<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>24 Nov  2009 04:37:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Bind Zone Data</title>
<description>Is there a DNS server up somewhere that can provide answers according to the regression suite zone data? (Perhaps this isn&amp;#039;t feasible because of the w</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 15:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35297</link>
</item><item>
<title>pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>Hi, I raised the following bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker:   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pypolicyd-spf/+bug/455991 The problem is co</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 20:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35220</link>
</item><item>
<title>Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>Hello, I was looking at the python SPF stuff. I noticed I get a warning similar to this one below but for the python SPF module. /usr/lib64/python</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 18:00:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35100</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 IPv6 patch</title>
<description>Hello, I just saw that one is supposed to use this list for contacting the libspf2 developer(s). I already sent this to Shevek a few days ago, so s</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 21:21:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35098</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 1.2.9 - windows build</title>
<description>Hello all, Downloaded the 1.2.9 source and am trying to build it for windows using Visual Studio 2008. In the existing .vcproj files, there are refe</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2009 15:01:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35047</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem compiling spfmilter</title>
<description>Hi.      I have the same problem, but in a Slakware v11 distribution, any solution?      Thanks.   From: Michael Breuer &amp;lt;mbreuer@</description>
<pubDate>04 Aug  2009 04:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34991</link>
</item><item>
<title>rash of crashes: likely patch included</title>
<description>For about half an hour this morning, policyd-spf was halting with  error 1 on many spf checks. One such crash was reported in mail.log  as follows:</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 12:24:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34676</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF vulnerability</title>
<description> Hi,    We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam  functionality on windows platform. Now, we want to upgrade to the  latest version</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2009 01:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34634</link>
</item><item>
<title>netinet/in.h missing in spf2/spf.h</title>
<description>spf2/spf.h does not #include &amp;lt;netinet/in.h&amp;gt;, but several headers it includes refer struct in_addr. This causes compilation errors when SPF is used by</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2009 11:22:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34568</link>
</item><item>
<title>New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9</title>
<description>Hi there, Memory usage graph for spfmilter using libspf2-1.2.9: http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/spfmilter_memory_consumption_one_month.gif T</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2008 13:45:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34372</link>
</item><item>
<title>RT -- impossible to report bugs</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve tried to report some bugs today, using libspf2@rt.antarres.org. Result:  A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2008 04:00:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?</title>
<description>Hi, According to tests done by some people in the milter-greylist community, libspf2 (and possible libspf_alt) causes memory leaks on some OSes. See</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 09:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34312</link>
</item><item>
<title>include: result confusion?</title>
<description>Hello! When re-evaluating test results from the new libspf2 release, I get this: I have an spf record that includes: another domain. Say  foo.examp</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2008 07:10:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34304</link>
</item><item>
<title>New libspf2 release</title>
<description>There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. All the patches that I had collected from people were looked at and the issues addressed either by that p</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2008 09:59:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34255</link>
</item><item>
<title>InterPC.SPF + test suite</title>
<description>Hi, after we have sorted out how test suite test results *could* be published I added InterPC.SPF 1.1 with a link to Eddy&amp;#039;s article here (the test out</description>
<pubDate>21 Aug  2008 01:52:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34157</link>
</item><item>
<title>jSPF 0.9.6 passing RFC 4408 test suite 2007.05; no more &amp;quot;reference implementations&amp;quot;!</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: &amp;gt; with 2008.08 jSPF 0.9.6 fails the macromania test because %- and %_ are &amp;gt; inco</description>
<pubDate>20 Aug  2008 12:01:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34153</link>
</item><item>
<title>Live-DNS testing infrastructure (was: Implementation certification procedure)</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: &amp;gt; Julian Mehnle ha scritto: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Can we instead agree instead on having a public</description>
<pubDate>20 Aug  2008 04:49:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34135</link>
</item><item>
<title>Implementation certification procedure</title>
<description>On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: &amp;gt; Having an external testsuite allow you to check bugs in the testsuites too. &amp;gt; Often people that wrote t</description>
<pubDate>19 Aug  2008 07:01:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34121</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mail::SPF 2.006</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mail::SPF 2.006 has been released, bringing a few minor features and bug fixes:   http://search.cpan.</description>
<pubDate>18 Aug  2008 00:37:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34109</link>
</item><item>
<title>Test file changes</title>
<description>So is the .tar.gz file the best one to use? I want to add this to the openSUSE BS. Thanks, -- Boyd Gerber &amp;lt;gerberb@zenez.com&amp;gt; ZENEZ  1042 East Fo</description>
<pubDate>17 Aug  2008 09:34:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34103</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC 4408 test-suite 2008.08 released</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A new release, 2008.08, of the RFC 4408 test-suite has been finalized:  http://www.openspf.org/Test_S</description>
<pubDate>17 Aug  2008 05:36:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34099</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem with scripts in python-postfix-policyd-spf</title>
<description>Hi, With the latest openSUSE 11.0 and newer they use rpmlint and require that all script have a shabang in them. That is #! /usr/bin/python pytho</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2008 09:30:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Radio+ART+Edu</title>
<description>Dear OM ,&amp;amp;nbsp; .Herewith inclosed, some interestingQSL&amp;#039;s and photos of the international station 4U1ITU and from the Belgian station&amp;amp;nbsp; ON4UB at</description>
<pubDate>15 Jul  2008 11:09:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33911</link>
</item><item>
<title>InterPC.SPF 1.2</title>
<description>Hi,   Here are last changes made in the library :   - Integrates Alphons van der Heijden .NET resolver to execute DNS queries. So windows api is n</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2008 04:08:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposed test cases (%_, %%. %-)</title>
<description>description: Macro mania comment: &amp;gt;-  DNS supports any octet. SPF directly supports printable ASCII  and space, indirectly any octet, but no dots wi</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2008 09:50:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33882</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
