Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 08 Nov 2009 17:46:47 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi, I've been looking at SRS and noticed that on the status page ( http://www.libsrs2.org/status.html) the patch for postfix is listed as broken. Is 06 Oct 2008 08:30:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34201 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rob MacGregor wrote: > Hannah Schroeter wrote: > > Could a kind list admin unsubscribe this member? I g 10 Aug 2008 08:25:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34072 I don't know what it is or who subscribed it to srs-discuss, but it is now on my global blacklist. -- Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi. 07 Aug 2008 13:35:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34070 On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > assume I need to run something that will allow the rewriteing. What does > > any one suggest to us 07 Aug 2008 13:00:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34069 On Thursday 07 August 2008 15:04, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > Until postfix allows plugins to modify MAIL FROM (are you sure that is > still an issue? 07 Aug 2008 12:18:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34068 On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote: > I have finally come to the point where I have a couple of clients that > refuse to move to exim or sen 07 Aug 2008 12:04:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34067 Hello, I have finally come to the point where I have a couple of clients that refuse to move to exim or sendmail for their mail servers. I am looki 07 Aug 2008 11:21:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34066 Hi! On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 03:46:37PM +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote: >On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 15:15, Hannah Schroeter <hannah@schlund.de> wrote: >> Coul 06 Aug 2008 08:00:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34064 On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 15:15, Hannah Schroeter <hannah@schlund.de> wrote: > Hi! > > Could a kind list admin unsubscribe this member? I get this in > " 06 Aug 2008 07:46:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34063 Hi! Could a kind list admin unsubscribe this member? I get this in "response" to each mail to srs-discuss. Kind regards, Hannah. ----- Forwarded m 06 Aug 2008 07:15:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34062 Hi! On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 03:36:03PM +0200, Jakob Jensen wrote: >Yes, the SMTP dialogue seems to be correct as well >from my mail.log: >from=<SRS0 06 Aug 2008 06:52:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34061 Jakob Jensen wrote: > I have setup SRS on one of my mail servers that is used for email forwarding. It seems the header is correctly rewritten. In a e 06 Aug 2008 06:48:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34060 Yes, the SMTP dialogue seems to be correct as well from my mail.log: from=<SRS0=HHHH=YY=origdomain.com=user@forward.com> regards, Jakob -----Origi 06 Aug 2008 06:36:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34059 Hi! On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 02:48:11PM +0200, Jakob Jensen wrote: >I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question, but I couldn't find 06 Aug 2008 06:19:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34058 On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Jakob Jensen wrote: > Return-Path:SRS0=HHHH=YY=origdomain.com=user@forward.com > > My problems is that, when the server I forward 06 Aug 2008 06:01:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34055 Hi, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question, but I couldn't find any other place I have setup SRS on one of my mail servers tha 06 Aug 2008 05:48:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/34054 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com> wrote: > > Pysrs currently does not require pymilter. It is a socketd and CF cod 08 May 2008 23:03:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33742 On Thu, 8 May 2008, Rob MacGregor wrote: > > Which is similar to what you'd get with an SRS only milter in python. > > Thanks. I'll have another lo 08 May 2008 16:44:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33740 On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com> wrote: > > If it is anything like the pysrs no-srs-mailers config, it looks like 08 May 2008 15:36:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33739 On Mon, 5 May 2008, Rob MacGregor wrote: > The only problem is, it SRS re-writes even for local delivery (via the > cyrusv2 mailer). I did find srs_ 08 May 2008 14:46:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33738 I'm trying to integrate SRS with my Sendmail mail server as I forward a small quantity of email to a webmail account. I've gone with srs-socketmapd a 05 May 2008 11:35:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33713 On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, J. David Rye of Roadtech wrote: > What is bothering me is that I have at leased 1 server that sends mail > from several domains 25 Apr 2008 18:39:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33691 On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, J. David Rye of Roadtech wrote: > Does anyone have any sugestion or experience of using SRS with using > this or any other impli 25 Apr 2008 18:29:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33690 Hi I have been looking for a SRS implimentaton to use with sendmail. I Like the concept of sendmail.srs especially in in its SRS-socketmap form. It 25 Apr 2008 16:57:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33689 On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Cliff Nieuwenhuis wrote: > The recipient is someone at platecoinc.com. The MX record for platecoinc.com > has mail going to se 23 Apr 2008 11:44:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33665 I need help solving a situation where a sender's message is being rejected after going through a legitimate e-mail spam/virus filtering service. He 23 Apr 2008 11:29:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33664 -----Original Message----- From: Jesper Mårtenson [mailto:jesper@maartenson.net] Sent: dinsdag 26 februari 2008 9:53 To: srs-discuss@v2.listbox.com Su 27 Feb 2008 03:15:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33334 On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jesper Mårtenson wrote: > I'm using SRS on a couple of my mailservers. But I've seem to run into > some problems, usually meani 26 Feb 2008 10:51:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33332 Hi! I'm using SRS on a couple of my mailservers. But I've seem to run into some problems, usually meaning that some of my users can´t seem to mail 26 Feb 2008 00:47:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33325 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, David Erickson wrote: > > >>>> That would be a problem with the python library. I will add a test 13 Feb 2008 11:52:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33307 On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, David Erickson wrote: > >> That would be a problem with the python library. I will add a test case. > > Thanks for the reply S 13 Feb 2008 10:22:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33306 David Erickson wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, David Erickson wrote: >> >> >>> I am working with the pysrs library and ha 12 Feb 2008 22:27:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33305 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, David Erickson wrote: > > >> I am working with the pysrs library and have been doing some testing a 12 Feb 2008 21:36:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33304 On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, David Erickson wrote: > I am working with the pysrs library and have been doing some testing and > when i give it a _legal_ (al 12 Feb 2008 20:25:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33303 I am working with the pysrs library and have been doing some testing and when i give it a _legal_ (albeit rarely if ever used) email address of "Bla 12 Feb 2008 18:32:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/33302 On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, David MacQuigg wrote: > Tom, thanks for your help. > > At 04:46 PM 1/2/2008 -0800, you wrote: > > >Recompile sendmail from sour 03 Jan 2008 12:31:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32969 Tom, thanks for your help. At 04:46 PM 1/2/2008 -0800, you wrote: >Recompile sendmail from source with socket map support (-DSOCKETMAP). >In the dev 03 Jan 2008 12:19:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32965 On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, David MacQuigg wrote: > >You are correct that the original function of SRS to enable forwarders to > >pass SPF with naive clients 03 Jan 2008 12:11:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32964 On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Stuart Gathman wrote: >On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, David MacQuigg wrote: > >> between the latest SRS and EL4. I'm considering dropping SR 03 Jan 2008 10:28:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32963 On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, David MacQuigg wrote: > between the latest SRS and EL4. I'm considering dropping SRS, since hardly > anyone is using it, but I w 03 Jan 2008 08:29:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32956 On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, David MacQuigg wrote: > We upgraded our installation of Redhat Linux from EL3 to EL4, and everything > worked after the reboot ex 03 Jan 2008 08:18:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32954 Recompile sendmail from source with socket map support (-DSOCKETMAP). In the devtools/Site/site.config.m4 file you'll need a line like: APPENDDEF(`co 02 Jan 2008 16:46:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32953 We upgraded our installation of Redhat Linux from EL3 to EL4, and everything worked after the reboot except SRS. Looks like there may be a problem be 02 Jan 2008 14:45:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/32952 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mathias, Matthias Wimmer wrote: > As I wrote two days ago, I have written a small utility to do SRS 19 Mar 2007 12:22:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/31305 As I wrote two days ago, I have written a small utility to do SRS forwarding with the Courier mailserver. The first small documentation for it has b 17 Mar 2007 09:30:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/31282 Hi! I have written a small program using libsrs2 to be used with courier to do SRS address rewriting when forwarding messages today. I will publish 15 Mar 2007 17:21:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/31249 Hi! Is libsrs2 dead? The website on libsrs2.org is off and I could also not contact any of the mail addresses when I tried to send the attached e-ma 15 Mar 2007 13:27:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/31242 On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > something@epronar.com it calls back with > > sender_verification@sandiegort.com Is there away to ge 15 Jan 2007 18:19:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/30331 Thanks Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Chris Sweeney wrote: > > >> do you know if there is an RFC that states the proper way to do 15 Jan 2007 14:24:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/30326 On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Chris Sweeney wrote: > do you know if there is an RFC that states the proper way to do callbacks? Its called RFC2821. Callback 15 Jan 2007 09:05:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/30287 do you know if there is an RFC that states the proper way to do callbacks? Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Chris Sweeney wrote: > > 14 Jan 2007 22:24:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/30264 On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Chris Sweeney wrote: > OK I have to ask for help now. I have a user that is unable to send > email because of what I consider b 14 Jan 2007 21:29:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/30258 OK I have to ask for help now. I have a user that is unable to send email because of what I consider broken call back. When this particular place do 14 Jan 2007 21:17:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/30257 Hi All, I am trying to implement SRS in my .forward. I have the following in the .forward. In this case "othersrs" is the srs in /usr/local/bin/, 07 Dec 2006 01:25:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29534 On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Seth Goodman wrote: > I use Outhouse and send mail through some MTA's on port 587, some on > port 465. What is the problem you s 02 Dec 2006 08:24:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29374 ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1129 01 Dec 2006 19:33:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29366 Stuart D. Gathman wrote on Friday, December 01, 2006 8:57 AM -0600: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, wayne wrote: > > > Some people have also suggested that by 01 Dec 2006 18:24:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29365 On 12/1/06 6:51 PM, "wayne" <wayne@schlitt.net> wrote: > Hmmm... Details you say? OK. Julian gave a short reply, here is a > longer one. > > > Whe 01 Dec 2006 16:37:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29363 In <C195B116.153EF%hunter@userfriendly.net> Michael Weiner <hunter@userfriendly.net> writes: > On 12/1/06 10:08 AM, "wayne" <wayne@schlitt.net> wrote 01 Dec 2006 15:51:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29362 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Weiner wrote: > On 12/1/06 10:08 AM, "wayne" <wayne@schlitt.net> wrote: > > This is actually on 01 Dec 2006 15:32:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29361 wayne writes: > In <17776.15222.910009.720786@saint.heaven.net> "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters@netheaven.com> writes: > > > If you use SRS to reject bog 01 Dec 2006 13:20:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29360 On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 10:39 -0500, John A. Martin wrote: > > David> Postfix gets this wrong -- it does callouts to the MAILFROM > David> addr 01 Dec 2006 09:49:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29355 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dick St.Peters [mailto:stpeters@netheaven.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 15:26 > To: srs-discuss@v2.listbo 01 Dec 2006 08:18:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29346 > -----Original Message----- > From: Stuart D. Gathman [mailto:stuart@bmsi.com] > Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 15:57 > To: SRS discussions > Subject 01 Dec 2006 08:09:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29345 > -----Original Message----- > From: wayne [mailto:wayne@schlitt.net] > Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 15:40 > To: SRS discussions > Subject: Re: [srs 01 Dec 2006 07:59:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29344 >>>>> "David" == David Woodhouse >>>>> "Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?" >>>>> Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:13:20 +0000 David> P 01 Dec 2006 07:39:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29343 On 12/1/06 10:08 AM, "wayne" <wayne@schlitt.net> wrote: > > This is actually one place that SPF can help, even if you prefer other > systems. By put 01 Dec 2006 07:14:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29354 On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 08:51 -0600, wayne wrote: > In <17776.15222.910009.720786@saint.heaven.net> "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters@netheaven.com> writes: > 01 Dec 2006 07:13:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29342 In <Pine.LNX.4.44.0612010948500.14609-100000@bmsred.bmsi.com> "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart@bmsi.com> writes: > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, wayne wrote: > >> D 01 Dec 2006 07:08:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29341 On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, wayne wrote: > Doesn't doing SRS on all outgoing email cause problems with certain > mailing lists (ezlm?), vacation programs and 01 Dec 2006 06:56:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29340 In <17776.15222.910009.720786@saint.heaven.net> "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters@netheaven.com> writes: > If you use SRS to reject bogus DSNs, you will als 01 Dec 2006 06:51:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29339 On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 08:39 -0600, wayne wrote: > Doesn't doing SRS on all outgoing email cause problems with certain > mailing lists (ezlm?), vacatio 01 Dec 2006 06:48:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29338 In <200612011232.kB1CWW2n038619@asarian-host.net> Mark <admin@asarian-host.net> writes: > I use SRS on *all* outgoing mail. It's extremely useful for 01 Dec 2006 06:39:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29337 David Woodhouse writes: > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 12:22 +0000, Camart Ltd wrote: > > Aha! That was my next question - whether it is easy/possible to us 01 Dec 2006 06:25:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29334 On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, David Woodhouse wrote: > > i think (please correct me if i'm wrong!) this would cause spf failure > > .... if someone@domain.com 01 Dec 2006 06:04:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29333 On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:32:55 -0500 "John A. Martin" <jam@jamux.com> wrote: >>>>>> "Mark" == Mark >>>>>> "RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avo 01 Dec 2006 05:44:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29332 >>>>> "Mark" == Mark >>>>> "RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?" >>>>> Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:32:36 GMT Mark> I use SRS on *al 01 Dec 2006 05:32:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29331 On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 12:22 +0000, Camart Ltd wrote: > Aha! That was my next question - whether it is easy/possible to use SRS > for *relay* rather 01 Dec 2006 05:00:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29330 Mark wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Camart Ltd [mailto:office@camart.co.uk] >>Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 13:25 >>To: srs-discuss@v2. 01 Dec 2006 04:45:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29329 > -----Original Message----- > From: Camart Ltd [mailto:office@camart.co.uk] > Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 13:25 > To: srs-discuss@v2.listbox.com > 01 Dec 2006 04:32:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29328 David Woodhouse wrote: >On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 13:22 +0000, Camart Office wrote: > > >>hi folks, >> >>i would like to provide a private SMTP relay s 01 Dec 2006 04:22:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29327 > -----Original Message----- > From: David Woodhouse [mailto:dwmw2@infradead.org] > Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 11:13 > To: srs-discuss@v2.listbox.c 01 Dec 2006 04:20:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29326 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Woodhouse wrote: > I recommend that you don't use SRS on forwarded mail. If you find you > have p 01 Dec 2006 02:45:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29325 On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 13:22 +0000, Camart Office wrote: > hi folks, > > i would like to provide a private SMTP relay so anyone (with any email > add 01 Dec 2006 02:12:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29324 On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Camart Office wrote: > i would like to provide a private SMTP relay so anyone (with any email > address) on a particular networ 30 Nov 2006 08:08:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29321 hi folks, i would like to provide a private SMTP relay so anyone (with any email address) on a particular network could use this SMTP server for out 30 Nov 2006 05:22:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/29312 On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Dick St.Peters wrote: > Blum, Gabriel writes: > > >> SRS for forwarding is only needed by forwarders with > > clueless/powerless 19 Aug 2006 21:53:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28076 Blum, Gabriel writes: > >> SRS for forwarding is only needed by forwarders with > clueless/powerless clients. > > Agree, but unfortunately that's wha 18 Aug 2006 09:22:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28065 On 8/17/06, Dan <subs@kronhead.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the answer. I started to suspect that as I composed the > question. > > On the other hand, 18 Aug 2006 01:11:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28064 Thanks for the answer. I started to suspect that as I composed the question. On the other hand, I just subscribed to an open office announcement list 17 Aug 2006 15:11:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28063 >>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart D Gathman >>>>> "RE: Re: SRS for postfix ?" >>>>> Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:21:17 -0400 (EDT) Stuart> It is not at all necess 17 Aug 2006 13:12:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28062 Hello, >> I think the authors/promoters of SPF/SRS should engage directly in >> this >> issue and provide the community with good and simple >> 17 Aug 2006 13:05:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28061 >> SRS for forwarding is only needed by forwarders with clueless/powerless clients. Agree, but unfortunately that's what plenty of big companies are, 17 Aug 2006 13:04:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28060 On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Blum, Gabriel wrote: > I think the authors/promoters of SPF/SRS should engage directly in this > issue and provide the community 17 Aug 2006 12:21:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28059 >> Apart from that paragraph, the preceding references to the Postfix architecture may be a bit better. >> I do not however grok the implementation 17 Aug 2006 11:42:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28058 On Thursday 17 August 2006 12:38, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > The code included implies that patching Postfix is the only way to > implement SRS. I w 17 Aug 2006 11:33:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28057 >>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart D Gathman >>>>> "Re: Re: SRS for postfix ?" >>>>> Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:38:21 -0400 (EDT) Stuart> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Jo 17 Aug 2006 10:42:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28056 On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, John A. Martin wrote: > Is this any help > <http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0401/1020.html>? No. It is a rant against SRS 17 Aug 2006 09:38:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28055 >>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart D Gathman >>>>> "Re: SRS for postfix ?" >>>>> Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:15:30 -0400 (EDT) Stuart> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Scott 17 Aug 2006 08:48:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28054 On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Scott Kitterman wrote: > There is pymilter that includes an SRS capability: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymilter > > 17 Aug 2006 08:15:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/srs/28053