
scott at kitterman
Aug 30, 2006, 8:21 PM
Post #3 of 4
(1577 views)
Permalink
|
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:00:25 -0400 (EDT) "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart [at] bmsi> wrote: >Should exceeding mx or ptr limit result in permerror, or simply >not match? The RFC just says you MUST not use more than 10. (10.1/7) >However, the preceding paragraph mandates PermError for other limits. >Also, there is no way to predict *which* 10 you will get first. >So the only consistent result is to PermError if there are more than 10. > >Comments? > >tests: > mx-limit-fail: > description: >- > there MUST be a limit of no more than 10 MX looked up and checked. > spec: 10.1/7 > helo: mail.example.com > host: 1.2.3.5 > mailfrom: foo [at] e4 > result: permerror > mx-limit-pass: > description: >- > there MUST be a limit of no more than 10 MX looked up and checked. > spec: 10.1/7 > helo: mail.example.com > host: 1.2.3.4 > mailfrom: foo [at] e4 > result: permerror >zonedata: > mail.example.com: > - A: 1.2.3.4 > e4.example.com: > - SPF: v=spf1 mx > - MX: [0, mail.example.com] > - MX: [1, mail.example.com] > - MX: [2, mail.example.com] > - MX: [3, mail.example.com] > - MX: [4, mail.example.com] > - MX: [5, mail.example.com] > - MX: [6, mail.example.com] > - MX: [7, mail.example.com] > - MX: [8, mail.example.com] > - MX: [9, mail.example.com] > - MX: [10, e4.example.com] > - A: 1.2.3.5 > IIRC, my validator takes the don't match/warn approach. Scott K ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel [at] v2
|