Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 00:00:49 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hello, I have an immediate pending financial transaction i would like both of us to partner for our mutual benefit. It involves a certain amount of mo 19 Aug 2011 13:46:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36190 My name is Lienka Mills and I was wondering if you are interested in exchange links, I'll place your link on my sites exactly here: pixbuffer(dot)net 25 Jul 2011 23:33:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36154 Kindly open the attached Job Details to read and send back your Job Data...... 19 Jul 2011 16:38:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36153 Hi! You have asked to subscribe to spf-help. If this is what you want, just reply to this message or click on the link below, and you will be subscrib 05 Feb 2011 05:37:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36107 We've removed list-spf-help@lists.gossamer-threads.com from spf-help. No further action is necessary. Thank you for being with us. ----------------- 07 Dec 2010 22:01:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36076 >> I know you're all excited to see another SIDF/SPF clarification >> question. :-) >> >> The doc at http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID says: >> 04 Dec 2010 12:57:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36074 On Saturday, December 04, 2010 02:04:37 pm Benny Pedersen wrote: > On lør 04 dec 2010 17:55:07 CET, Scott Kitterman wrote > > > He's talking about S 04 Dec 2010 11:23:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36073 On lør 04 dec 2010 17:55:07 CET, Scott Kitterman wrote > He's talking about Sender ID, which uses the body From, so it's not him that > needs to try 04 Dec 2010 11:04:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36072 On Saturday, December 04, 2010 10:26:43 am Benny Pedersen wrote: > On lør 04 dec 2010 02:49:22 CET, wrote > > > If using "-all", you may also face 04 Dec 2010 08:55:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36071 On lør 04 dec 2010 02:49:22 CET, wrote > If using "-all", you may also face rejection if your mail is > forwarded through a system whose IP is no 04 Dec 2010 07:26:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36070 spfhelp@caseyconnor.org wrote: >I know you're all excited to see another SIDF/SPF clarification >question. :-) > >The doc at http://www.openspf.org/S 04 Dec 2010 05:22:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36069 > >> What's worse, is Sender-ID implementations will use the SPF record if no >> Sender-ID record exists. Although Sender-ID adoption is much less an 04 Dec 2010 02:14:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36068 I know you're all excited to see another SIDF/SPF clarification question. :-) The doc at http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID says: "If you have 03 Dec 2010 17:49:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36067 Vic wrote: > http://search.cpan.org/~jenda/Mail-Sender-0.8.16/Sender.pm has the man > page for Mail::Sender. > > It specifies using the parameter "re 03 Dec 2010 09:54:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36066 Andrew Culver wrote: > Parameters > from > => the sender's e-mail address > fake_from > => the address that will be shown in headers. > If 03 Dec 2010 09:51:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36065 On Thursday, December 02, 2010 01:29:42 pm Marc Olivé wrote: > Hi, > > Let me please join your conversation in the "asking" part of it. > > Andrew, 03 Dec 2010 08:01:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36064 On Thursday, December 02, 2010 02:31:45 pm Andrew Culver wrote: > Neil Gunton wrote: > >> It is recommended, that if you do not intend for your SPF re 03 Dec 2010 07:57:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36063 Ho ricevuto il messaggio. Sono in ferie fino al 16 dicembre, legger� il messaggio al mio rientro il 17 dicembre. Per cose urgenti potete scrivere a 03 Dec 2010 07:15:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36062 Parameters from fake_from If not specified we use the value of from. It looks like you can use from to specify the SMTP MAIL FROM and then 03 Dec 2010 07:13:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36061 > Ok, I don't know how to set the SMTP MAIL FROM. I use a Perl module > called Mail::Sender, which I give parameters like 'from', 'cc' and other > hea 03 Dec 2010 00:50:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36060 Ho ricevuto il messaggio. Sono in ferie fino al 16 dicembre, legger� il messaggio al mio rientro il 17 dicembre. Per cose urgenti potete scrivere a 02 Dec 2010 19:48:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36059 On Thursday, December 02, 2010 05:33:07 pm alan wrote: > At 21:54 02/12/2010 Thursday, Derek Diget wrote: > >On Dec 2, 2010 at 12:10 -0800, Neil Gunt 02 Dec 2010 19:44:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36058 alan wrote: > At 02:04 03/12/2010 Friday, Neil Gunton wrote: >> Andrew Culver wrote: >>> No, Return-path is indicating what was used in the SMTP MAIL 02 Dec 2010 18:39:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36057 At 02:04 03/12/2010 Friday, Neil Gunton wrote: >Andrew Culver wrote: >>No, Return-path is indicating what was used in the SMTP MAIL FROM (aka envelop 02 Dec 2010 18:30:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36056 Andrew Culver wrote: > No, Return-path is indicating what was used in the SMTP MAIL FROM (aka > envelope sender). In an email you have the envelope S 02 Dec 2010 18:04:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/help/36055