
dgoodmanny at gmail
Apr 27, 2008, 12:01 PM
Post #3 of 3
(237 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Request to allow Google to search list archives again
[In reply to]
|
|
absolutely no. G already indexes much too many of the incidental discussions at WP. On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb [at] yahoo> wrote: > I support this especially as url's to old messages are not stable. An effective search is greatly needed. I have spent a long time on occasion for searching for things I am certain exist and came up with nothing. > > Birgitte SB > > > --- On Sun, 4/27/08, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail> wrote: > > > From: Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail> > > Subject: [Foundation-l] Request to allow Google to search list archives again > > To: "Wikimedia developers" <wikitech-l [at] lists> > > Cc: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l [at] lists> > > Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008, 12:30 PM > > > > [courtesy copy to foundation-l, though I suggest that > > discussion, if any, be > > centralised on wikitech-l] > > > > Hi all, > > the search index for the mailinglist archives was last > > rebuilt in January. > > Now, after having made quite a few queries about this here > > and at other > > places, I learnt (and obviously had to accept) that > > rebuilding the search > > index is quite a resources-consuming process which resulted > > in crashes. > > > > To put it bluntly, I dare suggest from a non-technical POV > > that the "htdig" > > (that's the name, isn't it?) experiment has failed. > > If we can only update > > our search index every 6 months or so, it is pointless to > > have it. > > > > Instead, I suggest that > > http://lists.wikimedia.org/robots.txt be modified as > > to allow Google (and other search engines) to crawl > > /pipermail/ again. I do > > not really see the privacy issues of this, nabble, gmane > > etc. are > > google-searchable as well and I really don't see the > > point in barring Google > > from our own archive. > > > > If I am very honest, I do not even remember anymore, why we > > decided to bar > > Google from http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail. > > Was it due to privacy concerns? If so, which, and why is > > lists.wikimedia.orgas an archive different from > > Nabble/Gmane? > > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > > > > -- > > Michael Bimmler > > mbimmler [at] gmail > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > foundation-l [at] lists > > Unsubscribe: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l [at] lists > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > -- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l [at] lists Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
|