<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 16:26:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: jSPF 0.9.6 passing RFC 4408 test suite 2007.05; no more &amp;quot;reference implementations&amp;quot;!</title>
<description>We just released jSPF 0.9.7 passing both rfc4408-tests-2008.08.yml and current trunk&amp;#039;s rfc4408-tests.yml. Please update the Implementations page, whe</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 05:40:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34830</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, karan pott wrote: &amp;gt; I have made all the necessary changes to libspf2 (1.2.9) to port it to &amp;gt; Windows. It has been tested on Wind</description>
<pubDate>21 Apr  2009 11:11:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34679</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Hi Shevek, I have made all the necessary changes to libspf2 (1.2.9) to port it to Windows. It has been tested on Windows also. I like to submit my ch</description>
<pubDate>21 Apr  2009 03:44:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34678</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rash of crashes: likely patch included</title>
<description>Thanks. I&amp;#039;ll have a look. Lack of an &amp;quot;@&amp;quot; in an email address is not RFC complaint, but the policy server should not crash regardless. Scott K  ---</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 13:17:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34677</link>
</item><item>
<title>rash of crashes: likely patch included</title>
<description>For about half an hour this morning, policyd-spf was halting with  error 1 on many spf checks. One such crash was reported in mail.log  as follows:</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 12:24:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34676</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Thanks Shevek, Here is the modified file. the change is at line 350, Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks and Regards, Karan.  _____</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 20:48:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34674</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Thanks Shevek, Here is the modified file. the change is at line 350, Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks and Regards, Karan.   ____</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 20:46:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34673</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 14:12 +0530, karan pott wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam &amp;gt; functionality on wind</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 03:42:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34672</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 12:04 +0530, karan pott wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Shevek, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have spent a bit of effort to make libspf2 1.2.9 to be compilable on &amp;gt; Window</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 03:40:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34671</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Hi Shevek, I have spent a bit of effort to make libspf2 1.2.9 to be compilable on Windows with Visual Studio 2005. However, while testing I figured o</description>
<pubDate>09 Apr  2009 23:34:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34662</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Hi, I must admit, I feel encouraged with the response I am receiving on this. Very special thanks to all :) Hi G.W. Haywood, Thanks for your inputs</description>
<pubDate>06 Apr  2009 04:17:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34661</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Hi there, On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, karan pott wrote: &amp;gt; Okay. I got it. Porting needs to be done for Windows. In case I like &amp;gt; to offer my effort for this</description>
<pubDate>04 Apr  2009 02:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34659</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>Thanks Scott, Okay. I got it. Porting needs to be done for Windows. In case I like to offer my effort for this, can you please let me know what proce</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 00:53:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34654</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SPF vulnerability</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:12:46 +0530 (IST) karan pott &amp;lt;open_mind_core@yahoo.co.in&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for an</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2009 05:14:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34635</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF vulnerability</title>
<description> Hi,    We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam  functionality on windows platform. Now, we want to upgrade to the  latest version</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2009 01:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34634</link>
</item><item>
<title>netinet/in.h missing in spf2/spf.h</title>
<description>spf2/spf.h does not #include &amp;lt;netinet/in.h&amp;gt;, but several headers it includes refer struct in_addr. This causes compilation errors when SPF is used by</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2009 11:22:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34568</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9</title>
<description>Hi Shevek, On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Shevek wrote: &amp;gt; On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 21:45 +0000, G.W. Haywood wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Memory usage graph for spfmilter usin</description>
<pubDate>16 Dec  2008 02:06:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34374</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9</title>
<description>On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 21:45 +0000, G.W. Haywood wrote: &amp;gt; Hi there, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Memory usage graph for spfmilter using libspf2-1.2.9: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http://www.jubileeg</description>
<pubDate>15 Dec  2008 08:54:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34373</link>
</item><item>
<title>New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9</title>
<description>Hi there, Memory usage graph for spfmilter using libspf2-1.2.9: http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/spfmilter_memory_consumption_one_month.gif T</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2008 13:45:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34372</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RT -- impossible to report bugs</title>
<description>Scott Kitterman &amp;lt;scott@kitterman.com&amp;gt; [01-12-2008 14:46]: &amp;gt; On Monday 01 December 2008 07:00, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve tried to report some b</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2008 07:45:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RT -- impossible to report bugs</title>
<description>On Monday 01 December 2008 07:00, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve tried to report some bugs today, using libspf2@rt.antarres.org. &amp;gt; Result</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2008 05:46:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34336</link>
</item><item>
<title>RT -- impossible to report bugs</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve tried to report some bugs today, using libspf2@rt.antarres.org. Result:  A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2008 04:00:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?</title>
<description>On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 02:39 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:52:15 +0100 &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hannah Schroeter &amp;lt;hannah@schlund.</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2008 08:31:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34327</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:52:15 +0100 &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hannah Schroeter &amp;lt;hannah@schlund.de&amp;gt; said: &amp;gt;@@ -615,7 +619,7 @@ SPF_dns_resolv_new(SPF_dns_server</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2008 10:39:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34324</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: include: result confusion?</title>
<description>Hi! Just to be public about this (I&amp;#039;ve already talked in private about this with Scott): My patch about the result code for included, but missing do</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2008 09:07:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34320</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
