Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: SPF: SRS

spfd vs postfix

 

 

SPF srs RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


eddy.beliveau at hec

Mar 15, 2006, 12:25 PM

Post #1 of 3 (2581 views)
Permalink
spfd vs postfix

Hi|

I'm using postfix 2.2.3
with perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1-1
and spfd (# $Id: spfd 141 2006-02-07 00:04:51Z julian $)

Then I did the following

$ echo /usr/bin/spfd --set-user nobody --set-group nobody | at now
$ ps -ef | grep spfd
nobody 20791 20790 0 14:43 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/spfd listening on TCP port 5970

$ vi /etc/postfix/main.cf , I added the 'check_policy_service' at end of
'smtpd_recipient_restrictions' section
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...cut...
check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:5970

$ postfix stop ; postfix start

$ tail /var/log/messages
Mar 15 14:52:49 smtpext1 postfix/smtpd[12501]: warning: missing attribute action in input from
127.0.0.1:5970
Mar 15 14:52:49 smtpext1 postfix/smtpd[12501]: warning: problem talking to server 127.0.0.1:5970:
Success

Did I miss something ?

Thanks,
Eddy


-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=srs-discuss[at]v2.listbox.com


julian at mehnle

Mar 15, 2006, 4:11 PM

Post #2 of 3 (2409 views)
Permalink
Re: spfd vs postfix [In reply to]

Eddy Beliveau wrote:
> I'm using postfix 2.2.3
> with perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1-1
> and spfd (# $Id: spfd 141 2006-02-07 00:04:51Z julian $)
>
> Then I did the following
>
> $ echo /usr/bin/spfd --set-user nobody --set-group nobody | at now
> $ ps -ef | grep spfd
> nobody 20791 20790 0 14:43 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/spfd
> listening on TCP port 5970
>
> [...]
>
> $ tail /var/log/messages
> Mar 15 14:52:49 smtpext1 postfix/smtpd[12501]: warning: missing
> attribute action in input from 127.0.0.1:5970
> Mar 15 14:52:49 smtpext1 postfix/smtpd[12501]: warning: problem talking
> to server 127.0.0.1:5970: Success
>
> Did I miss something ?

First, this question is more appropriate for spf-help, not for srs-discuss
(or spf-discuss, for that matter).

Yes, you missed something. You should not be using spfd as the Postfix
policy daemon, but examples/postfix-policyd-spf instead. spfd is not what
you think it is.

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=srs-discuss[at]v2.listbox.com


eddy.beliveau at hec

Mar 16, 2006, 5:02 AM

Post #3 of 3 (2417 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: spfd vs postfix [In reply to]

Many thanks for your reply
Eddy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Mehnle" <julian[at]mehnle.net>
To: <spf-help[at]v2.listbox.com>
Cc: <srs-discuss[at]v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 7:11 PM
Subject: [srs-discuss] Re: spfd vs postfix


-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=srs-discuss[at]v2.listbox.com

SPF srs RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.