hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz at gmail
Nov 14, 2011, 12:03 AM
Post #3 of 3
On 14 November 2011 08:46, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
[In reply to]
> I believe (Scott or Julian can confirm or correct me) that this comes from
> the fact that there's a definite community that wants to be able to do SPF
> based on the RFC5322.From domain, but not drag in the whole PRA algorithm.
> That's what's going on here.
That is a seriously dead draft written by Wayne Schlitt many many years ago:
Inventing something "better than PRA" is doomed, PRA is as good as possible,
and as we know not good enough. We had similar troubles in the DKIM WG with
attempts to do "something interesting" with the From header... Until folks
started to grok the Resent-From: details, or the required Sender: if there
is more than one From: author.
This is a hopeless case, the only clean solution would be a "PRA", and nobody
wants the "PRA", notably 5322 and 4409bis do not really support the concept.
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org [http://www.openspf.org]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/ [http://www.listbox.com/member/]
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/1311532-17d8a1ba
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=1311532-f2ea6ed9
Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=1311532-bdbb122a&post_id=20111114030419:4000B8C4-0E97-11E1-AFC2-B20BB85B10AF
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com