borneo.antonio at gmail
Oct 21, 2009, 7:21 PM
Post #3 of 4
have to say that your implementation is much cleaner than mine.
Does it make sense adding this tool to vpnc?
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Michael Stapelberg
<michael+vpnc [at] stapelberg> wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
> Excerpts from Antonio Borneo's message of Mi Okt 21 19:33:12 +0200 2009:
>> the patch in attachment adds a new binary to vpnc, that provides the
>> functionality you need.
>> It obfuscates a text accordingly to Cisco encryption.
>> I have created it reverting the order of deobfuscate().
> I have already created such a patch in May 2009, but I directly sent it
> to Maurice, who does not seem to have any interest in merging it. Just
> for your information, and for maybe taking the best out of both, I
> attached it to this mail.
> Best regards,
vpnc-devel mailing list
vpnc-devel [at] unix-ag