<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | SRS</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>16 May  2008 20:26:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Help with srs-socketmapd 0.32rc3</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to integrate SRS with my Sendmail mail server as I forward a small quantity of email to a webmail account. I&amp;#039;ve gone with srs-socketmapd a</description>
<pubDate>05 May  2008 11:35:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33713</link>
</item><item>
<title>sendmail srs/SRS-socketmap</title>
<description>Hi I have been looking for a SRS implimentaton to use with sendmail. I Like the concept of sendmail.srs especially in in its SRS-socketmap form. It</description>
<pubDate>25 Apr  2008 16:57:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Would SRS solve this problem?</title>
<description>I need help solving a situation where a sender&amp;#039;s message is being rejected after going through a legitimate e-mail spam/virus filtering service.  He</description>
<pubDate>23 Apr  2008 11:29:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33664</link>
</item><item>
<title>Not do SRS on mail that has been sent using SMTP-AUTH?</title>
<description>Hi! I&amp;#039;m using SRS on a couple of my mailservers. But I&amp;#039;ve seem to run into some problems, usually meaning that some of my users canīt seem to mail</description>
<pubDate>26 Feb  2008 00:47:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33325</link>
</item><item>
<title>Double quoted local parts failing syntax tests?</title>
<description>I am working with the pysrs library and have been doing some testing and when i give it a _legal_ (albeit rarely if ever used) email address of &amp;quot;Bla</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2008 18:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33302</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS broken after system upgrade</title>
<description>We upgraded our installation of Redhat Linux from EL3 to EL4, and everything worked after the reboot except SRS. Looks like there may be a problem be</description>
<pubDate>02 Jan  2008 14:45:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32952</link>
</item><item>
<title>Uploaded my SRS implementation for courier to the web</title>
<description>As I wrote two days ago, I have written a small utility to do SRS forwarding with the Courier mailserver. The first small documentation for it has b</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2007 09:30:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/31282</link>
</item><item>
<title>Wrapper around libsrs2 for Courier</title>
<description>Hi! I have written a small program using libsrs2 to be used with courier to do SRS address rewriting when forwarding messages today. I will publish</description>
<pubDate>15 Mar  2007 17:21:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/31249</link>
</item><item>
<title>Is libsrs2 completely dead?</title>
<description>Hi! Is libsrs2 dead? The website on libsrs2.org is off and I could also not contact any of the mail addresses when I tried to send the attached e-ma</description>
<pubDate>15 Mar  2007 13:27:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/31242</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS and Callbacks</title>
<description>OK I have to ask for help now. I have a user that is unable to send email because of what I consider broken call back. When this particular place do</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2007 21:17:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/30257</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS in .forward not working for me. help please.</title>
<description>Hi All,   I am trying to implement SRS in my .forward. I have the following in the .forward. In this case &amp;quot;othersrs&amp;quot; is the srs in /usr/local/bin/,</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2006 01:25:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29534</link>
</item><item>
<title>[no subject]</title>
<description>------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1129</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2006 19:33:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29366</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF tracking exist mechanisms</title>
<description>In &amp;lt;C195B116.153EF%hunter@userfriendly.net&amp;gt; Michael Weiner &amp;lt;hunter@userfriendly.net&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt; On 12/1/06 10:08 AM, &amp;quot;wayne&amp;quot; &amp;lt;wayne@schlitt.net&amp;gt; wrote</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2006 15:51:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29362</link>
</item><item>
<title>private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?</title>
<description>hi folks, i would like to provide a private SMTP relay so anyone (with any email address) on a particular network could use this SMTP server for out</description>
<pubDate>30 Nov  2006 05:22:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29312</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS for postfix ?</title>
<description>Hi there, This is strange, we can find SRS for Exim, Sendmail, (qmail ?) and  lots of MTA... but nothing for Postfix. Is there any way to have it w</description>
<pubDate>17 Aug  2006 01:46:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28051</link>
</item><item>
<title>seeing SRS0 in email from field</title>
<description>I am an end-user, rather than an email or system admin, but I have a decent understanding of smtp, a little understanding of spf, and a SLIGHT under</description>
<pubDate>16 Aug  2006 14:29:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28049</link>
</item><item>
<title>Allowed characters in SRS Hash</title>
<description>Hello,  I wondered if it is possible to exclude certain characters from being used where doing an SRS Hash with the Mail::SRS perl module? On my fir</description>
<pubDate>13 Aug  2006 10:08:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28006</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS/SPF Help Needed</title>
<description>Hi,   I need some advice off people who know about SRS! I&amp;#039;m designing a complete mail solution system based largely on open-source products with cu</description>
<pubDate>10 Jul  2006 03:56:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/27671</link>
</item><item>
<title>Testing SRS</title>
<description>Hi, all, I&amp;#039;m trying to get srs-socketmapd (v0.32rc3) working under sendmail on FreeBSD. I&amp;#039;ve followed all the installation instructions. I can see</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2006 11:24:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/27275</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mailing list abuse</title>
<description>I came up with a neat technique for tracing this kind of abuse. I run into it not only with mailing lists, but with braindead MTAs that reply to DSNs</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2006 10:48:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/27061</link>
</item><item>
<title>EHLO vs PTR for validation</title>
<description>On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Johann Steigenberger wrote: &amp;gt; We make a decision on smtp dialog after rcpt to: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; RCPT TO: Recipient@example.com &amp;gt; 550 Your mai</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2006 09:02:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/26775</link>
</item><item>
<title>Downloading a thread</title>
<description>Hi -- Admittedly, I am a very casual participant on this list. (Pretty much a lurker.) I&amp;#039;ve been following the &amp;#039;Why SRS Really Sucks&amp;#039; thread. Rega</description>
<pubDate>30 Mar  2006 08:10:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/26722</link>
</item><item>
<title>One of those well known providers</title>
<description>&amp;gt; (Spamming via SRS has not actually happened to me. I am just taking the &amp;gt; original posters complaint seriously. It is entirely possible &amp;gt; that the</description>
<pubDate>27 Mar  2006 11:56:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/26636</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?</title>
<description>I guess the &amp;quot;Why SRS really sucks&amp;quot; thread reminded me that its time for me to poke my head up once again and ask what the current state of SRS is fo</description>
<pubDate>27 Mar  2006 08:18:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/26614</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why SRS really sucks</title>
<description>This is to all Persons thinking SRS is usable.  I will show you with empirical logic that SRS really sucks.  1. SRS makes a good thing as SPF rea</description>
<pubDate>26 Mar  2006 18:09:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/26602</link>
</item><item>
<title>AutoResponse - Email Returned SAXK (KMM26499766V13955L0KM) :kd1</title>
<description>Thank you for contacting PayPal Customer Service. In an effort to assist you as quickly and efficiently as possible, please direct all customer servi</description>
<pubDate>16 Mar  2006 04:59:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/26523</link>
</item><item>
<title>spfd vs postfix</title>
<description>Hi| I&amp;#039;m using postfix 2.2.3 with perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1-1 and spfd (# $Id: spfd 141 2006-02-07 00:04:51Z julian $) Then I did the following $</description>
<pubDate>15 Mar  2006 12:25:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/26511</link>
</item><item>
<title>Weird problem with srs-socketmapd.0.32rc3.pl</title>
<description>I set up the 0.32rc3 installation on multiple servers and tested them to be sure SRS was working and mails were getting through, especially forwardi</description>
<pubDate>22 Dec  2005 13:29:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/25302</link>
</item><item>
<title>Errors with socketmapd.0.31.pl</title>
<description>Newly compiled Sendmail 8.13.5, linked to libsrs2 in site.config.m4 with this line: APPENDDEF(`conf_sendmail_LIBS&amp;#039;, `-lsrs2&amp;#039;). Compiler (gcc 3.3.6)</description>
<pubDate>19 Dec  2005 13:05:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/25268</link>
</item><item>
<title>Debian exim4 SRS forward only how-to</title>
<description>Hi All, I have a forwarding service running on Debian box and I got into the SRS topic only because my mail forwarding stopped to work. I suppose I</description>
<pubDate>19 Dec  2005 03:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/25264</link>
</item><item>
<title>socketmapd.0.31.pl file system location</title>
<description>Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I&amp;#039;m brand new to this list and to SRS. I&amp;#039;m trying to install the latest stable socketmap method but the tarb</description>
<pubDate>18 Dec  2005 15:59:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/25251</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS whitelist</title>
<description>In the article posted at http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7328 Meng Wong states: The people who developed SPF use eBay, too, and they don&amp;#039;t want t</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2005 10:37:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/24817</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF of course</title>
<description>My mail server has SPF built into it and I&amp;#039;ve added the TXT record for all domains that I host...all 76 to be exact...tedious but worth it. My questio</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2005 03:45:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/24302</link>
</item><item>
<title>greylisting and MAIL FROM signing</title>
<description>I have run into a sort of impedance mismatch between MAIL FROM signing and greylisting.  1. I send a message with signed MAIL FROM (old SES) 2. rec</description>
<pubDate>16 Aug  2005 12:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/23265</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS patch for postfix</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I&amp;#039;ve polished the postfix patch from http://www.libsrs2.org/ to more or less work and not segfault.</description>
<pubDate>04 Aug  2005 12:21:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/22921</link>
</item><item>
<title>Question abour SRS in sendmail</title>
<description>Hi,    I&amp;#039;ve read about the Mail SRS and the problem of the forwarded e-mail. I thing I got this problem. Some accounts in my server needs to be for</description>
<pubDate>19 Jul  2005 06:08:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/21481</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS comments/questions</title>
<description>In Shevek&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;The Sender Rewriting Scheme&amp;quot; (6/5/2004 version), Section 4.3 (The Timestamp) it says the timestamp has 1-day resolution mod 2^10, which</description>
<pubDate>15 Jul  2005 20:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/21451</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mail::SRS usage</title>
<description>Hi all, I run a forwarding service and I have some questions about the use of Mail::SRS. I use courier as my MTA, and the forwarding is done via per</description>
<pubDate>08 Jul  2005 11:47:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/21249</link>
</item><item>
<title>[no subject]</title>
<description>--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or te</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2005 03:40:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/19498</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS_ENOTREWRITTEN?</title>
<description>Hi, And yet another question I would like to bother you with... When srs_reverse() gives SRS_ENOTREWRITTEN back as subtye of SRS_ERRTYPE_NONE, what</description>
<pubDate>13 Apr  2005 02:24:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/18857</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cascaded Rewriting</title>
<description>Hello, I am planning to use libsrs2 for our mail system. It will replace our own rewriting scheme. My question is, what happens if cascaded encoding</description>
<pubDate>12 Apr  2005 07:40:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/18840</link>
</item><item>
<title>exim4</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;d like to know how to support SRS with exim mailserver. While usually making use of the (exim4) Debian-packages, I compiled exim-4.50 with</description>
<pubDate>09 Apr  2005 13:33:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/18832</link>
</item><item>
<title>Postfix patch ?</title>
<description>Hello there, Seems that postfix SRS patch is still for 2.1.4 ;( We have now 2.2.x branch without patch (the SPF patch is well maintained, but the SR</description>
<pubDate>05 Apr  2005 01:34:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/18760</link>
</item><item>
<title>libsrs_alt-1.0rc1</title>
<description>In case anyone still reads this list... http://srs.mirtol.com/ Miles. ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your s</description>
<pubDate>04 Apr  2005 08:58:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/18737</link>
</item><item>
<title>Qmail Patch Info</title>
<description>I have been looking around and googling for information regarding implementing SRS with Qmail. I have seen the information provided by Greg Wooledge</description>
<pubDate>21 Mar  2005 09:00:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/18320</link>
</item><item>
<title>libsrs2 and Exim4</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry if this is a covered topic, but I didn&amp;#039;t find nothing about it in my google attempts. Has anyone successfully implemented SRS support from l</description>
<pubDate>15 Mar  2005 17:45:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/18186</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] SPF Routines For Windows and VB .Net</title>
<description>Hi, (repost from spf-devel). I&amp;#039;ve downloaded SPF Routines For Windows (v1.10) Any idea on how to reference the RMSPF.DLL in a VB .Net Project I ge</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2005 04:57:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/17317</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] SPF implementations for sendmail with fake DSN detection via SRS?</title>
<description>Are there any SPF implementations for sendmail that include fake DSN detection and blocking via SRS *other than* http://spf.pobox.com/sendmail-milt</description>
<pubDate>30 Nov  2004 15:29:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/15776</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] Help - How to unwind an SRS address?</title>
<description>Hi, Please can someone give me a regex or *simple* instructions on how to reconstruct the real senders email address from an SRS one (pref without in</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2004 03:00:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/15148</link>
</item><item>
<title>Out of Office AutoReply: [srs-discuss] Digest 1.39 for srs-discus s</title>
<description>Hi! Thank you for contacting eBags.  Unfortuneately, Mary Beth Ellis is no longer with the eBags&amp;#039; marketing team.  If you are trying to reach Mary</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2004 08:52:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/13331</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] Fwd: [Fwd: SRS problem]</title>
<description>A guy using libsrs_alt with Exim has found this problem: &amp;gt;It looks to me as if Yahoo are sending out stuff (junk probably!) using &amp;gt;the legitimate (i</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2004 06:02:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/12884</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] Implementing Mail::SRS in MIMEDefang</title>
<description>After successfully implementing Mail::SPF::Query in MIMEDefang[1] and getting SPF TXT records implemented in the zone files for the various domains I</description>
<pubDate>03 Oct  2004 09:28:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/12549</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] Problems effectively using SPF with SRS</title>
<description>Let&amp;#039;s say that I want to whitelist hotmail.com, because they publish SPF records and ratelimit outgoing mail on a per user basis. My email address is</description>
<pubDate>20 Sep  2004 15:41:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/11907</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] How dou you persuade Apache.org to use SRS</title>
<description>Hi Now that Spamassassin is hosted/redirected by Apache.org, I cannot send/receive to/from their mailing list. It seems they do not use SRS and I a</description>
<pubDate>19 Sep  2004 05:48:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/11871</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] pysrs-0.30.9 supports sendmail socketmap</title>
<description>pysrs is a Python translation of the Perl reference SRS implementation. RPM tested on RedHat 7.2, 7.3, 9.  http://bmsi.com/python/pysrs.html --</description>
<pubDate>01 Sep  2004 12:09:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/11088</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] Re: SRS on Exim: alias not set properly?</title>
<description>Hi Miles, Thanks for your response! The deliver_domain is indeed local when dealing with forwards.  However, there are other cases when email is se</description>
<pubDate>31 Aug  2004 08:13:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/11046</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] SRS forward on Exim?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m testing libsrs_alt-0.4 using Exiscan ACL 4.42-27 on Exim 4.42.  However, SRS sender addresses wind up in this format: SRS0=(secrethash)=(dateha</description>
<pubDate>30 Aug  2004 10:07:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/11001</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] SRS and postfix MTA</title>
<description>Good morning! I am new on the list. First I have question about archives - where can I find it? Second I have problems with configuring of the POST</description>
<pubDate>23 Aug  2004 04:35:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/10552</link>
</item><item>
<title>[srs-discuss] libsrs_alt-0.4</title>
<description>Hi, Have now removed OpenSSL dependancy from libsrs_alt. No other changes in this release. Miles. ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or</description>
<pubDate>29 Jul  2004 11:24:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/9237</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [srs-discuss] The future of spf.infinitepenguins.net</title>
<description>let me know when this is ready for mirroring/syncing...as discussed.  Michael Weiner ________________________________ From: owner-srs-discuss@v2.li</description>
<pubDate>27 Jul  2004 09:45:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/9014</link>
</item><item>
<title>spfTools.net; A Call for all SPF related tools</title>
<description>Everyone, spfTools.net (Sender Policy Framework Tools Network) is a new site available to the community that will be launching in the near future. I</description>
<pubDate>25 Jul  2004 07:44:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8857</link>
</item><item>
<title>The future of spf.infinitepenguins.net</title>
<description>Everyone, As you may or may not have noticed spf.infinitepenguins.net (&amp;quot;S.IP&amp;quot;) became stable and extremely fast. This positive change is the result</description>
<pubDate>25 Jul  2004 07:42:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8856</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why has Wayne stolen my domain?</title>
<description>Everyone, For several weeks now I have been politely requesting that both Wayne and Shevek desist from their use of the libspf2.org and libsrs2.org d</description>
<pubDate>24 Jul  2004 05:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8846</link>
</item><item>
<title>Minimum length of secret key</title>
<description>One rule in cryptography is to use the same key only once. But SRS (or SES) uses the same secret key for many different email addresses. So the secret</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2004 21:06:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8843</link>
</item><item>
<title>New parameters for libsrs2</title>
<description>I have forwarded this entire mail to libsrs2@rt.anarres.org so it is now in the bug queue. I expect to have these imlpemented after this weekend. No</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2004 04:08:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8836</link>
</item><item>
<title>Postfix SRS Patch ?</title>
<description>Hi there, Has anybody had any success with the http://www.libsrs2.org/patch/postfix-libsrs2-2.0.19-1.patch Postfix patch ? I have patched a Mandrak</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2004 15:06:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8831</link>
</item><item>
<title>Implementing SRS on IMail</title>
<description>Hi, Please let me know if there is an archive where I could find the answer to this query. We have an IMail server running on Windows. We forward m</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2004 05:13:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8830</link>
</item><item>
<title>libsrs_alt v0.3 (now compliant)</title>
<description>If you&amp;#039;re interested in libsrs_alt read on. ----------------------------------- libsrs_alt-0.3 released, available at http://srs.mirtol.com/ THIS</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2004 07:17:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8828</link>
</item><item>
<title>More on Testing SRS</title>
<description>Interesting i just got a bounce from the dk mailing list on sourceforge. net as in the following: The original message was received at Sun, 13 Jun 20</description>
<pubDate>13 Jun  2004 08:15:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8805</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-discuss] GMX</title>
<description>On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 06:21, Ernesto Baschny wrote: &amp;gt; Hi! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I gladly noticed that one of the biggest german Email-providers (GMX) &amp;gt; is now on the S</description>
<pubDate>13 Jun  2004 06:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8797</link>
</item><item>
<title>Testing SRS</title>
<description>Dear List I am about to implement SPF - so far short periods of testing when the mail traffic is low seem to be OK . I was hoping you could point m</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2004 16:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8794</link>
</item><item>
<title>libsrs_alt-0.2 released</title>
<description>Just a note to let you know version 0.2 is now out. Details follow. Miles.  The library seems quite stable and bug-free with no bugs _reported_ from</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2004 07:58:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8793</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim bouncing to exchange</title>
<description>It would be nice, in general, if incoming SRS addresses were also validated in the ACL in this way. S. -- Shevek</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2004 02:11:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8786</link>
</item><item>
<title>Alternative C Implementation</title>
<description>Dear all, I have created an alternative C implementation of SRS available at http://srs.mirtol.com . It includes a patch for Exim. Any comments welc</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2004 06:39:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8783</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS implemenation in sendmail</title>
<description>In the page http://asarian-host.net/srs/sendmailsrs.htm an SRS integration with sendmail is presented. It is implied in the opening paragraphs that</description>
<pubDate>24 May  2004 18:09:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8771</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;quot;send to a friend&amp;quot; from websites</title>
<description>We have published SRS records, and they are tested and working fine.  However, we have &amp;quot;send this article to a friend&amp;quot; functionality on our website,</description>
<pubDate>18 May  2004 09:17:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8766</link>
</item><item>
<title>BASE64 encoding of SRS hash may not work with some mail servers</title>
<description>On 05-May-04 I wrote (to spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com): &amp;gt; I have found out so far that the only characters in email addresses &amp;gt; accepted by all mail se</description>
<pubDate>10 May  2004 07:54:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8753</link>
</item><item>
<title>unSigned Envelope Sender</title>
<description>Readers might be interested to know about my current ad-hoc bounce verification scheme. I send email with an envelope from address which is almost com</description>
<pubDate>01 May  2004 08:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8728</link>
</item><item>
<title>CBV</title>
<description>On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:42:04PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote: | | Meng has produced and published slides which correctly, IMHO, argue that the | some</description>
<pubDate>29 Apr  2004 10:51:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8690</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-help] SRS for Exim</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m reposting to the SRS list: So for exim4 there&amp;#039;s:  http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html But, I&amp;#039;m not really clear if that&amp;#039;s *the* recommend soluti</description>
<pubDate>28 Apr  2004 13:45:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8681</link>
</item><item>
<title>ANNOUNCE sendmail-milter-spf version 1.41</title>
<description>I am glad to announce a new release of spf-milter:   sendmail-milter-spf-1.41 This point release features but one major addition: the use of a whi</description>
<pubDate>26 Apr  2004 22:43:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8680</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SRS concern</title>
<description>On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:56:18PM -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: | | It would seem that perhaps I shouldn&amp;#039;t use it, until it is a complete | solut</description>
<pubDate>13 Apr  2004 13:17:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8678</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS &amp;amp; Postfix</title>
<description>I sent the following to Meng Wong, who suggested that I post it here, for public discussion. I&amp;#039;m brand-new to SPF/SRS, having just published my SPF</description>
<pubDate>11 Apr  2004 12:41:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8675</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF records published for joeykelly.net</title>
<description>Hey all, I&amp;#039;ve just added an SPF TXT record for joeykelly.net, which I own. Once I&amp;#039;ve tested it to my satisfaction, I&amp;#039;ve got about half a dozen other</description>
<pubDate>10 Apr  2004 19:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8674</link>
</item><item>
<title>Is there a place for RRS - a recipient rewriting scheme.</title>
<description>Hi, SRS was created to try to overcome a perceived problem with SPF. That problem being that SPF cannot reliably assess mail that has passed throug</description>
<pubDate>01 Apr  2004 19:12:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8668</link>
</item><item>
<title>srs implementation?</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I implemented SPF for postfix and in my DNS with no problems but I am afraid the SRS thing still eludes</description>
<pubDate>31 Mar  2004 21:09:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8667</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS and Sendmail aliases</title>
<description>A couple of the local users here are actually off-site so mail is forwarded to them using the sendmail aliases mechanism. As we run SPF I would also l</description>
<pubDate>29 Mar  2004 01:19:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8664</link>
</item><item>
<title>ANNOUNCE sendmail-milter-spf version 1.40</title>
<description>I am glad to announce a new release of spf-milter:   sendmail-milter-spf-1.40 The major highlights of this release are: * New feature: spf-milter</description>
<pubDate>27 Mar  2004 03:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8663</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: OT: SPF neutral</title>
<description>On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:57:10AM -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: &amp;gt; I have attached the current incarnation of pysrs.m4, which is trivial &amp;gt; to change</description>
<pubDate>26 Mar  2004 09:52:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8662</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS sendmail integration</title>
<description>Hi! I just joined the list, but I&amp;#039;ve been reading through the archives (somewhat crazy: jumping from spf-discuss to here). Is there a &amp;quot;working&amp;quot; m4</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2004 19:45:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8658</link>
</item><item>
<title>SRS and local domains</title>
<description>When NO_SRS_FROM_LOCAL is defined, then mail from local domains (Cw) is never SRS encoded. Currently, when NO_SRS_FROM_LOCAL is not defined, then mai</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2004 16:30:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8656</link>
</item><item>
<title>I&amp;#039;m back</title>
<description>Mina-san (everyone), I&amp;#039;m &amp;quot;back&amp;quot; so to speak. Just a quick note to apologize for my lack of presence, I&amp;#039;ve started a new job and now into my fourth w</description>
<pubDate>24 Mar  2004 21:50:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8650</link>
</item><item>
<title>FYI: GMX implements return path rewriting</title>
<description>GMX (www.gmx.net), a large email provider in the German language areas of Europe (.de/.at/.ch/.li), seems to have implemented some form of homegrown r</description>
<pubDate>24 Mar  2004 09:50:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8639</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-discuss] SRS sendmail integration</title>
<description>On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Alain Knaff wrote: &amp;gt; It is sendmail that is smart enough to do the merging. If there are &amp;gt; several S lines with the same ruleset</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2004 13:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8627</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-discuss] SRS and secondary MX</title>
<description>On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Alain Knaff wrote: &amp;gt; In case anybody is interested, attached is the srs.m4 file that we are &amp;gt; using on lll.lu &amp;amp; linux.lu . &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2004 12:25:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8625</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: case folding and brute force attack!</title>
<description>We should maybe move this thread to srs-discuss. On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:30:55PM -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: | | More interesting, I am getti</description>
<pubDate>19 Mar  2004 17:35:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8615</link>
</item><item>
<title>The open relay problem.</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m new and have been pouring over the archives of the spf and srs lists trying to get up to speed.  I would like to make comment about the par</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2004 15:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8601</link>
</item><item>
<title>srs2envtol</title>
<description>Last week, while making a change to the srs2envtol script in my sendmail implementation of SRS, I forgot to paste two lines back in that munge the add</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2004 05:54:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8600</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-discuss] SRS and RCPT TO: question</title>
<description>----- Original Message ----- From: &amp;quot;Jeremy T. Bouse&amp;quot; &amp;lt;jeremy+spf@undergrid.net&amp;gt; To: &amp;lt;spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com&amp;gt; Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 6:34 AM</description>
<pubDate>11 Mar  2004 23:27:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8598</link>
</item><item>
<title>Possible modification to Mail::SRS</title>
<description>After recently implimenting both SPF and SRS on the mail servers for my home network I did run into a problem with Mail::SRS v0.29 that I believe I ha</description>
<pubDate>11 Mar  2004 13:01:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/8597</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
