<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>24 Nov  2009 11:04:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Bind Zone Data</title>
<description>William Ahern wrote: &amp;gt; Is there a DNS server up somewhere that can provide answers according to the &amp;gt; regression suite zone data? (Perhaps this isn&amp;#039;t</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 10:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35302</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>I released 0.7.2 with this fixed. It is also fixed in a patch in the most recend Ubuntu release. It&amp;#039;ll be uploaded to Debian shortly.  Thanks for</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 21:11:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35300</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bind Zone Data</title>
<description>Is there a DNS server up somewhere that can provide answers according to the regression suite zone data? (Perhaps this isn&amp;#039;t feasible because of the w</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 15:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35297</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:18:24 -0700 John Clements &amp;lt;clements@brinckerhoff.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; H</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 10:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35222</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I raised the following bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  https://bugs.launchpad</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 10:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35221</link>
</item><item>
<title>pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>Hi, I raised the following bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker:   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pypolicyd-spf/+bug/455991 The problem is co</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 20:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35220</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:18:54 -0400 (EDT) &amp;quot;Stuart D. Gathman&amp;quot; &amp;lt;stuart@bmsi.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Scott Kitterman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, 6 Oct 2</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 20:41:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35106</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Scott Kitterman wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:00:34 -0600 Boyd Lynn Gerber &amp;lt;gerberb@zenez.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;I was looking at the</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 20:18:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35103</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:00:34 -0600 Boyd Lynn Gerber &amp;lt;gerberb@zenez.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt;I was looking at the python SPF stuff. I noticed I get a wa</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 20:00:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35102</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:00:34 -0600 Boyd Lynn Gerber &amp;lt;gerberb@zenez.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt;I was looking at the python SPF stuff. I noticed I get a wa</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 18:22:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35101</link>
</item><item>
<title>Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>Hello, I was looking at the python SPF stuff. I noticed I get a warning similar to this one below but for the python SPF module. /usr/lib64/python</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 18:00:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35100</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 IPv6 patch</title>
<description>Hello, I just saw that one is supposed to use this list for contacting the libspf2 developer(s). I already sent this to Shevek a few days ago, so s</description>
<pubDate>26 Sep  2009 21:21:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35098</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2 1.2.9 - windows build</title>
<description>Hello all, Downloaded the 1.2.9 source and am trying to build it for windows using Visual Studio 2008. In the existing .vcproj files, there are refe</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2009 15:01:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35047</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem compiling spfmilter</title>
<description>Hi there, On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, DL - Joshue Martin wrote: &amp;gt; OK, I&amp;#039;m interested on it, can you send me the address for downloading it? http://www.jubi</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2009 01:51:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34994</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem compiling spfmilter</title>
<description>At 15:16 04/08/2009, you wrote: Hi there,  On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, DL - Joshue Martin wrote:  &amp;gt;     Hi. &amp;gt; &amp;gt;     I have the same problem, but</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2009 01:34:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34993</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem compiling spfmilter</title>
<description>Hi there, On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, DL - Joshue Martin wrote: &amp;gt;     Hi. &amp;gt; &amp;gt;     I have the same problem, but in a Slakware v11 distribution, any s</description>
<pubDate>04 Aug  2009 06:16:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34992</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem compiling spfmilter</title>
<description>Hi.      I have the same problem, but in a Slakware v11 distribution, any solution?      Thanks.   From: Michael Breuer &amp;lt;mbreuer@</description>
<pubDate>04 Aug  2009 04:43:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34991</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: jSPF 0.9.6 passing RFC 4408 test suite 2007.05; no more &amp;quot;reference implementations&amp;quot;!</title>
<description>We just released jSPF 0.9.7 passing both rfc4408-tests-2008.08.yml and current trunk&amp;#039;s rfc4408-tests.yml. Please update the Implementations page, whe</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 05:40:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34830</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, karan pott wrote: &amp;gt; I have made all the necessary changes to libspf2 (1.2.9) to port it to &amp;gt; Windows. It has been tested on Wind</description>
<pubDate>21 Apr  2009 11:11:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34679</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Hi Shevek, I have made all the necessary changes to libspf2 (1.2.9) to port it to Windows. It has been tested on Windows also. I like to submit my ch</description>
<pubDate>21 Apr  2009 03:44:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34678</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rash of crashes: likely patch included</title>
<description>Thanks. I&amp;#039;ll have a look. Lack of an &amp;quot;@&amp;quot; in an email address is not RFC complaint, but the policy server should not crash regardless. Scott K  ---</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 13:17:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34677</link>
</item><item>
<title>rash of crashes: likely patch included</title>
<description>For about half an hour this morning, policyd-spf was halting with  error 1 on many spf checks. One such crash was reported in mail.log  as follows:</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 12:24:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34676</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Thanks Shevek, Here is the modified file. the change is at line 350, Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks and Regards, Karan.  _____</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 20:48:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34674</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Thanks Shevek, Here is the modified file. the change is at line 350, Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks and Regards, Karan.   ____</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 20:46:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34673</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 14:12 +0530, karan pott wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam &amp;gt; functionality on wind</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 03:42:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34672</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
