vesely at tana
Feb 4, 2011, 10:56 AM
Post #1 of 1
(367 views)
Permalink
|
|
Wording of the IP parameter, was SPFv3 proposal: rawfail result
|
|
On 04/Feb/11 17:11, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> If it is not clear in the spec that you SHOULD NOT reject on -all
> when not actually evaluated on an MX for the original RCPT TO domain, then we
> should make that clear.
Yes, please. The spec mentions that checking "can be performed
elsewhere in the mail processing chain", but then it says (twice)
<ip> - the IP address of the SMTP client that is emitting the
mail, either IPv4 or IPv6.
Formally, the client that /is emitting/ the mail is the previous hop,
isn't it? IMHO, that deserves an errata.
Perhaps the correct wording could be based on a formal definition of
border, along the lines of http://www.openspf.org/Community/Glossary
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org [http://www.openspf.org]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/ [http://www.listbox.com/member/]
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/1311532-17d8a1ba
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=1311532-f2ea6ed9
Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=1311532&id_secret=1311532-bdbb122a&post_id=20110204135636:7C561C96-3090-11E0-B944-DCC6143B8124
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
|
