Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 22:39:00 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi all, When I have an SPF record like: a:reflexion.net Should it allow for domain names like: asp-0.reflexion.net ? If not, can wildcards be use 24 Apr 2008 06:52:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33671 Hi, is it simple to add a "semantical" check to the validator ? If yes checks to see if included domains have an SPF record would make sense, and a c 23 Apr 2008 00:01:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33661 Frank Ellermann wrote: > Also modified: <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Hints_for_ISPs> CIDR notation allows to collect a huge number of IPs within a re 14 Apr 2008 01:19:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33617 New article: SPF Internationalization <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/I18N> Also modified: <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Hints_for_ISPs> I've moved the " 13 Apr 2008 22:49:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33615 When we run spam checks for incoming mail , I would like to skip spam checks if mail is SPF passed and mail is from ( A well known bank , my travel ag 08 Apr 2008 05:04:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33580 For info, for those who haven't seen it yet (882 KB, 15 pages): http://www.maawg.org/about/publishedDocuments/MAAWG_Email_Authentication_Paper.pdf F 07 Apr 2008 17:59:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33578 On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > > You had me convinced that PermError was better than nomatch. > > LOL, for 06 Apr 2008 23:38:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33570 On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > PermError => add note that this is about a syntactically invalid > > <target-name> for DN 06 Apr 2008 19:39:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33567 Hi all, I am brand new to this list so please forgive me if this question has been asked before. All or our email servers run Exim 4.x as the MTA. I 06 Apr 2008 17:34:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33565 This seems sufficiently on-topic for this list: The 2008 Conference on Email and Anti-Spam submission deadline is approaching, and has been extended 02 Apr 2008 06:33:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33556 [Spoiler warning: Off topic] > Have you checked that RFC 760 is the oldest source > for the robustness principle in RFCs ? I just stumbled over an i 31 Mar 2008 12:43:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33534 Hi listmembers, Recently, I found a few ISPs publishing their SPF records as IN TXT "\"v=spf1 .... \"" instead of IN TXT "v=sp 31 Mar 2008 06:55:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33526 AFAIK, SPF specs still mandate to add a TXT or SPF record for each subdomain. IME, that is one of the most frequent omissions in SPF configurations. T 26 Mar 2008 19:34:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33507 On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel/1831> > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.s 26 Mar 2008 18:35:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33506 For those of you running Debian Stable (Etch) interested in doing SPF checking with Postfix, you can now get what you need from etch-bakcports. Inst 20 Mar 2008 13:16:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33456 Hello, I maybe remembering wrong, but I thought we changed the TERM to 2 years. Thanks, -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort U 18 Mar 2008 09:47:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33434 I apologize if this is out of scope for this list - I wasn't sure, so figured I'd give it a shot... :) Anyway, I'm looking for a utility that would 06 Mar 2008 07:09:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33401 Michael Deutschmann wrote: > SWK-SPF is unlikely to "hit IETF servers in the form of an > Internet Draft", since I'm allergic to RFC lawyering and > 04 Mar 2008 20:25:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33381 The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Simple Mail Transfer Protocol ' <draft-klensin 27 Feb 2008 18:24:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33342 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > [An MTA maintainer] *should* be interested in allowing user extensions > (via postfix policy daemons or milter api) to mod 27 Feb 2008 10:20:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33338 I think the oft repeated "SPF-breaks-forwarding" and "Use-SRS-when-frowarding" is the still top problems for SPF acceptance. The next big hurdle is w 26 Feb 2008 04:57:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33326 Hi, apart from one tricky issue our 4408-errata page is IMO in good shape. At the moment the RFC-editor folks still list it as "reported" instead of 25 Feb 2008 15:46:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33322 > Title : Internet Mail Architecture > Author(s) : D. Crocker > Filename : draft-crocker-email-arch-10.txt > Pages : 24 Feb 2008 20:37:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33321 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.6.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Logging redesign: - Change 24 Feb 2008 20:11:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33319 Thanks, to Scott Kitterman, I have used the OpenSUSE Build Service (OBS) to create downloads for CentOS_5, Debian_Etch, Fedora_8, Mandriva_2006, RHEL 19 Feb 2008 01:22:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33311