nobody at xyzzy
Oct 31, 2006, 11:44 PM
Views: 6466
Permalink
|
Nils Ackermann wrote on spf.help:
> "v=spf1 mx/28 -all"
> "spf2.0/pra ?all"
> The second follows the recommendation on new.openspf.org:
> Unless you have researched and developed a PRA policy, you should
> publish an empty spf2.0/pra record.
Trying to check this I stumbled over some minor issues. With
Google's help I arrived at http://new.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID
That has a link to the old IETF MARID charter. A better link
is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARID
Another link is http://new.openspf.org/blobs/spf-community-position
That page might need an update if all patent issues are irrelevant
today (?). I missed the list of signatures, therefore I tried my
link http://www.OpenSPF.org/OpenSPF_community_position_v102.html
That ran into a timeout trying to connect old.openspf.org - is
old.openspf.org intentionally down ? If *yes* some redirections
need an update. And probably my "position" link needs an update,
I need a "position page" with a link to the signatures (it's no
problem if that list is closed after two years, but I guess it
still exists somewhere).
Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss[at]v2.listbox.com
|
Re: SPF & SenderID
