Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 25 Nov 2009 14:03:24 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg At 15:58 25/11/2009 Wednesday, Ian Eiloart wrote: >--On 21 November 2009 15:10:04 +0000 "G.W. Haywood" <spf@jubileegroup.co.uk> wrote: > >>Hi there 25 Nov 2009 09:35:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35363 --On 21 November 2009 15:10:04 +0000 "G.W. Haywood" <spf@jubileegroup.co.uk> wrote: > Hi there, > > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Thomas Harold wrote: > >> W 25 Nov 2009 07:58:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35362 Hi there, On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Thomas Harold wrote: > What is the current thinking on rejecting at the SMTP transaction if you > encounter an SPF fa 21 Nov 2009 07:10:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35349 iMail News Gateway Server v3.1 (c) Copyright 1996-2005 Santronics Software, Inc. Mai 07 Nov 2009 23:00:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35309 On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:25:17 +0100 Wojciech Scigala <libspf2.org@wojtus.net> wrote: >On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 02:55:30PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: 07 Nov 2009 12:33:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35308 On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 02:55:30PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think you should take note of such domains and mark all mail from them as > bad 07 Nov 2009 12:25:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35307 On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:45:25 +0100 Wojciech Scigala <libspf2.org@wojtus.net> wrote: >Hello, > >Sometimes I meet a badly configured SPF entries for dom 07 Nov 2009 11:55:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35306 Hello, Sometimes I meet a badly configured SPF entries for domains, which contain "+all" elements. I've also met a domain with entry like this: ip4: 07 Nov 2009 11:45:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35305 At 03:40 03/11/2009 Tuesday, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: >On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, alan wrote: > >> ?? when and how are these different? >> i am assuming tha 02 Nov 2009 20:35:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35301 On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, alan wrote: > ?? when and how are these different? > i am assuming that perhaps %{d}==domain of current spf record but I cannot > 02 Nov 2009 19:40:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/discuss/35299