Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 18:31:42 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi all, When I have an SPF record like: a:reflexion.net Should it allow for domain names like: asp-0.reflexion.net ? If not, can wildcards be use 24 Apr 2008 06:52:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33671 Hi, is it simple to add a "semantical" check to the validator ? If yes checks to see if included domains have an SPF record would make sense, and a c 23 Apr 2008 00:01:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33661 Frank Ellermann wrote: > Also modified: <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Hints_for_ISPs> CIDR notation allows to collect a huge number of IPs within a re 14 Apr 2008 01:19:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33617 New article: SPF Internationalization <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/I18N> Also modified: <http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Hints_for_ISPs> I've moved the " 13 Apr 2008 22:49:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33615 When we run spam checks for incoming mail , I would like to skip spam checks if mail is SPF passed and mail is from ( A well known bank , my travel ag 08 Apr 2008 05:04:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33580 For info, for those who haven't seen it yet (882 KB, 15 pages): http://www.maawg.org/about/publishedDocuments/MAAWG_Email_Authentication_Paper.pdf F 07 Apr 2008 17:59:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33578 On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > > You had me convinced that PermError was better than nomatch. > > LOL, for 06 Apr 2008 23:38:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33570 On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > PermError => add note that this is about a syntactically invalid > > <target-name> for DN 06 Apr 2008 19:39:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33567 Hi all, I am brand new to this list so please forgive me if this question has been asked before. All or our email servers run Exim 4.x as the MTA. I 06 Apr 2008 17:34:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33565 This seems sufficiently on-topic for this list: The 2008 Conference on Email and Anti-Spam submission deadline is approaching, and has been extended 02 Apr 2008 06:33:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33556 [Spoiler warning: Off topic] > Have you checked that RFC 760 is the oldest source > for the robustness principle in RFCs ? I just stumbled over an i 31 Mar 2008 12:43:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33534 Hi listmembers, Recently, I found a few ISPs publishing their SPF records as IN TXT "\"v=spf1 .... \"" instead of IN TXT "v=sp 31 Mar 2008 06:55:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33526 AFAIK, SPF specs still mandate to add a TXT or SPF record for each subdomain. IME, that is one of the most frequent omissions in SPF configurations. T 26 Mar 2008 19:34:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33507 On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel/1831> > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.s 26 Mar 2008 18:35:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33506 For those of you running Debian Stable (Etch) interested in doing SPF checking with Postfix, you can now get what you need from etch-bakcports. Inst 20 Mar 2008 13:16:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33456 Hello, I maybe remembering wrong, but I thought we changed the TERM to 2 years. Thanks, -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort U 18 Mar 2008 09:47:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33434 I apologize if this is out of scope for this list - I wasn't sure, so figured I'd give it a shot... :) Anyway, I'm looking for a utility that would 06 Mar 2008 07:09:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33401 Michael Deutschmann wrote: > SWK-SPF is unlikely to "hit IETF servers in the form of an > Internet Draft", since I'm allergic to RFC lawyering and > 04 Mar 2008 20:25:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33381 The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Simple Mail Transfer Protocol ' <draft-klensin 27 Feb 2008 18:24:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33342 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > [An MTA maintainer] *should* be interested in allowing user extensions > (via postfix policy daemons or milter api) to mod 27 Feb 2008 10:20:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33338 I think the oft repeated "SPF-breaks-forwarding" and "Use-SRS-when-frowarding" is the still top problems for SPF acceptance. The next big hurdle is w 26 Feb 2008 04:57:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33326 Hi, apart from one tricky issue our 4408-errata page is IMO in good shape. At the moment the RFC-editor folks still list it as "reported" instead of 25 Feb 2008 15:46:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33322 > Title : Internet Mail Architecture > Author(s) : D. Crocker > Filename : draft-crocker-email-arch-10.txt > Pages : 24 Feb 2008 20:37:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33321 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.6.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Logging redesign: - Change 24 Feb 2008 20:11:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33319 Thanks, to Scott Kitterman, I have used the OpenSUSE Build Service (OBS) to create downloads for CentOS_5, Debian_Etch, Fedora_8, Mandriva_2006, RHEL 19 Feb 2008 01:22:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33311 I think I've now grasped forwarding-as-a-delivery, i.e. MRN side. But what about the originating network? Consider this scenario: I run an ESP servi 18 Feb 2008 23:39:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33310 Apparently ietf.org joined the spf-all.com club. I hope they intend to stay... :-) Frank ------------------------------------------- Sender Policy 14 Feb 2008 10:13:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33308 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > IMHO, the confusion stems from the IETF having apparently lost its > ability to specify standards. One may wonder why rfc2 11 Feb 2008 06:15:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33297 Since the discussion of solutions and implementation details seems to be full-speed forward, I would like to wrap up the earlier steps. Here is what 06 Feb 2008 16:56:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33279 I have just started learning about SPF, and have a few questions about it 1. Is there a SPF server where a domain must register its mail server and e 02 Feb 2008 09:41:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33257 When Microsoft acquires yahoo , I dont think they would pursue DK/DKIM So that means SPF or Sender ID will have less competition Hope now all yahoo 01 Feb 2008 22:25:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33251 This is the latest description of the tentative solution I assembled in my mind after browsing old posts about TENBOX and more recent discussions. R 31 Jan 2008 07:57:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33232 On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:09:44PM -0500, Dotzero wrote: > Does anyone on the list know of other major website domains or brands > that are using -all 30 Jan 2008 09:45:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33218 Ag Interactive/American Greetings is publishing an SPF record that ends in -all for the following domains: americangreetings.com msn.americangreeting 30 Jan 2008 09:09:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33219 Scott Kitterman wrote (six weeks ago on the SPF Council list): >> I did this kind of arithmetic before moving a "4 out of 5" >> erratum to confirmed. 30 Jan 2008 08:41:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33217 I've gotten around to creating an xml2rfc version of my "TENBOX/E" proposal. Although the word TENBOX appears nowhere in it, since it has diffused a 30 Jan 2008 06:58:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33216 To: Sky.com customers, Subject: For your information To: providers and their technical staff Subject: How NOT to do things If you happen to know an 30 Jan 2008 03:48:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33214 On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:01:11PM +0000, Rob MacGregor wrote: > > I'm glad there were a couple of responses. Let's hope support can > > continue. > 29 Jan 2008 05:47:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33199 Using our new terminology, we should be able to come up with a clear and concise statement of exactly what problem(s) we are trying to solve. Our Sim 24 Jan 2008 16:05:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33189 ... before we begin a discussion of how to solve the FORWARDING PROBLEM(S). Luckily, we don't need IETF approval, just the folks on this list. Remin 23 Jan 2008 12:20:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33185 How about we use |---- Sender's Network -----| |-------- Recipient's Network ---------| / Sender(s) ==> 22 Jan 2008 12:16:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33181 David MacQuigg wrote: > At 12:11 PM 1/21/2008 -0500, Stuart wrote: [...] >> Open relays were banned over a decade ago. Oops, I thought that RFC 506 22 Jan 2008 06:08:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33176 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > BTW, there is no authority who dares officially endorsing a DNSBL, > AFAIK. Once I've asked for that at a local ISOC meeti 17 Jan 2008 21:15:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33164 David MacQuigg wrote: > I can't think of any example where the MSA and Transmitter > would be in separate ADMDs. I can, it's onee reason why I don' 17 Jan 2008 20:56:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33163 David MacQuigg wrote: > At 03:45 PM 1/14/2008 +0100, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > I think adding one forwarder is sufficiently general. > If we can h 15 Jan 2008 00:32:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33140 David MacQuigg wrote: > Starting a new thread, as there seems to be some serious > interest in this topic. I've created http://www.openspf.org/Commun 14 Jan 2008 06:45:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33133 Starting a new thread, as there seems to be some serious interest in this topic. Here is what we have so far for a Basic Mail Handling System. 13 Jan 2008 12:57:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33131 At 11:05 AM 1/10/2008 -0500, Stuart wrote: >> >> C: MAIL FROM:<bla@example.com> AUTH=forwarder.org > >You would want > >C: MAIL FROM:<bla@example.com 10 Jan 2008 10:18:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33116 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frank Ellermann wrote: > Mark wrote: > > As parameter to the MAIL command?? We're not talking the SMTP 09 Jan 2008 08:11:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33099 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Deutschmann wrote: > I'd like to put my TENBOX/E proposal back on the table, with a few > chang 08 Jan 2008 18:51:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33070 I'd like to put my TENBOX/E proposal back on the table, with a few changes. First, I'm changing the "marketing" to be more a whitelisting enhancement 07 Jan 2008 02:24:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33053 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, you probably already noticed it: The messages sent to spf-discuss by Mark are getting replay 06 Jan 2008 09:39:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33045 I want to remind everyone on the list that we are all pushing for the same thing - we want SPF to become a more widely used tool to reduce abuse of th 05 Jan 2008 10:39:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/33005 I've read some posts on this list about SOFTFAIL. I agree with most of them saying it is a debugging feature. As such, it leaves something to be desir 05 Jan 2008 02:31:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32980 The current paragraph reads 2.5.4. Fail A "Fail" result is an explicit statement that the client is not authorized to use the domain in the 05 Jan 2008 02:15:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32979 Hi, in RFC 4408 I read The community is invited to observe the success or failure of the two approaches during the two years following public 05 Jan 2008 01:57:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32978 Hi, If you are a possible technical contact for Sky Broadband, could you please send me a private mail? Thanks, Alex ------------------------------ 27 Dec 2007 08:31:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32927 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > Anyway, I think we can only be about 90% certain that [GMail] actually > reject 23 Dec 2007 10:41:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32920 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Frank Ellermann wrote: > > > I think [Google] reject FA 22 Dec 2007 18:42:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32914 Bill Adragna wrote: > But they will change their SPF record every day.... won't they? Maybe. For you as receiver an SPF PASS from an unknown strang 22 Dec 2007 12:51:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32907 At 01:04 AM 12/22/2007 +0000, you wrote: >WebMaster@commerco.net wrote: >> Getting back to the original point of the thread, why Google >> apparently 22 Dec 2007 02:21:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32897 Hi, If there's anyone out there who wants to take over the not so rewarding but oh so important task of giving a helping hand to new SPF adopters, pl 20 Dec 2007 19:14:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32852 Hi, Would anyone know why google would say the following? <quote class="wrong">Publishing an SPF record that lacks include:aspmx.googlemail.com or s 20 Dec 2007 18:53:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32851 Hi, please check the Authentication-Results draft, and please say if you'd like any "official support on behalf of the SPF project" (FWIW). ----- Ori 14 Dec 2007 11:41:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32818 Hi all Thought you might be interested in this from Cricket Liu's executive summary of "The 2007 DNS Survey, performed by The Measurement Factory and 12 Dec 2007 14:06:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32817 A few days ago I got curious about the number of domains that actually use -all at the end of their SPF recods. I gathered some sources of domain name 10 Dec 2007 00:30:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32780 Y'all are going to hate me. Section 4.3 clearly spells out what happens for a too long label in MAIL FROM. However, for domain-spec, we have the fo 09 Dec 2007 17:43:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32779 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > + e14.example.com: > + - SPF: v=spf1 a:example..com > > There was alread 06 Dec 2007 12:33:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32743 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > Philip Gladstone wrote: > > Can I get a test case added to the SPF test suite th 06 Dec 2007 08:50:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32731 Can I get a test case added to the SPF test suite that deals with the problematic situation in my SPF record. In particular I have the following piec 04 Dec 2007 20:20:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32725 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > As for real implementation behavior, Mail::SPF currently treats > > > "a:foo 03 Dec 2007 13:44:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32722 Hello, We have been running milter-greylist with libspf2 (1.2.5) on Solaris 9, it works fine. We have patched with the latest 9_Recommended patch cl 29 Nov 2007 02:43:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32700 I have used the SPF wizard a while ago, and have the TXT file in my DNS as: v=spf1 mx:mail.site.com.com ip4:71.36.27.200 -all And I thought it was w 25 Nov 2007 20:49:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32674 Hi, the Internet Draft specifying a new header field Authentication-Results is almost ready. Some of us likely regret that three years too late is r 22 Nov 2007 00:40:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32668 Test mail, don't panic. The hutzler-spamops draft is now BCP 134, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5068 Minger is an interesting proposal by Arvel Hath 14 Nov 2007 05:55:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32630 Does anyone have any stats on whether there are enough spf2.0/mfrom records out there to be worth checking for? I don't care about spf2.0/pra (not b 13 Nov 2007 17:02:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32629 Some of the Errata have a "Reported by" credit. It would be nice if we could add that to as many as possible. I reported the %v macro and SPF exam 13 Nov 2007 08:55:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32628 I'm new to the list so forgive me if this topic has already been discussed. I've searched this list's archive but found nothing, which is suspicious f 07 Nov 2007 12:08:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32619 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.2.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Corrected regression so a 27 Oct 2007 12:19:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32594 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.1.tar.gz Significant changes include: - Fixed a significant bug (p 18 Oct 2007 06:32:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32575 I'm trying to find a PHP SPF checker, either in PHP or (preferably) as a PHP extension wrapping libspf2. I've looked on the SPF implementations pa 17 Oct 2007 04:07:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32563 I've just "met" the 2nd Swiss provider rejecting emails purely based on SPF. The first one was back in july, and they switched it off fairly quickly. 10 Oct 2007 01:43:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32529 I've just "met" the 2nd Swiss provider rejecting emails purely based on SPF. The first one was back in july, and they switched it off fairly quickly. 10 Oct 2007 01:39:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32528 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.tar.gz Significant changes include: - Domain and IP SPF whitelistin 03 Oct 2007 11:32:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32504 I have an idea for an adjunct protocol to SPF, which I'll call "Closed Loop SPF". Like SPF, CLSPF attempts to answer the question of "is it valid for 26 Sep 2007 15:17:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32488 Recently I had a bit of trouble receiving messages from this list. One of my favorite spam defences in an anti-Bcc: filter -- my mailserver is progra 25 Sep 2007 03:42:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32477 In a future SPF version, I'd like to see the "Received-SPF:" header extended to have an extra "exempt" status. Adding a "Received-SPF: exempt" header 23 Sep 2007 12:32:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32471 http://www.linkedin.com/in/npuhlmann Anyone know who this is? The name is unfamiliar. Similarly, there was a speaker at Defcon called |)ruid who als 21 Sep 2007 16:19:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32462 Seen after Debian package upgrade perl-modules 5.8.8-7 -> 5.8.8-8: Sep 17 08:25:26 HHH postfix/spawn[27585]: warning: command /usr/bin/perl exit st 17 Sep 2007 08:53:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32439 The spammers are registering mail domains and setting +all SPF records. Then the bots can push the spam through. oh noes. why was +all allowed t 05 Sep 2007 20:56:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32367 I subscribed to these lists. The welcome to message that was sent to me has SPF Error in the test. most strange. --troy it's header: Received: fro 05 Sep 2007 20:49:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32366 The new release is here: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.4.1.tar.gz It corrects a signficant error in result caching that caused multi- 13 Aug 2007 11:02:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32292 I am on vacation and will be returning on Auguest 13th ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 08 Aug 2007 13:40:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32281 i'm setting up to use Mail::SPF's spfd on with an exim acl on an osx box. easy enough to launch the daemon on debian etc, per example: /usr/ 29 Jul 2007 20:46:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32244 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear subscribers to the SPF mailing lists, as the list moderators have been plagued for years now by a 27 Jul 2007 15:36:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32237 Hello, I thought this may be of interest to members of the SPF discuss lists. http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/secu/article.php/3691196 Spam: Yo 27 Jul 2007 11:50:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32233 Daniel Bright writes: I am a field IT tech, I setup Exchange Servers, MDaemon mail servers and just about anything relating to mail servers in the fi 18 Jul 2007 09:19:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32198 The SRS page talks just about sendmail http://old.openspf.org/srs.html I use postfix + cyrus How Can I implement SRS Thanks Ram ----------- 18 Jul 2007 03:42:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32196 I have been unable to connect to irc.pobox.com for the last few weeks. Where does SPF chat reside these days? I am able to connect to other IRC se 14 Jul 2007 08:14:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32180 Cross-posted to the SPF and Karmasphere lists ... On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Meng Weng Wong wrote: > > Those of you who have been following the au 12 Jul 2007 18:53:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/32160