hannah at schlund
Oct 21, 2008, 7:10 AM
Views: 1639
Permalink
|
|
include: result confusion?
|
|
Hello!
When re-evaluating test results from the new libspf2 release, I get
this:
I have an spf record that includes: another domain. Say
foo.example -> v=spf1 ... include:bar.example ...
And bar.example exists in the DNS (with other record types, such as A),
but has no TXT or SPF records.
I read the RFC in a way that that should result in PermError, from the
table in section 5.2 (recursive result of None should cause the include
mechanism to throw PermError).
A test for that passed before the update (with libspf2 1.2.5), however
fails now.
Am I correct in my interpretation? Should this get fixed again, so that
a None from the included record should result in a PermError overall?
Kind regards,
Hannah.
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
|
include: result confusion?
