<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Wikipedia | Foundation</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 20:13:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: List moderation</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Brion Vibber &amp;lt;brion@pobox.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m taking the liberty of putting foundation-l on temporary moderation. &amp;gt; Seri</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 11:30:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182862</link>
</item><item>
<title>List moderation</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m taking the liberty of putting foundation-l on temporary moderation. Seriously, guys -- take the &amp;quot;who&amp;#039;s a bigger jerk&amp;quot; threads offlist. The regul</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 04:46:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182828</link>
</item><item>
<title>foundation-l foundation</title>
<description>Dear Foundation-l, There seems that there is a lot of discussion about foundation-l on foundation-l that should be made available to a more meta commu</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 04:42:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182827</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Growth vs. maintenance</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 3:05 AM, David Goodman &amp;lt;dgoodmanny@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; We need, as does every voluntary society, the involvement of many &amp;gt; ord</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 04:41:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182826</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>2009/11/8 &amp;lt;WJhonson@aol.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; The reason I asked for no personal attacks is because the above, by you, &amp;gt; sounds very much like : &amp;quot;You are the prob</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 03:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182817</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>This thread should be an illustrative example in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect .  - d. ________________________________</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 03:06:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182816</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>In a message dated 11/8/2009 2:06:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, gerard.meijssen@gmail.com writes:  &amp;gt; Your notion that you &amp;quot;deserve&amp;quot; at least as much</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 02:50:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182815</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>Hoi, This was not meant as an attack. What I intended to do is rebut your arguments. When this is considered as a personal attack, it means that it is</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 02:40:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182814</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>In a message dated 11/8/2009 2:06:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, gerard.meijssen@gmail.com writes:  &amp;gt; When you learn from your research that we have a</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 02:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182799</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>Hoi, Please do your research.. but do not expect that people did not look at the numbers before. So the person that most needs to be convinced is you</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 02:06:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182798</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:13 AM, &amp;lt;WJhonson@aol.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Is there a way to create a chart showing how many messages each poster has &amp;gt; posted to t</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 01:09:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182797</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>I will in the next few days, create a list which shows who, each month, has posted the most messages to the list. Or perhaps the top few. I was su</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:57:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182795</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>Gerard may post quite a bit, but in general his posts serve a purpose. Many people on this list seem to write just to see their words, that is to say,</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182794</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>In a message dated 11/8/2009 12:30:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, gerard.meijssen@gmail.com writes:  &amp;gt; Now if you think that you need to &amp;gt; pass judgem</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:38:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182793</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>Hoi, If you want statistics, you do not have to google ... there are our own statistics ... http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/_PowerPosters</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:29:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182792</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>There is already a statistics page, http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/Index.html skype: node.ue  On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:13 AM, &amp;lt;WJhonson</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:28:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182791</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>In a message dated 11/8/2009 12:12:51 AM Pacific Standard Time, phoebe.wiki@gmail.com writes:  &amp;gt; Many of these emails have a bit &amp;gt; of a hostile tone</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:15:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182790</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>In a message dated 11/7/2009 11:28:13 PM Pacific Standard Time, gerard.meijssen@gmail.com writes:  &amp;gt; Please read it as an appeal to reply to foundat</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:13:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182789</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:27 PM, &amp;lt;WJhonson@aol.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; In a message dated 11/7/2009 9:13:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, &amp;gt; thomas.dalton@gmail.com</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 00:12:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182788</link>
</item><item>
<title>the use of foundation-l</title>
<description>Hoi, I am at the Commons usability conference in Paris. I am not on any internal mailing lists. It has become painfully obvious that as a consequence</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 23:27:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182787</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>In a message dated 11/7/2009 9:13:01 PM Pacific Standard Time, thomas.dalton@gmail.com writes:  &amp;gt; And how do you answer them? Based on your experien</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 22:27:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182786</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>In a message dated 11/7/2009 8:54:55 PM Pacific Standard Time, william@scissor.com writes:  &amp;gt; But as far as I know, they aren&amp;#039;t actually imposing an</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 22:19:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182785</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>2009/11/8 William Pietri &amp;lt;william@scissor.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Thomas Dalton wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; So people would rather I decided what they are and aren&amp;#039;t interested &amp;gt;&amp;gt; in?</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 21:12:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182784</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>2009/11/8 William Pietri &amp;lt;william@scissor.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Thomas Dalton wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ignoring emails *is* easy. Anyone that says otherwise is wrong. I do &amp;gt;&amp;gt; not</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 21:08:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182783</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The state of Foundation-l (again) was: Recent firing?</title>
<description>Thomas Dalton wrote: &amp;gt; So people would rather I decided what they are and aren&amp;#039;t interested &amp;gt; in? Surprising... most people I know like to make their</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 21:03:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/foundation/182782</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
