cy31_tra at yahoo
Jun 15, 2008, 3:14 PM
Post #3 of 11
(2331 views)
Permalink
|
This is what I set up yesterday when I attempted to set up a SPF record with as follows http://www.findyourtraffic.com/739086/traleo.info
This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
service at verifier.port25.com. The service allows email senders to perform
a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided
free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While
it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
<verifier-feedback [at] port25>.
Thank you for using the verifier,
The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team
==============================
============================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check: pass
DomainKeys check: pass
DKIM check: fail
Sender-ID check: pass
SpamAssassin check: ham
==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================
HELO hostname: ag-out-0708.google.com
Source IP: 72.14.246.250
mail-from: traleo34 [at] gmail
----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=traleo34 [at] gmail
DNS record(s):
gmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com"
_spf.google.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ?all"
----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=traleo34 [at] gmail
DNS record(s):
gamma._domainkey.gmail.com. 300 IN TXT "k=rsa; t=y; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDIhyR3oItOy22ZOaBrIVe9m/iME3RqOJeasANSpg2YTHTYV+Xtp4xwf5gTjCmHQEMOs0qYu0FYiNQPQogJ2t0Mfx9zNu06rfRBDjiIU9tpx2T+NGlWZ8qhbiLo5By8apJavLyqTLavyPSrvsx0B3YzC63T4Age2CDqZYA+OwSMWQIDAQAB"
----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: fail (wrong body hash: expected frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=)
ID(s) verified: header.From=traleo34 [at] gmail
Canonicalized Headers:
domainkey-signature:a=rsa-sha1;'20'c=nofws;'20'd=gmail.com;'20's=gamma;'20'h=date:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject'20':content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id;'20'b=YcxUH1Skw21zm1+8jxIZakrVxeopZZubRc4AlOdgdcmchiDgCZ+9a0sUbrjnT3nmXw'20'fZZ/Q2QZ59Yn9dPloaRFoEHrSkPWoHZiboNIr2o4pmQnfn5p7DEmy4YytF4bDHr98U80'20'ijGCevp1OxUEhGPAc0wWkIcXZaxwqx8rEKQUw='0D''0A'
received:from'20'?192.168.1.64?'20'('20'[70.156.13.131])'20'by'20'mx.google.com'20'with'20'ESMTPS'20'id'20'g7sm6634346wra.16.2008.06.14.17.13.54'20'(version=TLSv1/SSLv3'20'cipher=RC4-MD5);'20'Sat,'20'14'20'Jun'20'2008'20'17:13:56'20'-0700'20'(PDT)'0D''0A'
received:by'20'10.70.54.19'20'with'20'SMTP'20'id'20'c19mr5341817wxa.2.1213488838318;'20'Sat,'20'14'20'Jun'20'2008'20'17:13:58'20'-0700'20'(PDT)'0D''0A'
date:Sat,'20'14'20'Jun'20'2008'20'19:13:24'20'-0500'0D''0A'
reply-to:traleo34 [at] gmail'0D''0A'
organization:Find'20'Your'20'Traffic'0D''0A'
user-agent:Thunderbird'20'2.0.0.14'20'(Windows/20080421)'0D''0A'
mime-version:1.0'0D''0A'
to:check-auth [at] verifier'0D''0A'
subject:test'0D''0A'
content-type:text/plain;'20'charset=ISO-8859-1;'20'format=flowed'0D''0A'
content-transfer-encoding:7bit'0D''0A'
from:Tracy'20'Ewing'20'<traleo34 [at] gmail>'0D''0A'
message-id:<48545ec4.073a360a.601b.ffff9df5 [at] mx>'0D''0A'
dkim-signature:v=1;'20'a=rsa-sha256;'20'c=relaxed/relaxed;'20'd=gmail.com;'20's=gamma;'20'h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:reply-to:organization'20':user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type'20':content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id;'20'bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=;'20'b=
Canonicalized Body:
'0D''0A'
DNS record(s):
NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.
----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=traleo34 [at] gmail
DNS record(s):
gmail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com"
_spf.google.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ?all"
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.2.3 (2007-08-08)
Result: ham (-0.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
2.2 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO
==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (adapted from
draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-04.txt):
==========================================================
"pass"
the message passed the authentication test.
"fail"
the message failed the authentication test.
"softfail"
the message failed the authentication test, and the authentication
method has either an explicit or implicit policy which doesn't require
successful authentication of all messages from that domain.
"neutral"
the authentication method completed without errors, but was unable
to reach either a positive or a negative result about the message.
"temperror"
a temporary (recoverable) error occurred attempting to authenticate
the sender; either the process couldn't be completed locally, or
there was a temporary failure retrieving data required for the
authentication. A later retry may produce a more final result.
"permerror"
a permanent (unrecoverable) error occurred attempting to
authenticate the sender; either the process couldn't be completed
locally, or there was a permanent failure retrieving data required
for the authentication.
==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================
Return-Path: <traleo34 [at] gmail>
Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (72.14.246.250) by verifier.port25.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r1) id hahf4e0hse84 for <check-auth [at] verifier>; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:11:51 -0400 (envelope-from <traleo34 [at] gmail>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com smtp.mail=traleo34 [at] gmail; mfrom=pass;
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com header.From=traleo34 [at] gmail; domainkeys=pass;
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com header.From=traleo34 [at] gmail; dkim=fail (wrong body hash: expected frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=);
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com header.From=traleo34 [at] gmail; pra=pass;
Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 5so7804256agb.6
for <check-auth [at] verifier>; Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:reply-to:organization
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id;
bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=;
b=iYvS6L8/s8cZOBfMcMUX/bqyj3ogcUQGQFhziAbXxTP8Arnjdd2Cn6dC5OsQuxA9dM
Dfbp8PIJenq4x2Cd+Cql+Qan6ulG4Bd7Ewu5la7nchxLXkfVjtbD4e2Dhx3YXzH2wfSf
GMYzQoAvORDj2xzLTfTVXl172jffWLoc8w6jo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=date:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id;
b=YcxUH1Skw21zm1+8jxIZakrVxeopZZubRc4AlOdgdcmchiDgCZ+9a0sUbrjnT3nmXw
fZZ/Q2QZ59Yn9dPloaRFoEHrSkPWoHZiboNIr2o4pmQnfn5p7DEmy4YytF4bDHr98U80
ijGCevp1OxUEhGPAc0wWkIcXZaxwqx8rEKQUw=
Received: by 10.70.54.19 with SMTP id c19mr5341817wxa.2.1213488838318;
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <traleo34 [at] gmail>
Received: from ?192.168.1.64? ( [70.156.13.131])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g7sm6634346wra.16.2008.06.14.17.13.54
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:13:24 -0500
Reply-To: traleo34 [at] gmail
Organization: Find Your Traffic
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: check-auth [at] verifier
Subject: test
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tracy Ewing <traleo34 [at] gmail>
Message-ID: <48545ec4.073a360a.601b.ffff9df5 [at] mx>
Even yet still before then I was getting:
(reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 5.4.6 Too many hops 27 (25 max): from <traleo34 [at] gmail> via localhost, to <fluidguy [at] webshieldmail>
and now gmail tells me that which is setting up a group mail. This one below is from a client that has written to me and I attempted to reply back I got this from gmail.
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
sweetmodelmelanie [at] sbcglobal
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: Message rejected. See http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=69585 for more information.
----- Original Message ----
From: Rob MacGregor <rob.macgregor [at] gmail>
To: spf-help [at] v2
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 4:14:21 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-help] Set up Question
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 21:44, Tracy Ewing <cy31_tra [at] yahoo> wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a SPF record for the buisness I'm with because I have alot of emails that are coming back DNS. the website which I am an affiliate is as follows. findyourtraffic.com/739086/traleo.info When I send out email, I use another program to send email out through Mozilla Thunderbird to access my gmail account. Since so many emails that were sent out bounced back (DNS) I can't even respond to clients that have emailed me. Do I set up a SPF record thouugh my business website out through my gmail and yahoo account?
You can only set up an SPF record if you own the domain ;)
Exactly what error message were you getting?
--
Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/1020/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1020/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/1020/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1020/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
|
