Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 15:23:21 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi there, On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Thomas Harold wrote: > What is the current thinking on rejecting at the SMTP transaction if you > encounter an SPF fa 21 Nov 2009 07:10:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35349 Hello, Sometimes I meet a badly configured SPF entries for domains, which contain "+all" elements. I've also met a domain with entry like this: ip4: 07 Nov 2009 11:45:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35305 o = domain of <sender> d = <domain> ?? when and how are these different? i am assuming that perhaps %{d}==domain of current spf record bu 02 Nov 2009 16:08:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35298 --On 19 October 2009 07:01:57 -0700 David MacQuigg <macquigg@ece.arizona.edu> wrote: ><<snip>> >The one thing that particularly concerns me at the mo 21 Oct 2009 06:33:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35226 First of all, I would like to thank those who have responded and note that I changed the title of the subject to reflect the latest situation. Pleas 19 Oct 2009 09:48:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35198 Dear sirs: 1) I have a webserver/mail server that runs on a single IP address. 2) The domain is compatibleweb.com (mail.compatibleweb.com) 3) I hav 17 Oct 2009 20:26:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35186 Ian Eiloart wrote: >> Without having some kind of worldwide individual identity system, it just >> can't be done. > > No, we can. At the university 17 Oct 2009 06:06:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35185 I hinted at the following as an aside in my Forwarder Mitigation proposals, but no one really picked up on the idea. So I'm going to repeat it more d 06 Oct 2009 19:54:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35104 sir my name ganesh kumar i wanna know about in gmail how to send a message to no.of person's at a time (above 100000)to my use my mail id plz reply im 23 Sep 2009 07:04:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35079 On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >We know M$ moves with the grace of an elephant in a crystal shop, and OT: Is this metaphor used beca 21 Jul 2009 06:52:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34976 I had one idea on how a sender could cope with an unhandled forwarder problem or unwhitelisted backup MX in some receivers, without completely giving 17 Jul 2009 04:26:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34941 I propose to create a wiki page for features people think they might want in SPFv3 - like the Feature list for the Fedora project. Each feature wou 16 Jul 2009 13:47:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34936 On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, alan wrote: > the helo is validated by testing the for an spf for > postmaster@smtp-out.example.com thats what SPF recommends al 14 Jul 2009 07:53:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34925 In my "best-guess" algorithm, a validated HELO (that resolves to the connect ip) is added to the collection of validated PTR records for the PTR mecha 10 Jul 2009 13:52:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34901 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 04 Jul 2009 23:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34851 I like SPF, however, I've always had a problem with the arrogant attitude some show towards the forwarding problem -- that receiverside implentors sho 03 Jul 2009 21:05:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34848 Hi, I write this note in case someone is going to write a new version of the standard: an equality relationship between SPF records is not currentl 03 Jul 2009 10:49:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34844 My email SMTP server is hosted externally. I have been advised by the openspf.org wizard that the MTA should have an SPF record. I have asked the s 29 Jun 2009 01:56:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34836 One of our clients is having trouble sending us e-mail, so I ran a DNS report. They have a weird SPF record that I've never seen before. ("v=spf1 incl 12 Jun 2009 06:17:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34800 Hi All, I hope you can help me. I have been contracted to maintain and develop a bulk email generation tool for one of my clients. Under their cur 11 May 2009 14:41:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34689 test ------------------------------------------- Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/me 10 May 2009 14:12:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34686 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 09 May 2009 23:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34685 Hello, I exploit this list to report a bug in libspf2, as I tried to report to both rt.anarres.org and spf-devel without success in the past weeks. 15 Mar 2009 17:43:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34607 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 07 Mar 2009 22:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34601 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 07 Feb 2009 22:00:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34567