<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2008 21:33:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>InterPC.SPF 1.2</title>
<description>Hi,   Here are last changes made in the library :   - Integrates Alphons van der Heijden .NET resolver to execute DNS queries. So windows api is n</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2008 04:08:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33894</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposed test cases (%_, %%. %-)</title>
<description>description: Macro mania comment: &amp;gt;-  DNS supports any octet. SPF directly supports printable ASCII  and space, indirectly any octet, but no dots wi</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2008 09:50:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33882</link>
</item><item>
<title>InterPC.SPF and Test Suite</title>
<description>After many changes made, many bugs corrected and many code lines added, the library finally pass all the Test Suite scenarios.   166 tests get the</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2008 02:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33880</link>
</item><item>
<title>about &amp;#039;invalid-domain-long-via-macro&amp;#039; test</title>
<description>I have a problem with the following test in the test suite :   invalid-domain-long-via-macro:   description: &amp;gt;-    target-name that is a vali</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2008 03:54:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33875</link>
</item><item>
<title>InterPC.SPF &amp;amp; Test Suite</title>
<description>Hi all,   InterPC.SPF is a .NET library that has just been added to the openspf.org implementations page. In order to submit it to the Yaml test su</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2008 00:22:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33872</link>
</item><item>
<title>pypolicyd-spf 0.7 released</title>
<description>The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.7.tar.gz Significant changes include:  + Reject option for Mail From</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2008 06:19:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33849</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 crash</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m seeing a number of segfaults. I believe the issue is that libreplace is calling __dn_skipname with identical pointers, but I can&amp;#039;t seem to narrow</description>
<pubDate>07 May  2008 08:44:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33729</link>
</item><item>
<title>Where&amp;#039;s that test suite? (was: Re: Re: Quoted pairs in the test suite)</title>
<description>Frank Ellermann wrote on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:52:09 +0200: &amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t see why MTAs should suddenly start to be smart. They &amp;gt; get an address with a &amp;lt;quo</description>
<pubDate>25 Apr  2008 08:47:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33687</link>
</item><item>
<title>Quoted pairs in the test suite</title>
<description>Hi, does the SPF test suite cover oddities like MAIL FROM:&amp;lt;&amp;quot;\b\a\c\k\s\l\a\s\h&amp;quot;@test.example&amp;quot;&amp;gt; ? In the SPF I18N entry of the FAQ I claim that implem</description>
<pubDate>14 Apr  2008 00:14:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33614</link>
</item><item>
<title>Questionable DSNs</title>
<description>On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Alessandro Vesely wrote: &amp;gt; Frank Ellermann wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Stuart D. Gathman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I was considering posting an auto-note to pos</description>
<pubDate>07 Apr  2008 09:00:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33575</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Last erratum last call</title>
<description>Stuart D. Gathman wrote: &amp;gt; You had me convinced that PermError was better than nomatch. LOL, for the old 3:2 &amp;quot;rough&amp;quot; consensus I could claim that it</description>
<pubDate>06 Apr  2008 22:33:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33568</link>
</item><item>
<title>Issues building on Fedora 8...</title>
<description>Ok, maybe I&amp;#039;m brain dead... just tried installing libspf2 1.2.5 and spfmilter 1.0.8 on a Fedora 8 machine. libspf2 builds and installs OK. When I tr</description>
<pubDate>06 Apr  2008 13:31:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33563</link>
</item><item>
<title>Last erratum last call (was: Upcoming new test-suite release)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; I think I can come up with a proposal for the three choices: &amp;gt; PermError =&amp;gt; add note that this is about a syntactically invalid &amp;gt;       &amp;lt;tar</description>
<pubDate>05 Apr  2008 15:51:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33561</link>
</item><item>
<title>Python SPF policy server for Postfix available at backports.org for Debian Etch (Stable)</title>
<description>For those of you running Debian Stable (Etch) interested in doing SPF checking with Postfix, you can now get what you need from etch-bakcports. Inst</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2008 13:16:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33454</link>
</item><item>
<title>Another Permerror heuristic</title>
<description>When Pyspf get a PermError, it still attempts to get a &amp;quot;best guess&amp;quot; result by heuristically examining the SPF record. I just realized another simple</description>
<pubDate>19 Mar  2008 11:32:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33445</link>
</item><item>
<title>pypolicyd-spf 0.6 released</title>
<description>The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.6.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Logging redesign:  - Change</description>
<pubDate>24 Feb  2008 20:11:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33318</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF debian package configuration problem</title>
<description>Dear people, I&amp;#039;ve have a mail server composed by DebianEtch + Postfix 2.3.8-2 + Courier 4.1. I&amp;#039;ve installed SPF as a Debian package in order to check</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2008 08:46:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32975</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 root DNS change</title>
<description>Noted on slashdot:  Just before year&amp;#039;s end, ICANN/IANA sent out a short message saying that &amp;quot;on 4  February 2008, IANA will add AAAA records for th</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2008 07:00:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32971</link>
</item><item>
<title>Segmentation fault in libspf2-1.2.5</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for my english. I hope you will understand me: I&amp;#039;m trying to configure exim-4.69 with libsfp2-1.</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2007 07:01:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32924</link>
</item><item>
<title>bug reports</title>
<description>Hi, I want to send a bug report. I tried to open a ticket by mailing libspf2@rt.anarres.org, but I have received the following error:   libspf2@rt</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2007 03:10:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32922</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 memory corruption (?)</title>
<description>Hi, I am experiencing problems with libspf2. I have been trying various versions starting with libspf2 1.0.4, and so far every version I tried (up</description>
<pubDate>10 Dec  2007 08:50:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32789</link>
</item><item>
<title>Errata and &amp;lt;quoted-string&amp;gt;s (was: Upcoming new test-suite release)</title>
<description>Julian Mehnle wrote: &amp;gt; I think 2.5.7/1/3 (the third sentence, which I quoted in &amp;gt; the message you are referring below) is actually a mistake.  Okay,</description>
<pubDate>09 Dec  2007 06:36:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32773</link>
</item><item>
<title>Publishing test results (was: Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review!)</title>
<description>Stefano Bagnara wrote: &amp;gt; I just ran the testsuite r94 against jSPF and all tests pass. Great. I have an idea how to organize some kind of &amp;quot;SPF seal</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2007 10:15:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32751</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Upcoming new test-suite release</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: &amp;gt; + e14.example.com: &amp;gt; +  - SPF: v=spf1 a:example..com &amp;gt; &amp;gt; There was alread</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2007 12:33:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32738</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review! (was: SPF Implementation issues)</title>
<description>On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; + e5a.example.com: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; +  - SPF: v=spf1 a:museu</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2007 11:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32735</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
