Mailing List Archive: Wikipedia: Foundation

Top posters

1 2 3

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

rarohde at gmail

Jan 8, 2008, 9:20 AM

Post #1 of 70 (1561 views)
Permalink

Top posters

On Jan 8, 2008 6:19 AM, Brian McNeil <brian.mcneil [at] wikinewsie> wrote:

> <snip>
>
Forgive me if some of this is retreading old ground, but I've over 50
> messages for this list since yesterday. Can we have a rerun (or a January
> run) of the top poster stats? I was 2nd last time and felt embarrassed
> despite having thought most of what I wrote was close to the topic in
> question.
>
>
Posts in December to Foundation-l

1 Thomas Dalton - 123
2 Anthony - 70
3 Andrew Whitworth - 64
4 David Gerard - 48
5 Florence Devouard - 47
6 Brian McNeil - 43
7 Nathan Awrich - 36
8 Ray Saintonge - 33
T9 GerardM - 32
T9 Mike Godwin - 32
T9 Erik Moeller - 32

-Robert Rohde
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

thomas.dalton at gmail

Jan 8, 2008, 9:29 AM

Post #2 of 70 (1490 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

> Posts in December to Foundation-l
>
> 1 Thomas Dalton - 123
> 2 Anthony - 70
> 3 Andrew Whitworth - 64
> 4 David Gerard - 48
> 5 Florence Devouard - 47
> 6 Brian McNeil - 43
> 7 Nathan Awrich - 36
> 8 Ray Saintonge - 33
> T9 GerardM - 32
> T9 Mike Godwin - 32
> T9 Erik Moeller - 32

Ouch! I think that is heavily skewed by one topic, though. Do you have
the total number of posts? Would be interesting to see it as a
percentage.

I think one reason I sent so many emails (other than just saying a
lot, of course), is that when I'm replying to 3 people I'll send 3
emails. I've seen that other people prefer to do compilation emails
replying to everyone at once. Should I switch to doing that?

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

rarohde at gmail

Jan 8, 2008, 9:37 AM

Post #3 of 70 (1475 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

On Jan 8, 2008 9:29 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail> wrote:

> > Posts in December to Foundation-l
> >
> > 1 Thomas Dalton - 123
> > 2 Anthony - 70
> > 3 Andrew Whitworth - 64
> > 4 David Gerard - 48
> > 5 Florence Devouard - 47
> > 6 Brian McNeil - 43
> > 7 Nathan Awrich - 36
> > 8 Ray Saintonge - 33
> > T9 GerardM - 32
> > T9 Mike Godwin - 32
> > T9 Erik Moeller - 32
>
> Ouch! I think that is heavily skewed by one topic, though. Do you have
> the total number of posts? Would be interesting to see it as a
> percentage.
>

1258 total posts by 158 contributors.

-Robert Rohde
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

matthew.britton at btinternet

Jan 8, 2008, 10:12 AM

Post #4 of 70 (1483 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

--- Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail> wrote:

> > Posts in December to Foundation-l
> >
> > 1 Thomas Dalton - 123
> > 2 Anthony - 70
> > 3 Andrew Whitworth - 64
> > 4 David Gerard - 48
> > 5 Florence Devouard - 47
> > 6 Brian McNeil - 43
> > 7 Nathan Awrich - 36
> > 8 Ray Saintonge - 33
> > T9 GerardM - 32
> > T9 Mike Godwin - 32
> > T9 Erik Moeller - 32
>
> Ouch! I think that is heavily skewed by one topic,
> though. Do you have
> the total number of posts? Would be interesting to see it
> as a
> percentage.
>
> I think one reason I sent so many emails (other than just
> saying a
> lot, of course), is that when I'm replying to 3 people
> I'll send 3
> emails. I've seen that other people prefer to do
> compilation emails
> replying to everyone at once. Should I switch to doing
> that?

You also have to factor in the need to reply to post count
posts explaining why it is that you have so many posts,
which of course, generates more posts. :)

-Gurch

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

meno25wiki at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 10:47 AM

Post #5 of 70 (1478 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

Just curious, can you generate the same statistics for all posts to this
list (since 2004)?

--User:Meno25

On Jan 8, 2008 7:37 PM, Robert Rohde <rarohde [at] gmail> wrote:

> On Jan 8, 2008 9:29 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> > > Posts in December to Foundation-l
> > >
> > > 1 Thomas Dalton - 123
> > > 2 Anthony - 70
> > > 3 Andrew Whitworth - 64
> > > 4 David Gerard - 48
> > > 5 Florence Devouard - 47
> > > 6 Brian McNeil - 43
> > > 7 Nathan Awrich - 36
> > > 8 Ray Saintonge - 33
> > > T9 GerardM - 32
> > > T9 Mike Godwin - 32
> > > T9 Erik Moeller - 32
> >
> > Ouch! I think that is heavily skewed by one topic, though. Do you have
> > the total number of posts? Would be interesting to see it as a
> > percentage.
> >
>
>
> 1258 total posts by 158 contributors.
>
> -Robert Rohde
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

kalan.001 at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 11:23 AM

Post #6 of 70 (1481 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

2008/1/10, Meno 25 <meno25wiki [at] gmail>:
> Just curious, can you generate the same statistics for all posts to this
> list (since 2004)?

01 Ray Saintonge 1096
02 Anthere 1070
03 Erik Moeller 878
04 David Gerard 798
05 Anthony 620
06 geni 561
07 Thomas Dalton 540
08 Daniel Mayer 526
09 GerardM 485
10 Gregory Maxwell 435
11 Gerard Meijssen 407
12 Florence Devouard 348
13 Angela 345
14 Delirium 325
15 Jimmy Wales 322
16 Robert Scott Horning 309
17 Andre Engels 254
18 James Hare 253
19 Delphine Ménard 252
19 Brion Vibber 252
21 Jeff V. Merkey 249
22 Andrew Gray 244
23 Birgitte SB 233
24 Aphaia 229
25 Jeffrey V. Merkey 222
26 Walter van Kalken 217
27 Anthony DiPierro 212
28 Casey Brown 205
29 Brian McNeil 196
30 daniwo59 at aol.com 194
31 effe iets anders 178
32 Brianna Laugher 178
33 Yann Forget 157
34 Michael Bimmler 154
35 George Herbert 150
35 Michael Snow 150
37 SJ 148
38 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 145
39 Dan Rosenthal 137
40 Oldak Quill 131
41 Samuel Klein 130
41 Tim Starling 130
41 Mark Williamson 120
44 Sj 114
44 Andrew Whitworth 114
46 Walter Vermeir 111
46 Cormac Lawler 111
46 Milos Rancic 111
49 Lars Aronsson 109
50 Jean-Baptiste Soufron 104
51 Brad Patrick 103
52 Kelly Martin 100

The code was pretty easy, and if people like this feature, I can make
a Toolserver utility for Wikimedia lists basing of that. :)

— Kalan
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

thomas.dalton at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 11:33 AM

Post #7 of 70 (1473 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

> The code was pretty easy, and if people like this feature, I can make
> a Toolserver utility for Wikimedia lists basing of that. :)

Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple
email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to
say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?
For example, the top poster looks like it's actually Anthere, but she
posts under both her pseudonym and real name, so Ray ends up being on
top.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

kalan.001 at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 11:40 AM

Post #8 of 70 (1473 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

2008/1/10, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail>:
> Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple
> email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to
> say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?

Sure, that is quite possible. To prevent abuse, such form may require
login and accounts may be restricted, for example, to me and list
moderators (or maybe also stewards or even any user in good standing).

By the way, grouping is performed not by email address, but by "real
name" setting.

— Kalan
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

mbimmler at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 11:47 AM

Post #9 of 70 (1473 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

On Jan 9, 2008 8:40 PM, Kalan <kalan.001 [at] gmail> wrote:
> 2008/1/10, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail>:
> > Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple
> > email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to
> > say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?
>
> Sure, that is quite possible. To prevent abuse, such form may require
> login and accounts may be restricted, for example, to me and list
> moderators (or maybe also stewards or even any user in good standing).
>
> By the way, grouping is performed not by email address, but by "real
> name" setting.
>

I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be
easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval? Something
like "Thomas Dalton (thomas.dalton at gmail.com) claims that your
email address should be grouped together with thomas.dalton at
gmail.com Please click here to confirm"

Or is this technically more difficult?

Michael

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

kalan.001 at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 11:53 AM

Post #10 of 70 (1474 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

2008/1/10, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail>:
> I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be
> easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval?

Hmm, maybe. Then, after the tool will be ready, we should post
something that recommends that.

> Or is this technically more difficult?

It is a little, maybe just because I have no experience with automatic
mailing. But it needs to be set up just once, so I don't consider this
a bad idea.

— Kalan
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

nawrich at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 11:53 AM

Post #11 of 70 (1477 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

Or pointless all around? If we were using it for some reason beyond
snickering and ogling and a little bit of "Oh shit I post too much"
then making it more technically correct would be key, but...

On Jan 9, 2008 2:47 PM, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 8:40 PM, Kalan <kalan.001 [at] gmail> wrote:
> > 2008/1/10, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail>:
> > > Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple
> > > email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to
> > > say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?
> >
> > Sure, that is quite possible. To prevent abuse, such form may require
> > login and accounts may be restricted, for example, to me and list
> > moderators (or maybe also stewards or even any user in good standing).
> >
> > By the way, grouping is performed not by email address, but by "real
> > name" setting.
> >
>
> I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be
> easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval? Something
> like "Thomas Dalton (thomas.dalton at gmail.com) claims that your
> email address should be grouped together with thomas.dalton at
> gmail.com Please click here to confirm"
>
> Or is this technically more difficult?
>
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

gerard.meijssen at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 11:57 AM

Post #12 of 70 (1474 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

Hoi,
I am twice on the list. The only thing that I have to say in my "defence" is
that I have been posting for a long time now. Appreciating from a numerical
point of view who the top poster is, means that you have to calculate the
amount of time that is involved. I am sure that both Ray and myself will not
be as bad seen in such a light :)
NB I enjoy reading Ray :)
Thanks,
GerardM

On Jan 9, 2008 8:47 PM, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail> wrote:

> On Jan 9, 2008 8:40 PM, Kalan <kalan.001 [at] gmail> wrote:
> > 2008/1/10, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail>:
> > > Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple
> > > email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to
> > > say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?
> >
> > Sure, that is quite possible. To prevent abuse, such form may require
> > login and accounts may be restricted, for example, to me and list
> > moderators (or maybe also stewards or even any user in good standing).
> >
> > By the way, grouping is performed not by email address, but by "real
> > name" setting.
> >
>
> I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be
> easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval? Something
> like "Thomas Dalton (thomas.dalton at gmail.com) claims that your
> email address should be grouped together with thomas.dalton at
> gmail.com Please click here to confirm"
>
> Or is this technically more difficult?
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

innocentkiller at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 12:10 PM

Post #13 of 70 (1468 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

Same reason I choose not to be on the "List of Wikipedians by edit."

Chad H.

On Jan 9, 2008 2:53 PM, Nathan <nawrich [at] gmail> wrote:
> Or pointless all around? If we were using it for some reason beyond
> snickering and ogling and a little bit of "Oh shit I post too much"
> then making it more technically correct would be key, but...
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 2:47 PM, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail> wrote:
> > On Jan 9, 2008 8:40 PM, Kalan <kalan.001 [at] gmail> wrote:
> > > 2008/1/10, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail>:
> > > > Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple
> > > > email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to
> > > > say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?
> > >
> > > Sure, that is quite possible. To prevent abuse, such form may require
> > > login and accounts may be restricted, for example, to me and list
> > > moderators (or maybe also stewards or even any user in good standing).
> > >
> > > By the way, grouping is performed not by email address, but by "real
> > > name" setting.
> > >
> >
> > I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be
> > easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval? Something
> > like "Thomas Dalton (thomas.dalton at gmail.com) claims that your
> > email address should be grouped together with thomas.dalton at
> > gmail.com Please click here to confirm"
> >
> > Or is this technically more difficult?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l [at] lists
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

dgerard at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 12:24 PM

Post #14 of 70 (1470 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

On 09/01/2008, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail> wrote:

> I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be
> easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval? Something
> like "Thomas Dalton (thomas.dalton at gmail.com) claims that your
> email address should be grouped together with thomas.dalton at
> gmail.com Please click here to confirm"
> Or is this technically more difficult?

This is just numbers for our amusement to show who has a lot to say
(for whatever reason), not something that warrants any interference
with how things work whatsoever. A simple post-counter, which lets you
tell it when two From: lines are one person, is all such a creature
would warrant.

- d.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Anthere9 at yahoo

Jan 9, 2008, 12:26 PM

Post #15 of 70 (1474 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

oh my...

I am first...

(red) ant

Kalan wrote:
> 2008/1/10, Meno 25 <meno25wiki [at] gmail>:
>> Just curious, can you generate the same statistics for all posts to this
>> list (since 2004)?
>
> 01 Ray Saintonge 1096
> 02 Anthere 1070
> 03 Erik Moeller 878
> 04 David Gerard 798
> 05 Anthony 620
> 06 geni 561
> 07 Thomas Dalton 540
> 08 Daniel Mayer 526
> 09 GerardM 485
> 10 Gregory Maxwell 435
> 11 Gerard Meijssen 407
> 12 Florence Devouard 348
> 13 Angela 345
> 14 Delirium 325
> 15 Jimmy Wales 322
> 16 Robert Scott Horning 309
> 17 Andre Engels 254
> 18 James Hare 253
> 19 Delphine Ménard 252
> 19 Brion Vibber 252
> 21 Jeff V. Merkey 249
> 22 Andrew Gray 244
> 23 Birgitte SB 233
> 24 Aphaia 229
> 25 Jeffrey V. Merkey 222
> 26 Walter van Kalken 217
> 27 Anthony DiPierro 212
> 28 Casey Brown 205
> 29 Brian McNeil 196
> 30 daniwo59 at aol.com 194
> 31 effe iets anders 178
> 32 Brianna Laugher 178
> 33 Yann Forget 157
> 34 Michael Bimmler 154
> 35 George Herbert 150
> 35 Michael Snow 150
> 37 SJ 148
> 38 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 145
> 39 Dan Rosenthal 137
> 40 Oldak Quill 131
> 41 Samuel Klein 130
> 41 Tim Starling 130
> 41 Mark Williamson 120
> 44 Sj 114
> 44 Andrew Whitworth 114
> 46 Walter Vermeir 111
> 46 Cormac Lawler 111
> 46 Milos Rancic 111
> 49 Lars Aronsson 109
> 50 Jean-Baptiste Soufron 104
> 51 Brad Patrick 103
> 52 Kelly Martin 100
>
> The code was pretty easy, and if people like this feature, I can make
> a Toolserver utility for Wikimedia lists basing of that. :)
>
> — Kalan
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

tacodeposit at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 12:31 PM

Post #16 of 70 (1472 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

On Jan 9, 2008 1:33 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> Is there any way you could merge the counts for people with multiple
> email addresses? Some way for people to enter addresses into a form to
> say they are the same person (and some way for others to review it)?
> For example, the top poster looks like it's actually Anthere, but she
> posts under both her pseudonym and real name, so Ray ends up being on
> top.
>

Using office spreadsheet program I merged: Anthere / Florence
Devouard, Anthony / Anthony DiPierro; GerardM / Gerard Meijssen; Jeff
V. Merkey / Jeffrey V. Merkey; SJ / Samuel Klein / Sj -- Hope I
didn't miss anyone

1 Anthere 1418
2 Ray Saintonge 1096
3 GerardM 892
4 Erik Moeller 878
5 Anthony 832
6 David Gerard 798
7 geni 561
8 Thomas Dalton 540
9 Daniel Mayer 526
10 Jeff V. Merkey 471
11 Gregory Maxwell 435
12 SJ 392
13 Angela 345
14 Delirium 325
15 Jimmy Wales 322
16 Robert Scott Horning 309
17 Andre Engels 254
18 James Hare 253
19 Delphine M�nard 252
20 Brion Vibber 252
21 Andrew Gray 244
22 Birgitte SB 233
23 Aphaia 229
24 Walter van Kalken 217
25 Casey Brown 205
26 Brian McNeil 196
27 daniwo59 at aol.com 194
28 effe iets anders 178
29 Brianna Laugher 178
30 Yann Forget 157
31 Michael Bimmler 154
32 George Herbert 150
33 Michael Snow 150
34 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 145
35 Dan Rosenthal 137
36 Oldak Quill 131
37 Tim Starling 130
38 Mark Williamson 120
39 Andrew Whitworth 114
40 Walter Vermeir 111
41 Cormac Lawler 111
42 Milos Rancic 111
43 Lars Aronsson 109
44 Jean-Baptiste Soufron 104
45 Brad Patrick 103
46 Kelly Martin 100

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

mbimmler at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 12:39 PM

Post #17 of 70 (1483 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

On Jan 9, 2008 9:24 PM, David Gerard <dgerard [at] gmail> wrote:
> On 09/01/2008, Michael Bimmler <mbimmler [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> > I might be missing something but wouldn't confirmation emails be
> > easier for this than a set of admins and manual approval? Something
> > like "Thomas Dalton (thomas.dalton at gmail.com) claims that your
> > email address should be grouped together with thomas.dalton at
> > gmail.com Please click here to confirm"
> > Or is this technically more difficult?
>
>
> This is just numbers for our amusement to show who has a lot to say
> (for whatever reason), not something that warrants any interference
> with how things work whatsoever. A simple post-counter, which lets you
> tell it when two From: lines are one person, is all such a creature
> would warrant.
>

Ahem... I will now point to the fact that I used conjunctive and was
thus only making theoretical suggestions etc.etc. No, seriously, I
completely agree, it is too much of an effort for the top poster list.
<listmoderator-hat-on> This still means that the
15posts-a-day-average-people might want to blush now </>

Michael

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

cbrown1023.ml at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 12:55 PM

Post #18 of 70 (1475 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

Why don't we all just use the fabulous existing statistics (that you
probably didn't know existed :-P) at <http://infodisiac.com/>?

These are by Erik Zachte, are updated every evening, and have a very
wide variety of tables, for example:
* Most posts on all WM mailing lists:
<http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/_PowerPosters.html>
* This list: <http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/foundation-l.html>

--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

nawrich at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 1:13 PM

Post #19 of 70 (1471 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

Interesting that it confirms that Board participation in this list is
down considerably in both relative and absolute terms. What was it
that caused the huge spike in everything in Dec '06?

Looks like there are at least a few lists that could be deleted for
lack of participation, but I had no idea there was so damn many!

Nathan

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

thomas.dalton at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 2:30 PM

Post #20 of 70 (1479 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

On 09/01/2008, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 [at] yahoo> wrote:
> oh my...
>
> I am first...
>
> (red) ant

The chair of the foundation sending the most emails to the foundation
mailing list - that's a very good sign.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

cbrown1023.ml at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 2:32 PM

Post #21 of 70 (1481 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

well, she's also been with the foundation for years, so it's not all
that surprising. :-)

On Jan 9, 2008 5:30 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton [at] gmail> wrote:
> On 09/01/2008, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 [at] yahoo> wrote:
> > oh my...
> >
> > I am first...
> >
> > (red) ant
>
> The chair of the foundation sending the most emails to the foundation
> mailing list - that's a very good sign.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

saintonge at telus

Jan 9, 2008, 3:50 PM

Post #22 of 70 (1473 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> The only thing that I have to say in my "defence" is
> that I have been posting for a long time now. Appreciating from a numerical
> point of view who the top poster is, means that you have to calculate the
> amount of time that is involved.
In studying the figures I noted that seven of them posted in April 2004
when the list started. All seven have posted at least once since the
beginning of December 2007. Such dedication needs to be congratulated.

19 on the list had their first post before the end of 2004.
> I am sure that both Ray and myself will not
> be as bad seen in such a light :)
> NB I enjoy reading Ray :)
Thanks, I often wonder whether anyone reads what I say.

Ec

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

andreengels at gmail

Jan 9, 2008, 4:57 PM

Post #23 of 70 (1470 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

2008/1/9, Nathan <nawrich [at] gmail>:
> Interesting that it confirms that Board participation in this list is
> down considerably in both relative and absolute terms. What was it
> that caused the huge spike in everything in Dec '06?

Looking at the archives, I see 2 or 3 very large subjects that month:
* English Wikipedia policy to forbid non-latin-1 usernames, and the
consequences it could have under SUL
* The then-current fundraiser and the mention of the Virgin matching
donation being perceived as an ad

--
Andre Engels, andreengels [at] gmail
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

nawrich at gmail

Feb 6, 2008, 1:35 PM

Post #24 of 70 (1431 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

January update anyone?

On Jan 9, 2008 7:57 PM, Andre Engels <andreengels [at] gmail> wrote:
> 2008/1/9, Nathan <nawrich [at] gmail>:
> > Interesting that it confirms that Board participation in this list is
> > down considerably in both relative and absolute terms. What was it
> > that caused the huge spike in everything in Dec '06?
>
> Looking at the archives, I see 2 or 3 very large subjects that month:
> * English Wikipedia policy to forbid non-latin-1 usernames, and the
> consequences it could have under SUL
> * The then-current fundraiser and the mention of the Virgin matching
> donation being perceived as an ad
>
> --
> Andre Engels, andreengels [at] gmail
> ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

cbrown1023.ml at gmail

Feb 6, 2008, 1:43 PM

Post #25 of 70 (1431 views)
Permalink

Re: Top posters [In reply to]

<http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/foundation-l.html> ?

On Feb 6, 2008 4:35 PM, Nathan <nawrich [at] gmail> wrote:
> January update anyone?
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 7:57 PM, Andre Engels <andreengels [at] gmail> wrote:
> > 2008/1/9, Nathan <nawrich [at] gmail>:
> > > Interesting that it confirms that Board participation in this list is
> > > down considerably in both relative and absolute terms. What was it
> > > that caused the huge spike in everything in Dec '06?
> >
> > Looking at the archives, I see 2 or 3 very large subjects that month:
> > * English Wikipedia policy to forbid non-latin-1 usernames, and the
> > consequences it could have under SUL
> > * The then-current fundraiser and the mention of the Virgin matching
> > donation being perceived as an ad
> >
> > --
> > Andre Engels, andreengels [at] gmail
> > ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l [at] lists
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

1 2 3

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads