Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 12:28:29 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi there, On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Thomas Harold wrote: > What is the current thinking on rejecting at the SMTP transaction if you > encounter an SPF fa 21 Nov 2009 07:10:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35349 Hello, Sometimes I meet a badly configured SPF entries for domains, which contain "+all" elements. I've also met a domain with entry like this: ip4: 07 Nov 2009 11:45:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35305 o = domain of <sender> d = <domain> ?? when and how are these different? i am assuming that perhaps %{d}==domain of current spf record bu 02 Nov 2009 16:08:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35298 --On 19 October 2009 07:01:57 -0700 David MacQuigg <macquigg@ece.arizona.edu> wrote: ><<snip>> >The one thing that particularly concerns me at the mo 21 Oct 2009 06:33:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35226 First of all, I would like to thank those who have responded and note that I changed the title of the subject to reflect the latest situation. Pleas 19 Oct 2009 09:48:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35198 Dear sirs: 1) I have a webserver/mail server that runs on a single IP address. 2) The domain is compatibleweb.com (mail.compatibleweb.com) 3) I hav 17 Oct 2009 20:26:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35186 Ian Eiloart wrote: >> Without having some kind of worldwide individual identity system, it just >> can't be done. > > No, we can. At the university 17 Oct 2009 06:06:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35185 I hinted at the following as an aside in my Forwarder Mitigation proposals, but no one really picked up on the idea. So I'm going to repeat it more d 06 Oct 2009 19:54:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35104 sir my name ganesh kumar i wanna know about in gmail how to send a message to no.of person's at a time (above 100000)to my use my mail id plz reply im 23 Sep 2009 07:04:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35079 On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >We know M$ moves with the grace of an elephant in a crystal shop, and OT: Is this metaphor used beca 21 Jul 2009 06:52:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34976 I had one idea on how a sender could cope with an unhandled forwarder problem or unwhitelisted backup MX in some receivers, without completely giving 17 Jul 2009 04:26:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34941 I propose to create a wiki page for features people think they might want in SPFv3 - like the Feature list for the Fedora project. Each feature wou 16 Jul 2009 13:47:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34936 On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, alan wrote: > the helo is validated by testing the for an spf for > postmaster@smtp-out.example.com thats what SPF recommends al 14 Jul 2009 07:53:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34925 In my "best-guess" algorithm, a validated HELO (that resolves to the connect ip) is added to the collection of validated PTR records for the PTR mecha 10 Jul 2009 13:52:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34901 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 04 Jul 2009 23:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34851 I like SPF, however, I've always had a problem with the arrogant attitude some show towards the forwarding problem -- that receiverside implentors sho 03 Jul 2009 21:05:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34848 Hi, I write this note in case someone is going to write a new version of the standard: an equality relationship between SPF records is not currentl 03 Jul 2009 10:49:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34844 My email SMTP server is hosted externally. I have been advised by the openspf.org wizard that the MTA should have an SPF record. I have asked the s 29 Jun 2009 01:56:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34836 One of our clients is having trouble sending us e-mail, so I ran a DNS report. They have a weird SPF record that I've never seen before. ("v=spf1 incl 12 Jun 2009 06:17:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34800 Hi All, I hope you can help me. I have been contracted to maintain and develop a bulk email generation tool for one of my clients. Under their cur 11 May 2009 14:41:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34689 test ------------------------------------------- Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/me 10 May 2009 14:12:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34686 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 09 May 2009 23:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34685 Hello, I exploit this list to report a bug in libspf2, as I tried to report to both rt.anarres.org and spf-devel without success in the past weeks. 15 Mar 2009 17:43:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34607 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 07 Mar 2009 22:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34601 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 07 Feb 2009 22:00:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34567 Although its intended use is DKIM, VBR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vouch_by_Reference allows SPF as a means to identify that a mail message origina 06 Feb 2009 10:02:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34566 stuart wrote: >On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, alan wrote: > >> >several have commented with all the v1 and v2 records in place and now a v3 on top >> >will add 22 Jan 2009 11:46:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34517 Hi all, I'd like to be comforted by usage statistics, but have no data. My understanding of SPF checks by scope is as follows: helo: could work alw 20 Jan 2009 02:38:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34499 Please stop sending these emails to me I have no idea what they are about. I get several of these a day from your group. ____________________________ 13 Jan 2009 12:33:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34478 > I would expect some resistance to this from the IETF. RFRC-5321 (see > below) seems to say that the name has to be specific to one client > machin 12 Jan 2009 09:24:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34474 It looks like we'll need a mechanism to establish an official SPF project position on this. I think we need to elect a new SPF Council. Scott K -- 11 Jan 2009 11:47:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34464 Where do we stand with SPF usage on HELO/EHLO? The establishment of "capitol" out there in the net in the form of the thousands of domains that publi 05 Jan 2009 13:45:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34414 It appears that the SPF test suite no longer relies on spf1-test.mailzone.com. Unless I am informed that this is not true, you should expect those TXT 11 Dec 2008 08:12:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34369 Eventually I did put some content in http://fixforwarding.org/. It is an SMTP fix loosely related to SPF, that was discussed on this list last Janua 10 Dec 2008 04:27:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34363 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 06 Dec 2008 22:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34353 On Tuesday 11 November 2008 11:57, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Paul Howarth wrote: > > >> "G.W. Haywood" <spfmilter@jubile 11 Nov 2008 11:58:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34331 Hi there, I noticed that spf_example.c can cause libspf2-1.2.8 to segfault, so I inserted the following line: SPF_ASSERT_NOTNULL(rcpt_to); a 10 Nov 2008 08:51:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34329 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 08 Nov 2008 22:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34328 Hi, In August, We IIJ have released ENMA - SPF, Sender ID milter - as an open source product. The following website is the press release: http:// 21 Oct 2008 17:54:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34308 At 04:11 PM 10/20/2008 -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: >On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, David MacQuigg wrote: > >> Long-term, we need a way to motivate senders 20 Oct 2008 13:38:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34297 On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:54:44 +0100 Shevek <spf@anarres.org> wrote: >On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 00:10 +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote: >> Scott Kitterman wrote: 15 Oct 2008 16:16:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34270 On Wednesday 15 October 2008 13:35, Jason Frisvold wrote: > On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > There is (at last) a new libspf2 15 Oct 2008 13:29:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34263 I have complained to registrars that seem otherwise valid but which sell domains to the same spammers day after day. In almost all cases, they don't c 15 Oct 2008 12:29:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34262 There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. All the patches that I had collected from people were looked at and the issues addressed either by that p 15 Oct 2008 09:59:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34257 At 10:39 AM 10/14/2008 -0700, Michael Deutschmann wrote: >On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, David MacQuigg wrote: >> I didn't see any response to my suggestion of 14 Oct 2008 13:35:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34241 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 11 Oct 2008 22:00:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34212 My SPF based reputation system is working really well. I just added a greylisting feature for domains with no reputation, and spam dropped so much t 10 Oct 2008 10:44:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34205 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, http://www.openspf.org is back in business! The server has been fixed and Stuart D. Gathman 25 Sep 2008 15:20:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34199 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, www.openspf.org is still down and not responding. Does anyone have access to the machine? We 16 Sep 2008 06:11:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34193 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 13 Sep 2008 22:00:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34192 I can not access www.openspf.org. It started late yesterday. -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 840 12 Sep 2008 09:58:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34190 [Trimmed fwd from the devel list where it got no reply]: [...] > I think all of us are mostly on the same page now with > regard to the issue matter 07 Sep 2008 05:19:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34179 Hi, for info, Dave B moved his "dig" form to a new server, and added an SPF check page while at it, check it out: <http://tools.bevhost.com/spf/> F 07 Sep 2008 02:31:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34177 I am considering checking for spf2.0/mfrom records when there is no v=spf1 record. Does anyone have stats on whether any of these actually exist? 05 Sep 2008 12:29:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34176 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > with 2008.08 jSPF 0.9.6 fails the macromania test because %- and %_ are > inco 20 Aug 2008 12:01:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34154 Julian Mehnle wrote: > TLDs with dashes (e.g., ".xn--wgv71a") are now correctly matched. LOL, that spooked me when I *claimed* that my rxwhois clien 18 Aug 2008 07:17:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34112 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mail::SPF 2.006 has been released, bringing a few minor features and bug fixes: http://search.cpan. 18 Aug 2008 00:37:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34110 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A new release, 2008.08, of the RFC 4408 test-suite has been finalized: http://www.openspf.org/Test_S 17 Aug 2008 05:36:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34101 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > note that googling for `site:trusted-forwarders.org spf' yields > no results. That domain name has expired, so it is proba 01 Aug 2008 10:37:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34036 Hi, This is the header from an Mail-Daemon from today. This is after all my CNAME changes. Return-Path: <gerberb@mail.zenez.com> Received: (qmail 31 Jul 2008 15:26:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34020 Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote on the SPF DISCUSS list: > Yesterday, I received 10,000 Mail-Daemon responses for email, > I did not send. today I have only 31 Jul 2008 13:38:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34019 Hello, Today I received and email telling me I need SPF records. But with no information. I sent an email back requesting headers but nothing came 31 Jul 2008 09:01:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/34010 Scott Kitterman wrote: > perhaps you could give us a short summary on how this relates to SPF. In my review I needed SPF PASS twice and SPF FAIL onc 27 Jul 2008 10:09:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33993 For info, please review and comment on the IETF general list: > The IESG has received a request from the Sieve Mail Filtering Language > WG (sieve) 27 Jul 2008 07:45:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33991 On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:12:31 -0500 "Steve Yates" <steve@teamITS.com> wrote: >Scott Kitterman wrote on 7/23/2008 2:44:22 PM: > >> How to integrate SPF 23 Jul 2008 13:27:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33969 Hi, <http://spf-all.com/stats.html> is quite fascinating, it says that over 99.95% of about 2,500,000 evaluated SPF records use no macros at all. Of 23 Jul 2008 10:24:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33963 Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote on the help list: > there's one specific entity which takes our carefully > crafted SPF records and then {ab|re}uses them 20 Jul 2008 07:51:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33953 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 19 Jul 2008 22:00:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33951 Hi, a new draft should be soon available at the usual places including <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ellermann-spf-eai> With fresh ideas for obsc 14 Jul 2008 12:18:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33905 Hello I am new to SPF and i install exim with SPF supports. After the install i add the following line in the rcpt acl of my exim configuration fil 14 Jul 2008 11:59:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33906 > Hi, I'm mainly checking that SPF Help is really working again > via GMaNe after some months... > Gmail now rejects broken or missing DKIM signature 10 Jul 2008 09:04:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33904 Hi, for info, IIRC some folks here have strong preferences wrt example addresses in RFCs and elsewhere. On the SMTP list Tony asked: | John has said 07 Jul 2008 19:23:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33898 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.7.tar.gz Significant changes include: + Reject option for Mail From 23 Jun 2008 06:19:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33850 Posted on the rfc.interest list: >| Errata ID: 1081 (2007-11) was updated by Errata ID: 1353 (2008-03). >| The fix proposed in ID 1353 is clearly be 20 Jun 2008 01:34:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33841 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 31 May 2008 22:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33780 Hi Guys, I published SPF record for my domain, as given below. "v=spf1 a mx -all" And I tried sending mail from Kmail using a different mail server 25 May 2008 08:45:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33759 Hi all, When I have an SPF record like: a:reflexion.net Should it allow for domain names like: asp-0.reflexion.net ? If not, can wildcards be use 24 Apr 2008 06:52:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33671 Hi, is it simple to add a "semantical" check to the validator ? If yes checks to see if included domains have an SPF record would make sense, and a c 23 Apr 2008 00:01:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33661 Frank Ellermann wrote: > Also modified: <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Hints_for_ISPs> CIDR notation allows to collect a huge number of IPs within a re 14 Apr 2008 01:19:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33617 New article: SPF Internationalization <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/I18N> Also modified: <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Hints_for_ISPs> I've moved the " 13 Apr 2008 22:49:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33615 When we run spam checks for incoming mail , I would like to skip spam checks if mail is SPF passed and mail is from ( A well known bank , my travel ag 08 Apr 2008 05:04:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33580 For info, for those who haven't seen it yet (882 KB, 15 pages): http://www.maawg.org/about/publishedDocuments/MAAWG_Email_Authentication_Paper.pdf F 07 Apr 2008 17:59:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33578 On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > > You had me convinced that PermError was better than nomatch. > > LOL, for 06 Apr 2008 23:38:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33570 On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > PermError => add note that this is about a syntactically invalid > > <target-name> for DN 06 Apr 2008 19:39:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33567 Hi all, I am brand new to this list so please forgive me if this question has been asked before. All or our email servers run Exim 4.x as the MTA. I 06 Apr 2008 17:34:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33565 This seems sufficiently on-topic for this list: The 2008 Conference on Email and Anti-Spam submission deadline is approaching, and has been extended 02 Apr 2008 06:33:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33556 [Spoiler warning: Off topic] > Have you checked that RFC 760 is the oldest source > for the robustness principle in RFCs ? I just stumbled over an i 31 Mar 2008 12:43:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33534 Hi listmembers, Recently, I found a few ISPs publishing their SPF records as IN TXT "\"v=spf1 .... \"" instead of IN TXT "v=sp 31 Mar 2008 06:55:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33526 AFAIK, SPF specs still mandate to add a TXT or SPF record for each subdomain. IME, that is one of the most frequent omissions in SPF configurations. T 26 Mar 2008 19:34:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33507 On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel/1831> > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.s 26 Mar 2008 18:35:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33506 For those of you running Debian Stable (Etch) interested in doing SPF checking with Postfix, you can now get what you need from etch-bakcports. Inst 20 Mar 2008 13:16:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33456 Hello, I maybe remembering wrong, but I thought we changed the TERM to 2 years. Thanks, -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort U 18 Mar 2008 09:47:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33434 I apologize if this is out of scope for this list - I wasn't sure, so figured I'd give it a shot... :) Anyway, I'm looking for a utility that would 06 Mar 2008 07:09:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33401 Michael Deutschmann wrote: > SWK-SPF is unlikely to "hit IETF servers in the form of an > Internet Draft", since I'm allergic to RFC lawyering and > 04 Mar 2008 20:25:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33381 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > I never used any of those. Can anyone briefly mention the > > filtering 28 Feb 2008 12:59:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33828 The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Simple Mail Transfer Protocol ' <draft-klensin 27 Feb 2008 18:24:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33342 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > [An MTA maintainer] *should* be interested in allowing user extensions > (via postfix policy daemons or milter api) to mod 27 Feb 2008 10:20:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33338 I think the oft repeated "SPF-breaks-forwarding" and "Use-SRS-when-frowarding" is the still top problems for SPF acceptance. The next big hurdle is w 26 Feb 2008 04:57:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33326 Hi, apart from one tricky issue our 4408-errata page is IMO in good shape. At the moment the RFC-editor folks still list it as "reported" instead of 25 Feb 2008 15:46:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33322 > Title : Internet Mail Architecture > Author(s) : D. Crocker > Filename : draft-crocker-email-arch-10.txt > Pages : 24 Feb 2008 20:37:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33321