
borneo.antonio at gmail
Oct 21, 2009, 7:21 PM
Post #3 of 4
(213 views)
Permalink
|
Hi Michael, have to say that your implementation is much cleaner than mine. Does it make sense adding this tool to vpnc? Best Regards, Antonio Borneo On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Michael Stapelberg <michael+vpnc[at]stapelberg.de> wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > Excerpts from Antonio Borneo's message of Mi Okt 21 19:33:12 +0200 2009: >> the patch in attachment adds a new binary to vpnc, that provides the >> functionality you need. >> It obfuscates a text accordingly to Cisco encryption. >> I have created it reverting the order of deobfuscate(). > I have already created such a patch in May 2009, but I directly sent it > to Maurice, who does not seem to have any interest in merging it. Just > for your information, and for maybe taking the best out of both, I > attached it to this mail. > > Best regards, > Michael _______________________________________________ vpnc-devel mailing list vpnc-devel[at]unix-ag.uni-kl.de https://lists.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/mailman/listinfo/vpnc-devel http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/
|