Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: SPF: Discuss

spfcheck segmentation fault

 

 

SPF discuss RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


ed at alcpress

Nov 7, 2007, 12:08 PM

Post #1 of 2 (812 views)
Permalink
spfcheck segmentation fault

I'm new to the list so forgive me if this topic has
already been discussed. I've searched this list's
archive but found nothing, which is suspicious for
a problem that's so well-known.

The problem is running spfquery on an AMD X86_64
processor. When I download libspf2-1.2.5 and compile
it, I see this:

#spfquery -ip 58.9.77.1 -sender wadak [at] pacifier
Segmentation fault

I don't see this on Intel and 32-bit AMD processors.

A Google search shows numerous complaints about this
back in 2006 and I see patches for the problem. I'm
wondering why the problem hasn't been fixed in the
current software -a year later.

Ed Sawicki

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


scott at kitterman

Nov 7, 2007, 1:13 PM

Post #2 of 2 (719 views)
Permalink
Re: spfcheck segmentation fault [In reply to]

On Wednesday 07 November 2007 15:08, Ed Sawicki wrote:
> I'm new to the list so forgive me if this topic has
> already been discussed. I've searched this list's
> archive but found nothing, which is suspicious for
> a problem that's so well-known.
>
> The problem is running spfquery on an AMD X86_64
> processor. When I download libspf2-1.2.5 and compile
> it, I see this:
>
> #spfquery -ip 58.9.77.1 -sender wadak [at] pacifier
> Segmentation fault
>
> I don't see this on Intel and 32-bit AMD processors.
>
> A Google search shows numerous complaints about this
> back in 2006 and I see patches for the problem. I'm
> wondering why the problem hasn't been fixed in the
> current software -a year later.
>
Because we had a problem with a disappearing maintainer. We're working on
getting that straight now. These sorts of problems seem to be pretty well
absent in the current Debian Unstable packages, so you might have a look at
their patches (those plus a few more are what I notionally have in mind for a
1.2.6).

Scott K

-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

SPF discuss RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.