<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 16:49:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>libspf2 now managed on github</title>
<description>It&amp;#039;s only a little bit overdue (haha, really, haha) but you can now submit patches to libspf2 as PRs on github. https://github.com/shevek/libspf2 I</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 01:03:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36275</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Patch] fix unset received-spf header and return codes</title>
<description>Hi! The attached patch fixes two things in libspf2 1.2.9 *) if spf results to NONE or anything else without SPF record  no received_header and com</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2011 08:46:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36143</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF dns lookup NO DATA</title>
<description>Hi, I think I might have found a bug in the libspf2 library, please correct me if I&amp;#039;m wrong. I wrote some code that uses SPF_dns_lookup to resolve an</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2011 02:39:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36132</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH 2/2] spfquery: Simplify handling of the &amp;quot;result&amp;quot; buffer.</title>
<description>From: Florian Forster &amp;lt;ff@octo.it&amp;gt; This patch changes the &amp;quot;result&amp;quot; buffer to a character array of a fixed size. Also, the result is now printed as</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2011 06:51:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36085</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH 1/2] spfquery: Fail with an appropriate error message when checking arguments.</title>
<description>From: Florian Forster &amp;lt;ff@octo.it&amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s very annoying to be shown the &amp;quot;usage&amp;quot; output and not know *why*. This patch prints an explanation to STDERR</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2011 06:51:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36084</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] libspf2/spf_request.c: Fix handling of email addresses in query_rcptto().</title>
<description>From: Florian Forster &amp;lt;ff@octo.it&amp;gt; The function SPF_request_query_rcptto() checks whether the &amp;quot;rcpt_to&amp;quot; string argument contains the &amp;quot;@&amp;quot; character. I</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2011 06:47:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Grammar Requires Backtracking</title>
<description>Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the grammar requires backtracking? Specifically, because a domain-spec can include forward slashes, and becau</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2010 12:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35628</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2: &amp;quot;ip6&amp;quot; mechanism not working ?</title>
<description>Hello, If I publish a SPF record like this: testspf.univ-paris1.fr descriptive text &amp;quot;v=spf1 ip6:2001:660:3305::71 ip4:193.55.96.71 -all&amp;quot; then execu</description>
<pubDate>18 Feb  2010 11:15:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35518</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf dns bug while debugging enabled</title>
<description>Hi, I kept getting failures while trying to run the command line utilities with debugging enabled. A little poking around revealed a bug in SPF_dns_r</description>
<pubDate>08 Jan  2010 09:25:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35419</link>
</item><item>
<title>Home location for postfix-policyd-spf-perl (Postfix SPF Policy Server) also moved</title>
<description>The project is now hosted on: https://launchpad.net/postfix-policyd-spf-perl/ In addition to the release tarballs and the code (now in bzr instead o</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2010 10:53:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35416</link>
</item><item>
<title>Home location for pypolicyd-spf (Postfix SPF Policy Server) moved</title>
<description>The project is now hosted on: https://launchpad.net/pypolicyd-spf/ In addition to the release tarballs and the code (now in bzr instead of svn) the</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2010 10:02:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35413</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bind Zone Data</title>
<description>Is there a DNS server up somewhere that can provide answers according to the regression suite zone data? (Perhaps this isn&amp;#039;t feasible because of the w</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 15:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35297</link>
</item><item>
<title>pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>Hi, I raised the following bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker:   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pypolicyd-spf/+bug/455991 The problem is co</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 20:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35220</link>
</item><item>
<title>Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>Hello, I was looking at the python SPF stuff. I noticed I get a warning similar to this one below but for the python SPF module. /usr/lib64/python</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 18:00:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35100</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 IPv6 patch</title>
<description>Hello, I just saw that one is supposed to use this list for contacting the libspf2 developer(s). I already sent this to Shevek a few days ago, so s</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 21:21:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35098</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 1.2.9 - windows build</title>
<description>Hello all, Downloaded the 1.2.9 source and am trying to build it for windows using Visual Studio 2008. In the existing .vcproj files, there are refe</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2009 15:01:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35047</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem compiling spfmilter</title>
<description>Hi.      I have the same problem, but in a Slakware v11 distribution, any solution?      Thanks.   From: Michael Breuer &amp;lt;mbreuer@</description>
<pubDate>04 Aug  2009 04:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34991</link>
</item><item>
<title>rash of crashes: likely patch included</title>
<description>For about half an hour this morning, policyd-spf was halting with  error 1 on many spf checks. One such crash was reported in mail.log  as follows:</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 12:24:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34676</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF vulnerability</title>
<description> Hi,    We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam  functionality on windows platform. Now, we want to upgrade to the  latest version</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2009 01:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34634</link>
</item><item>
<title>netinet/in.h missing in spf2/spf.h</title>
<description>spf2/spf.h does not #include &amp;lt;netinet/in.h&amp;gt;, but several headers it includes refer struct in_addr. This causes compilation errors when SPF is used by</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2009 11:22:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34568</link>
</item><item>
<title>New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9</title>
<description>Hi there, Memory usage graph for spfmilter using libspf2-1.2.9: http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/spfmilter_memory_consumption_one_month.gif T</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2008 13:45:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34372</link>
</item><item>
<title>RT -- impossible to report bugs</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve tried to report some bugs today, using libspf2@rt.antarres.org. Result:  A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2008 04:00:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?</title>
<description>Hi, According to tests done by some people in the milter-greylist community, libspf2 (and possible libspf_alt) causes memory leaks on some OSes. See</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2008 09:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34312</link>
</item><item>
<title>include: result confusion?</title>
<description>Hello! When re-evaluating test results from the new libspf2 release, I get this: I have an spf record that includes: another domain. Say  foo.examp</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2008 07:10:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34304</link>
</item><item>
<title>New libspf2 release</title>
<description>There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. All the patches that I had collected from people were looked at and the issues addressed either by that p</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2008 09:59:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34255</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

