<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Discuss</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>07 Nov  2009 19:42:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>limit ip-range for &amp;quot;pass&amp;quot; elements</title>
<description>Hello, Sometimes I meet a badly configured SPF entries for domains, which contain &amp;quot;+all&amp;quot; elements. I&amp;#039;ve also met a domain with entry like this: ip4:</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 11:45:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35305</link>
</item><item>
<title>can someone answer me a question i cannot seem to find in the docs</title>
<description>o    = domain of &amp;lt;sender&amp;gt; d    = &amp;lt;domain&amp;gt; ?? when and how are these different? i am assuming that perhaps %{d}==domain of current spf record bu</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 16:08:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35298</link>
</item><item>
<title>Spear Phishing (was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH)</title>
<description>--On 19 October 2009 07:01:57 -0700 David MacQuigg &amp;lt;macquigg@ece.arizona.edu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;snip&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;The one thing that particularly concerns me at the mo</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 06:33:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35226</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mail sent from web application goes into hotmail’s INBOX, and from Outlook it goes to SPAM</title>
<description>First of all, I would like to thank those who have responded and note that I changed the title of the subject to reflect the latest situation. Pleas</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 09:48:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35198</link>
</item><item>
<title>Several domains, one webserver/mailserver, same IP Address</title>
<description>Dear sirs: 1) I have a webserver/mail server that runs on a single IP address. 2) The domain is compatibleweb.com (mail.compatibleweb.com) 3) I hav</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2009 20:26:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35186</link>
</item><item>
<title>Tracking userids --was: SPF, DKIM, and NIH</title>
<description>Ian Eiloart wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Without having some kind of worldwide individual identity system, it just &amp;gt;&amp;gt; can&amp;#039;t be done. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; No, we can. At the university</description>
<pubDate>17 Oct  2009 06:06:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35185</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF, DKIM, and NIH</title>
<description>I hinted at the following as an aside in my Forwarder Mitigation proposals, but no one really picked up on the idea. So I&amp;#039;m going to repeat it more d</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 19:54:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35104</link>
</item><item>
<title>small dought in gmail</title>
<description>sir my name ganesh kumar i wanna know about in gmail how to send a message to no.of person&amp;#039;s at a time (above 100000)to my use my mail id plz reply im</description>
<pubDate>23 Sep  2009 07:04:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35079</link>
</item><item>
<title>OT: elephant in a crystal shop</title>
<description>On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Scott Kitterman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;We know M$ moves with the grace of an elephant in a crystal shop, and  OT: Is this metaphor used beca</description>
<pubDate>21 Jul  2009 06:52:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34976</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPFv3 idea: recipient domain macro for exists</title>
<description>I had one idea on how a sender could cope with an unhandled forwarder problem or unwhitelisted backup MX in some receivers, without completely giving</description>
<pubDate>17 Jul  2009 04:26:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34941</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
