9.4%)
uk 6/72 (8.3%)
bg 5/68 (7.4%)
ar 6/85 (7.1%)
es 55/861 (6.4%)
de 146/2583 (5.7%)
en 500/9108 (5.5%)
cs 8/151 (5.3%)
ko 5/95 (5.3%)
fa 3/60 (5.0%)
ca 4/100 (4.0%)
it 32/864 (3.7%)
no 6/166 (3.6%)
fr 48/1424 (3.4%)
pt 9/372 (2.4%)
pl 15/646 (2.3%)
sv 3/323 (0.9%)
hu 1/202 (0.5%)
ja 3/947 (0.3%)
hr 0/49 (0.0%)
th 0/56 (0.0%)
ro 0/78 (0.0%)
da 0/82 (0.0%)
tr 0/130 (0.0%)

Total turnout 1185/21804 = 5.4%

--
Andre Engels, andreengels[at]gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


ultrablue at gmail

Jun 6, 2008, 12:26 AM

Post #7 of 20 (275 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

2008/6/6 Andre Engels <andreengels[at]gmail.com>:
> Can you give an indication as to why these 3 votes were struck?

One was a vote by me, to test if voting was actually finally working.
Once it worked, I struck it myself. The other two votes were people
who voted again from a different wiki, instead of on the same wiki
they originally voted on (in which case it would have automatically
greyed out/discounted the prior votes).

~Mark Ryan

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


shimgray at gmail

Jun 6, 2008, 2:16 AM

Post #8 of 20 (276 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

2008/6/6 Jesse Plamondon-Willard <pathoschild[at]gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> There have been a few requests for board election statistics, so here
> they are (but no early results).

Somewhat unrelatedly - I got my "remember to vote" email this morning.
Glad to see they're going out!

--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray[at]dunelm.org.uk

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


szilagyi at gmail

Jun 7, 2008, 10:44 AM

Post #9 of 20 (254 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

2008/6/5 Jesse Plamondon-Willard <pathoschild[at]gmail.com>:

> ==Current votes==
> 1185 valid votes (plus 97 votes replaced by a later vote, and 3 votes
> struck by the committee).
>
>
What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?

And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why their vote
was struck? If not on either of these two, why?

- Joe
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


cbrown1023.ml at gmail

Jun 7, 2008, 11:11 AM

Post #10 of 20 (254 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
>
> And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why their vote
> was struck? If not on either of these two, why?

Mark responded to this yesterday:

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Mark Ryan <ultrablue[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/6/6 Andre Engels <andreengels[at]gmail.com>:
>> Can you give an indication as to why these 3 votes were struck?
>
> One was a vote by me, to test if voting was actually finally working.
> Once it worked, I struck it myself. The other two votes were people
> who voted again from a different wiki, instead of on the same wiki
> they originally voted on (in which case it would have automatically
> greyed out/discounted the prior votes).
>
> ~Mark Ryan
>

--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


szilagyi at gmail

Jun 7, 2008, 2:56 PM

Post #11 of 20 (252 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml[at]gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
> >
> > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why their
> vote
> > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
>
> Mark responded to this yesterday:
>


I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some other
reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is to be
notified?

- Joe
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


jhsoby at gmail

Jun 7, 2008, 3:52 PM

Post #12 of 20 (252 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

Yes, they are.

2008/6/7 Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>:

> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
> > >
> > > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why their
> > vote
> > > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
> >
> > Mark responded to this yesterday:
> >
>
>
> I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some other
> reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is to be
> notified?
>
> - Joe
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



--
Jon Harald Søby
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


aphaia at gmail

Jun 8, 2008, 3:32 AM

Post #13 of 20 (243 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

I'm a bit concerned Japanese low (lowest ever since 2004) and gave a
look to Japanese setting (note: my home wiki is meta and I use English
settings for convenience in communications with the other meta
regular).

I let some Eleccom members the problems I found, but one of them are
noted worthy publicly, for warning other language setting problem. So
sorry for duplications, if any.

Japanese setting says "the Election 2008 is over" and has no
instruction of voting method. No mention people are expected to rank
candidates. I am amazed three people had voted even in this
circumstance...

If you are good at your language and English, please check Boardvote:*
to see they are rightly translated.

(That is partly why I am no big fan of betawiki way: translation out
of context is sometimes disastrous confusing .. like the above).

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, they are.
>
> 2008/6/7 Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml[at]gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
>> > >
>> > > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why their
>> > vote
>> > > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
>> >
>> > Mark responded to this yesterday:
>> >
>>
>>
>> I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some other
>> reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is to be
>> notified?
>>
>> - Joe
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jon Harald Søby
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



--
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


gerard.meijssen at gmail

Jun 8, 2008, 4:04 AM

Post #14 of 20 (243 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

Hoi,
When you localise in Betawiki, you are provided with messages in English
that provide you the context of the message. When you localise outside
Betawiki such help is not available. I would argue that you should localise
in Betawiki because it helps you with the context. When these messages are
missing, it is only because nobody bothered to add them.

When you have suggestions to make Betawiki even better, we do welcome them.

What we are looking for is more people that contribute to the localisation
process, certainly for a big language like Japanese it should be possible
not only to do the initial localisation but also to do the proof reading and
improve the available localisations.

One question, when you found the localisation lacking, you do know how this
can be remedied, don't you !?!
Thanks,
GerardM

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm a bit concerned Japanese low (lowest ever since 2004) and gave a
> look to Japanese setting (note: my home wiki is meta and I use English
> settings for convenience in communications with the other meta
> regular).
>
> I let some Eleccom members the problems I found, but one of them are
> noted worthy publicly, for warning other language setting problem. So
> sorry for duplications, if any.
>
> Japanese setting says "the Election 2008 is over" and has no
> instruction of voting method. No mention people are expected to rank
> candidates. I am amazed three people had voted even in this
> circumstance...
>
> If you are good at your language and English, please check Boardvote:*
> to see they are rightly translated.
>
> (That is partly why I am no big fan of betawiki way: translation out
> of context is sometimes disastrous confusing .. like the above).
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, they are.
> >
> > 2008/6/7 Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml[at]gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
> >> > >
> >> > > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why
> their
> >> > vote
> >> > > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
> >> >
> >> > Mark responded to this yesterday:
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some other
> >> reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is to be
> >> notified?
> >>
> >> - Joe
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jon Harald Søby
> > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>
>
> --
> KIZU Naoko
> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


aphaia at gmail

Jun 8, 2008, 4:16 AM

Post #15 of 20 (243 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> When you localise in Betawiki, you are provided with messages in English
> that provide you the context of the message. When you localise outside
> Betawiki such help is not available. I would argue that you should localise
> in Betawiki because it helps you with the context. When these messages are
> missing, it is only because nobody bothered to add them.

Sorry disagree. When I am on Betawiki, I see only English MediaWiki
files, not knowing where I will find it on a real wiki. It doesn't
give us context.
>
> When you have suggestions to make Betawiki even better, we do welcome them.
>
> What we are looking for is more people that contribute to the localisation
> process, certainly for a big language like Japanese it should be possible
> not only to do the initial localisation but also to do the proof reading and
> improve the available localisations.
>
> One question, when you found the localisation lacking, you do know how this
> can be remedied, don't you !?!

Why? I see only messages without knowing which MediaWiki file contains
that. Why do you think I know something?

Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit concerned Japanese low (lowest ever since 2004) and gave a
>> look to Japanese setting (note: my home wiki is meta and I use English
>> settings for convenience in communications with the other meta
>> regular).
>>
>> I let some Eleccom members the problems I found, but one of them are
>> noted worthy publicly, for warning other language setting problem. So
>> sorry for duplications, if any.
>>
>> Japanese setting says "the Election 2008 is over" and has no
>> instruction of voting method. No mention people are expected to rank
>> candidates. I am amazed three people had voted even in this
>> circumstance...
>>
>> If you are good at your language and English, please check Boardvote:*
>> to see they are rightly translated.
>>
>> (That is partly why I am no big fan of betawiki way: translation out
>> of context is sometimes disastrous confusing .. like the above).
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Yes, they are.
>> >
>> > 2008/6/7 Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml[at]gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why
>> their
>> >> > vote
>> >> > > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
>> >> >
>> >> > Mark responded to this yesterday:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some other
>> >> reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is to be
>> >> notified?
>> >>
>> >> - Joe
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> foundation-l mailing list
>> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jon Harald Søby
>> > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > foundation-l mailing list
>> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> KIZU Naoko
>> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
>> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



--
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


gerard.meijssen at gmail

Jun 8, 2008, 4:35 AM

Post #16 of 20 (243 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

Hoi,
Change your language in your user preferences to Japanese and Betawiki is
not that English anymore.. When you hit the "Translate" button that can be
found in the sidebar, you will go immediately to the Japanese translation
track. The Betawiki software itself has been locaised into Japanese..
Betawiki IS a real MediaWiki wiki so it gives you context. I fail to see
your point.

The MediaWiki messages pop up from within the software.. The annotations
help understand the context. Without these annotations localisation is
indeed much more difficult and it is this what is offered in Betawiki only.
Once the localisation is done, the message do become available everywhere,
another advantage that you have nowhere else..

As all other projects, the localisation at Betawiki is done by well meaning
volunteers. We are happy with the work that is done but this does not imply
that it is as good as we would like to have it. To illustrate this point
look at the "group statistics" and you will notice how much work still needs
to be done for a first time. You will notice how much work needs to be done
for Japanese... When you state that the quality is not good enough for
Japanese, I will be the last to deny this. I will however be among the
people that will implore you to do the wiki thing and fix it.
Thanks,
GerardM


http://translatewiki.net/wiki/Translating:Group_statistics

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > When you localise in Betawiki, you are provided with messages in English
> > that provide you the context of the message. When you localise outside
> > Betawiki such help is not available. I would argue that you should
> localise
> > in Betawiki because it helps you with the context. When these messages
> are
> > missing, it is only because nobody bothered to add them.
>
> Sorry disagree. When I am on Betawiki, I see only English MediaWiki
> files, not knowing where I will find it on a real wiki. It doesn't
> give us context.
> >
> > When you have suggestions to make Betawiki even better, we do welcome
> them.
> >
> > What we are looking for is more people that contribute to the
> localisation
> > process, certainly for a big language like Japanese it should be possible
> > not only to do the initial localisation but also to do the proof reading
> and
> > improve the available localisations.
> >
> > One question, when you found the localisation lacking, you do know how
> this
> > can be remedied, don't you !?!
>
> Why? I see only messages without knowing which MediaWiki file contains
> that. Why do you think I know something?
>
> Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm a bit concerned Japanese low (lowest ever since 2004) and gave a
> >> look to Japanese setting (note: my home wiki is meta and I use English
> >> settings for convenience in communications with the other meta
> >> regular).
> >>
> >> I let some Eleccom members the problems I found, but one of them are
> >> noted worthy publicly, for warning other language setting problem. So
> >> sorry for duplications, if any.
> >>
> >> Japanese setting says "the Election 2008 is over" and has no
> >> instruction of voting method. No mention people are expected to rank
> >> candidates. I am amazed three people had voted even in this
> >> circumstance...
> >>
> >> If you are good at your language and English, please check Boardvote:*
> >> to see they are rightly translated.
> >>
> >> (That is partly why I am no big fan of betawiki way: translation out
> >> of context is sometimes disastrous confusing .. like the above).
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Yes, they are.
> >> >
> >> > 2008/6/7 Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml@
> gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why
> >> their
> >> >> > vote
> >> >> > > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Mark responded to this yesterday:
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some other
> >> >> reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is to
> be
> >> >> notified?
> >> >>
> >> >> - Joe
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> >> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jon Harald Søby
> >> > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > foundation-l mailing list
> >> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> KIZU Naoko
> >> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
> >> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>
>
> --
> KIZU Naoko
> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


aphaia at gmail

Jun 8, 2008, 6:08 AM

Post #17 of 20 (242 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,
> Change your language in your user preferences to Japanese and Betawiki is
> not that English anymore..
> When you hit the "Translate" button that can be
> found in the sidebar, you will go immediately to the Japanese translation
> track.

True and what is it relevant for me to find which media wiki message
contains a particular message on a wiki? How many minites or hours
should I afford? I think I know the better way to spend my time.
Thanks.



The Betawiki software itself has been locaised into Japanese..
> Betawiki IS a real MediaWiki wiki so it gives you context. I fail to see
> your point.
>
> The MediaWiki messages pop up from within the software.. The annotations
> help understand the context. Without these annotations localisation is
> indeed much more difficult and it is this what is offered in Betawiki only.
> Once the localisation is done, the message do become available everywhere,
> another advantage that you have nowhere else..
>
> As all other projects, the localisation at Betawiki is done by well meaning
> volunteers. We are happy with the work that is done but this does not imply
> that it is as good as we would like to have it. To illustrate this point
> look at the "group statistics" and you will notice how much work still needs
> to be done for a first time. You will notice how much work needs to be done
> for Japanese... When you state that the quality is not good enough for
> Japanese, I will be the last to deny this. I will however be among the
> people that will implore you to do the wiki thing and fix it.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>
> http://translatewiki.net/wiki/Translating:Group_statistics
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Gerard Meijssen
>> <gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hoi,
>> > When you localise in Betawiki, you are provided with messages in English
>> > that provide you the context of the message. When you localise outside
>> > Betawiki such help is not available. I would argue that you should
>> localise
>> > in Betawiki because it helps you with the context. When these messages
>> are
>> > missing, it is only because nobody bothered to add them.
>>
>> Sorry disagree. When I am on Betawiki, I see only English MediaWiki
>> files, not knowing where I will find it on a real wiki. It doesn't
>> give us context.
>> >
>> > When you have suggestions to make Betawiki even better, we do welcome
>> them.
>> >
>> > What we are looking for is more people that contribute to the
>> localisation
>> > process, certainly for a big language like Japanese it should be possible
>> > not only to do the initial localisation but also to do the proof reading
>> and
>> > improve the available localisations.
>> >
>> > One question, when you found the localisation lacking, you do know how
>> this
>> > can be remedied, don't you !?!
>>
>> Why? I see only messages without knowing which MediaWiki file contains
>> that. Why do you think I know something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> > GerardM
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm a bit concerned Japanese low (lowest ever since 2004) and gave a
>> >> look to Japanese setting (note: my home wiki is meta and I use English
>> >> settings for convenience in communications with the other meta
>> >> regular).
>> >>
>> >> I let some Eleccom members the problems I found, but one of them are
>> >> noted worthy publicly, for warning other language setting problem. So
>> >> sorry for duplications, if any.
>> >>
>> >> Japanese setting says "the Election 2008 is over" and has no
>> >> instruction of voting method. No mention people are expected to rank
>> >> candidates. I am amazed three people had voted even in this
>> >> circumstance...
>> >>
>> >> If you are good at your language and English, please check Boardvote:*
>> >> to see they are rightly translated.
>> >>
>> >> (That is partly why I am no big fan of betawiki way: translation out
>> >> of context is sometimes disastrous confusing .. like the above).
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby[at]gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Yes, they are.
>> >> >
>> >> > 2008/6/7 Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml@
>> gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told why
>> >> their
>> >> >> > vote
>> >> >> > > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Mark responded to this yesterday:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some other
>> >> >> reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is to
>> be
>> >> >> notified?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Joe
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> foundation-l mailing list
>> >> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> >> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Jon Harald Søby
>> >> > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > foundation-l mailing list
>> >> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> > Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> KIZU Naoko
>> >> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
>> >> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> foundation-l mailing list
>> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > foundation-l mailing list
>> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> KIZU Naoko
>> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
>> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



--
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


gerard.meijssen at gmail

Jun 8, 2008, 6:23 AM

Post #18 of 20 (242 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

Hoi,
There are two two groups of messages.. there are the "MediaWiki messages"
and there are the "All extensions" messages. This is where you find your
message. It is not that difficult to find something .. Now, spending some
minutes or hours on Betawiki helps everyone who speaks your language this is
why it is time well spend.
Thanks,
GerardM

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > Change your language in your user preferences to Japanese and Betawiki is
> > not that English anymore..
> > When you hit the "Translate" button that can be
> > found in the sidebar, you will go immediately to the Japanese translation
> > track.
>
> True and what is it relevant for me to find which media wiki message
> contains a particular message on a wiki? How many minites or hours
> should I afford? I think I know the better way to spend my time.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> The Betawiki software itself has been locaised into Japanese..
> > Betawiki IS a real MediaWiki wiki so it gives you context. I fail to see
> > your point.
> >
> > The MediaWiki messages pop up from within the software.. The annotations
> > help understand the context. Without these annotations localisation is
> > indeed much more difficult and it is this what is offered in Betawiki
> only.
> > Once the localisation is done, the message do become available
> everywhere,
> > another advantage that you have nowhere else..
> >
> > As all other projects, the localisation at Betawiki is done by well
> meaning
> > volunteers. We are happy with the work that is done but this does not
> imply
> > that it is as good as we would like to have it. To illustrate this point
> > look at the "group statistics" and you will notice how much work still
> needs
> > to be done for a first time. You will notice how much work needs to be
> done
> > for Japanese... When you state that the quality is not good enough for
> > Japanese, I will be the last to deny this. I will however be among the
> > people that will implore you to do the wiki thing and fix it.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> >
> > http://translatewiki.net/wiki/Translating:Group_statistics
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> >> <gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hoi,
> >> > When you localise in Betawiki, you are provided with messages in
> English
> >> > that provide you the context of the message. When you localise outside
> >> > Betawiki such help is not available. I would argue that you should
> >> localise
> >> > in Betawiki because it helps you with the context. When these messages
> >> are
> >> > missing, it is only because nobody bothered to add them.
> >>
> >> Sorry disagree. When I am on Betawiki, I see only English MediaWiki
> >> files, not knowing where I will find it on a real wiki. It doesn't
> >> give us context.
> >> >
> >> > When you have suggestions to make Betawiki even better, we do welcome
> >> them.
> >> >
> >> > What we are looking for is more people that contribute to the
> >> localisation
> >> > process, certainly for a big language like Japanese it should be
> possible
> >> > not only to do the initial localisation but also to do the proof
> reading
> >> and
> >> > improve the available localisations.
> >> >
> >> > One question, when you found the localisation lacking, you do know how
> >> this
> >> > can be remedied, don't you !?!
> >>
> >> Why? I see only messages without knowing which MediaWiki file contains
> >> that. Why do you think I know something?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> > GerardM
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'm a bit concerned Japanese low (lowest ever since 2004) and gave a
> >> >> look to Japanese setting (note: my home wiki is meta and I use
> English
> >> >> settings for convenience in communications with the other meta
> >> >> regular).
> >> >>
> >> >> I let some Eleccom members the problems I found, but one of them are
> >> >> noted worthy publicly, for warning other language setting problem. So
> >> >> sorry for duplications, if any.
> >> >>
> >> >> Japanese setting says "the Election 2008 is over" and has no
> >> >> instruction of voting method. No mention people are expected to rank
> >> >> candidates. I am amazed three people had voted even in this
> >> >> circumstance...
> >> >>
> >> >> If you are good at your language and English, please check
> Boardvote:*
> >> >> to see they are rightly translated.
> >> >>
> >> >> (That is partly why I am no big fan of betawiki way: translation out
> >> >> of context is sometimes disastrous confusing .. like the above).
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby[at]gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Yes, they are.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2008/6/7 Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi[at]gmail.com>:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Casey Brown <cbrown1023.ml@
> >> gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Joe Szilagyi <
> szilagyi[at]gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > > What qualifies a vote to be struck or discounted?
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > > And, how are the users affected thus notified? Are they told
> why
> >> >> their
> >> >> >> > vote
> >> >> >> > > was struck? If not on either of these two, why?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Mark responded to this yesterday:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I noticed that afterwards, sorry. I'm still curious if for some
> other
> >> >> >> reason, if votes are struck, if the person whose vote is struck is
> to
> >> be
> >> >> >> notified?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> - Joe
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> >> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> >> >> Unsubscribe:
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Jon Harald Søby
> >> >> > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > foundation-l mailing list
> >> >> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> >> > Unsubscribe:
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> KIZU Naoko
> >> >> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
> >> >> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> >> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > foundation-l mailing list
> >> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> KIZU Naoko
> >> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
> >> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>
>
> --
> KIZU Naoko
> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
> Quote of the Day (English): http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


jhsoby at gmail

Jun 8, 2008, 6:46 AM

Post #19 of 20 (242 views)
Permalink
Re: Board elections: Statistics [In reply to]

Finding the right message can take for ever if you don't know the
right way. I'll write a small tutorial on how to do that next week
(I'll be on a military exercise this week unfortunately), and then
you'll know how to do it. :-)

2008/6/8, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hoi,
>> Change your language in your user preferences to Japanese and Betawiki is
>> not that English anymore..
>> When you hit the "Translate" button that can be
>> found in the sidebar, you will go immediately to the Japanese translation
>> track.
>
> True and what is it relevant for me to find which media wiki message
> contains a particular message on a wiki? How many minites or hours
> should I afford? I think I know the better way to spend my time.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> The Betawiki software itself has been locaised into Japanese..
>> Betawiki IS a real MediaWiki wiki so it gives you context. I fail to see
>> your point.
>>
>> The MediaWiki messages pop up from within the software.. The annotations
>> help understand the context. Without these annotations localisation is
>> indeed much more difficult and it is this what is offered in Betawiki
>> only.
>> Once the localisation is done, the message do become available everywhere,
>> another advantage that you have nowhere else..
>>
>> As all other projects, the localisation at Betawiki is done by well
>> meaning
>> volunteers. We are happy with the work that is done but this does not
>> imply
>> that it is as good as we would like to have it. To illustrate this point
>> look at the "group statistics" and you will notice how much work still
>> needs
>> to be done for a first time. You will notice how much work needs to be
>> done
>> for Japanese... When you state that the quality is not good enough for
>> Japanese, I will be the last to deny this. I will however be among the
>> people that will implore you to do the wiki thing and fix it.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>>
>> http://translatewiki.net/wiki/Translating:Group_statistics
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Aphaia <aphaia[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Gerard Meijssen
>>> <gerard.meijssen[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hoi,
>>> > When you localise in Betawiki, you are provided with messages in
>>> > English
>>> > that provide you the context of the message. When you localise outside
>>> > Betawiki such help is not available. I would argue that you should
>>> localise
>>> > in Betawiki because it helps you with the context. When these messages
>>> are
>>> > missing, it is only because nobody bothered to add them.
>>>
>>> Sorry disagree. When I am on Betawiki, I see only English MediaWiki
>>> files, not knowing where I will find it on a real wiki. It doesn't
>>> give us context.
>>> >
>>> > When you have suggestions to make Betawiki even better, we do welcome
>>> them.
>>> >
>>> > What we are looking for is more people that contribute to the
>>> localisation
>>> > process, certainly for a big language like Japanese it should be
>>> > possible
>>> > not only to do the initial localisation but also to do the proof
>>> > reading
>>> and
>>> > improve the available localisations.
>>> >
>>> > One question, when you found the localisation lacking, you do know how
>>> this
>>> > can be remedied, don't you !?!
>>>
>>> Why? I see only messages without knowing which MediaWiki file contains
>>> that. Why do you think I know something?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> > GerardM
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Aphaia <ap