Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Trac: Users

[Trac]: Performance of Tracd

 

 

Trac users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


raja.mohammed at gmail

Oct 20, 2009, 8:36 AM

Post #1 of 2 (256 views)
Permalink
[Trac]: Performance of Tracd

hi,

I have installed the Trac 0.11.5 and use tracd to start trac.
However, I find that the performance is not upto the exectation.

This Trac will be used by people from multiple Geographical locations right
from US to Japan.
When more than, say, around 10 or 12 people try to access the webpage(s), it
misbehaves ...
throws starnge error message ...

The questions I ask is:
1. Is it Ok to use tracd standalone for such requirements? If not, suggest
me alternatives ...
2. How stable is the SQLite DB provided by Trac?

Cheers.
Raja Mohammed Hussain P
===============================================
For a world without Walls and Fences, why do we need Windows and Gates !!!
===============================================

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users [at] googlegroups
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscribe [at] googlegroups
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


jake.the.stone at gmail

Oct 20, 2009, 3:01 PM

Post #2 of 2 (234 views)
Permalink
Re: [Trac]: Performance of Tracd [In reply to]

Take my recommendations with a grain of salt; I'm rather new to Trac
(though not Apache).

You probably will not want to use the trac standalone process. This is
fine for smaller teams with simple needs, and can even be installed as a
system service to start automatically, you will never get the
configuration and performance options that you will get with an
enterprise webserver like Apache. Since there's instructions on the Trac
site how to configure Apache with mod_python, I'd recommend that.

Then your problem is not optimizing Trac, but optimizing Apache, which
is outside the scope of this list. However, there are lots of things you
can use in Apache to increase performance, like keep-alive connections,
content caching, compression, etc. For a world-wide deployment, you may
consider localized caching proxies (also supported by Apache) so that
the web servers can quickly serve static or cached content.


Raja Mohammed Hussain wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have installed the Trac 0.11.5 and use tracd to start trac.
> However, I find that the performance is not upto the exectation.
>
> This Trac will be used by people from multiple Geographical locations
> right from US to Japan.
> When more than, say, around 10 or 12 people try to access the
> webpage(s), it misbehaves ...
> throws starnge error message ...
>
> The questions I ask is:
> 1. Is it Ok to use tracd standalone for such requirements? If not,
> suggest me alternatives ...
> 2. How stable is the SQLite DB provided by Trac?
>
> Cheers.
> Raja Mohammed Hussain P
> ===============================================
> For a world without Walls and Fences, why do we need Windows and Gates !!!
> ===============================================
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users [at] googlegroups
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscribe [at] googlegroups
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Trac users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.