
jvolkman at gmail
Jul 21, 2009, 7:58 AM
Post #2 of 4
(1432 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] vpnc error handling and cleanup
[In reply to]
|
|
Hi Ricky, Looks like we had the same idea. I actually posted a similar patch using atexit() back in January. You can see it here: http://lists.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/pipermail/vpnc-devel/2009-January/002960.html This patch has been working great for me and my coworkers for the past 7 months or so. Before that vpnc crashes were extremely annoying. Thanks, Jeremy On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Ricky Zhou <ricky [at] rzhou> wrote: > On 2009-06-09 02:57:40 AM, Ricky Zhou wrote: > > I have a first (hideous and scary) attempt at a patch against SVN trunk > > at http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/vpnc/vpnc.patch. I don't really > > expect this atexit hack to be accepted as it is now - it probably causes > > failures in a bunch of situations that I didn't test. I do hope that > > this will bring some attention to this issue though, and maybe some more > > experienced/knowledgeable people might have some suggestions on how to > > do this properly. > Hey, my original email got marked as spam for some reason, but did > anybody get a chance to take a look at this? > > (full original email at > http://lists.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/pipermail/vpnc-devel/2009-June/003081.html > if it got caught in any spam filters) > > Thanks, > Ricky > > _______________________________________________ > vpnc-devel mailing list > vpnc-devel [at] unix-ag > https://lists.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/mailman/listinfo/vpnc-devel > http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/<http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/%7Emassar/vpnc/> > >
|