tfheen at varnish-software
May 27, 2011, 12:24 AM
Post #5 of 6
]] Andrea Campi
| Also, eventually it would be nice not to require a checked out tree.
This is currently because we don't promise anything wrt API and ABI
stability. Eventually, I'm hoping we can have a stable API and ABI, but
given how new the vmod mechanism is, we don't know if we've gotten it
right or not yet.
| The tricky part is doing it in such a way that e.g. vmod.py emits correct
| includes when building in-tree (e.g. #include "bin/varnishd/cache.h") and
| out (e.g. #include <varnish/cache.h> or include <varnish/private/cache.h>
| or something like that).
That's one of the easier problems to solve, really.
| I guess it all depends on how private you want to keep some of the header
Tollef Fog Heen
t: +47 21 98 92 64
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev [at] varnish-cache