Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Wikipedia: Foundation

Re: Request to allow Google to search list archivesagain

 

 

Wikipedia foundation RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


philippebeaudette at gmail

Apr 27, 2008, 12:39 PM

Post #1 of 3 (419 views)
Permalink
Re: Request to allow Google to search list archivesagain

To my mind, the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks, unless
someone can create an argument that hasn't occurred to me yet (which is not
un-likely, since this isn't a question I've pondered in great depth).

Philippe

--------------------------------------------------
From: "David Goodman" <dgoodmanny[at]gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 2:01 PM
To: <birgitte_sb[at]yahoo.com>; "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
<foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Request to allow Google to search list
archivesagain

> absolutely no. G already indexes much too many of the incidental
> discussions at WP.
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb[at]yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> I support this especially as url's to old messages are not stable. An
>> effective search is greatly needed. I have spent a long time on occasion
>> for searching for things I am certain exist and came up with nothing.
>>
>> Birgitte SB
>>
>>
>> --- On Sun, 4/27/08, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Michael Bimmler <mbimmler[at]gmail.com>
>> > Subject: [Foundation-l] Request to allow Google to search list
>> archives again
>> > To: "Wikimedia developers" <wikitech-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org>
>> > Cc: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
>> <foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org>
>> > Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008, 12:30 PM
>>
>>
>> > [courtesy copy to foundation-l, though I suggest that
>> > discussion, if any, be
>> > centralised on wikitech-l]
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> > the search index for the mailinglist archives was last
>> > rebuilt in January.
>> > Now, after having made quite a few queries about this here
>> > and at other
>> > places, I learnt (and obviously had to accept) that
>> > rebuilding the search
>> > index is quite a resources-consuming process which resulted
>> > in crashes.
>> >
>> > To put it bluntly, I dare suggest from a non-technical POV
>> > that the "htdig"
>> > (that's the name, isn't it?) experiment has failed.
>> > If we can only update
>> > our search index every 6 months or so, it is pointless to
>> > have it.
>> >
>> > Instead, I suggest that
>> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/robots.txt be modified as
>> > to allow Google (and other search engines) to crawl
>> > /pipermail/ again. I do
>> > not really see the privacy issues of this, nabble, gmane
>> > etc. are
>> > google-searchable as well and I really don't see the
>> > point in barring Google
>> > from our own archive.
>> >
>> > If I am very honest, I do not even remember anymore, why we
>> > decided to bar
>> > Google from http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail.
>> > Was it due to privacy concerns? If so, which, and why is
>> > lists.wikimedia.orgas an archive different from
>> > Nabble/Gmane?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Michael
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Michael Bimmler
>> > mbimmler[at]gmail.com
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > foundation-l mailing list
>> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> Be a better friend, newshound, and
>> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


dgoodmanny at gmail

Apr 27, 2008, 8:54 PM

Post #2 of 3 (371 views)
Permalink
Re: Request to allow Google to search list archivesagain [In reply to]

Its an open list--if they join it, they can search it.

On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Philippe Beaudette
<philippebeaudette[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> To my mind, the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks, unless
> someone can create an argument that hasn't occurred to me yet (which is not
> un-likely, since this isn't a question I've pondered in great depth).
>
> Philippe
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "David Goodman" <dgoodmanny[at]gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 2:01 PM
> To: <birgitte_sb[at]yahoo.com>; "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
>
> <foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Request to allow Google to search list
>
>
> archivesagain
>
> > absolutely no. G already indexes much too many of the incidental
> > discussions at WP.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb[at]yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >> I support this especially as url's to old messages are not stable. An
> >> effective search is greatly needed. I have spent a long time on occasion
> >> for searching for things I am certain exist and came up with nothing.
> >>
> >> Birgitte SB
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Sun, 4/27/08, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Michael Bimmler <mbimmler[at]gmail.com>
> >> > Subject: [Foundation-l] Request to allow Google to search list
> >> archives again
> >> > To: "Wikimedia developers" <wikitech-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org>
> >> > Cc: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
> >> <foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org>
> >> > Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008, 12:30 PM
> >>
> >>
> >> > [courtesy copy to foundation-l, though I suggest that
> >> > discussion, if any, be
> >> > centralised on wikitech-l]
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> > the search index for the mailinglist archives was last
> >> > rebuilt in January.
> >> > Now, after having made quite a few queries about this here
> >> > and at other
> >> > places, I learnt (and obviously had to accept) that
> >> > rebuilding the search
> >> > index is quite a resources-consuming process which resulted
> >> > in crashes.
> >> >
> >> > To put it bluntly, I dare suggest from a non-technical POV
> >> > that the "htdig"
> >> > (that's the name, isn't it?) experiment has failed.
> >> > If we can only update
> >> > our search index every 6 months or so, it is pointless to
> >> > have it.
> >> >
> >> > Instead, I suggest that
> >> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/robots.txt be modified as
> >> > to allow Google (and other search engines) to crawl
> >> > /pipermail/ again. I do
> >> > not really see the privacy issues of this, nabble, gmane
> >> > etc. are
> >> > google-searchable as well and I really don't see the
> >> > point in barring Google
> >> > from our own archive.
> >> >
> >> > If I am very honest, I do not even remember anymore, why we
> >> > decided to bar
> >> > Google from http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail.
> >> > Was it due to privacy concerns? If so, which, and why is
> >> > lists.wikimedia.orgas an archive different from
> >> > Nabble/Gmane?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Michael
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Michael Bimmler
> >> > mbimmler[at]gmail.com
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > foundation-l mailing list
> >> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> > Unsubscribe:
> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> >> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> >> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> >> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


samueljhenderson at gmail

Apr 28, 2008, 2:26 AM

Post #3 of 3 (371 views)
Permalink
Re: Request to allow Google to search list archivesagain [In reply to]

Well, if anyone making a non-trivial investment of time and effort can
already search the archives, it seems to me that nothing would be lost by
making the archives *more* open and accessible. Great! Let's do it.

In other words, if that was meant to be the new, unconsidered argument that
Philippe mentioned, it went straight over my head.

Cheers,

Sam

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:54 PM, David Goodman <dgoodmanny[at]gmail.com>
wrote:

> Its an open list--if they join it, they can search it.
>
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Wikipedia foundation RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.