<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 09:28:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>libspf2 now managed on github</title>
<description>It&amp;#039;s only a little bit overdue (haha, really, haha) but you can now submit patches to libspf2 as PRs on github. https://github.com/shevek/libspf2 I</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 01:03:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36275</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Patch] fix unset received-spf header and return codes</title>
<description>Hi again! Sorry. I attached the wrong patch. This is the right one now. Greetings, Wolfgang Wolfgang Breyha wrote, on 01.06.2011 17:46: &amp;gt; Hi! &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2011 08:52:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36144</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Patch] fix unset received-spf header and return codes</title>
<description>Hi! The attached patch fixes two things in libspf2 1.2.9 *) if spf results to NONE or anything else without SPF record  no received_header and com</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2011 08:46:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36143</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF dns lookup NO DATA</title>
<description>Hi, I think I might have found a bug in the libspf2 library, please correct me if I&amp;#039;m wrong. I wrote some code that uses SPF_dns_lookup to resolve an</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2011 02:39:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36132</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH 2/2] spfquery: Simplify handling of the &amp;quot;result&amp;quot; buffer.</title>
<description>From: Florian Forster &amp;lt;ff@octo.it&amp;gt; This patch changes the &amp;quot;result&amp;quot; buffer to a character array of a fixed size. Also, the result is now printed as</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2011 06:51:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36085</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH 1/2] spfquery: Fail with an appropriate error message when checking arguments.</title>
<description>From: Florian Forster &amp;lt;ff@octo.it&amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s very annoying to be shown the &amp;quot;usage&amp;quot; output and not know *why*. This patch prints an explanation to STDERR</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2011 06:51:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36084</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] libspf2/spf_request.c: Fix handling of email addresses in query_rcptto().</title>
<description>From: Florian Forster &amp;lt;ff@octo.it&amp;gt; The function SPF_request_query_rcptto() checks whether the &amp;quot;rcpt_to&amp;quot; string argument contains the &amp;quot;@&amp;quot; character. I</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2011 06:47:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: libspf2: &amp;quot;ip6&amp;quot; mechanism not working ?</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:13:07 +0100 &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Benoit Branciard &amp;lt;Benoit.Branciard@univ-paris1.fr&amp;gt; said: Benoit&amp;gt; below is a message I posted some</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2010 10:03:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35949</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: libspf2: &amp;quot;ip6&amp;quot; mechanism not working ?</title>
<description>Hi, below is a message I posted some months ago about &amp;quot;ip6:&amp;quot; SPF mechanism not being handled correctly by libspf2. Googling in the mailing list arc</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2010 09:13:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35948</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Grammar Requires Backtracking</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 William Ahern wrote: &amp;gt; Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the grammar requires &amp;gt; backtracking? S</description>
<pubDate>27 Apr  2010 03:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35636</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Grammar Requires Backtracking</title>
<description>On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, William Ahern wrote: &amp;gt; Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the grammar requires backtracking? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Perhaps it would have be</description>
<pubDate>18 Apr  2010 19:44:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35634</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Grammar Requires Backtracking</title>
<description>On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:26:35PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;I gratuitously wrote an RFC 1035 master file parser and composer in C (w/</description>
<pubDate>18 Apr  2010 11:01:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35633</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Grammar Requires Backtracking</title>
<description>On 17/Apr/10 21:50, William Ahern wrote: &amp;gt; Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the grammar requires backtracking? &amp;gt; Specifically, because a domai</description>
<pubDate>18 Apr  2010 07:26:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35631</link>
</item><item>
<title>Grammar Requires Backtracking</title>
<description>Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the grammar requires backtracking? Specifically, because a domain-spec can include forward slashes, and becau</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2010 12:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35628</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf2: &amp;quot;ip6&amp;quot; mechanism not working ?</title>
<description>Hello, If I publish a SPF record like this: testspf.univ-paris1.fr descriptive text &amp;quot;v=spf1 ip6:2001:660:3305::71 ip4:193.55.96.71 -all&amp;quot; then execu</description>
<pubDate>18 Feb  2010 11:15:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35518</link>
</item><item>
<title>libspf dns bug while debugging enabled</title>
<description>Hi, I kept getting failures while trying to run the command line utilities with debugging enabled. A little poking around revealed a bug in SPF_dns_r</description>
<pubDate>08 Jan  2010 09:25:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35419</link>
</item><item>
<title>Home location for postfix-policyd-spf-perl (Postfix SPF Policy Server) also moved</title>
<description>The project is now hosted on: https://launchpad.net/postfix-policyd-spf-perl/ In addition to the release tarballs and the code (now in bzr instead o</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2010 10:53:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35416</link>
</item><item>
<title>Home location for pypolicyd-spf (Postfix SPF Policy Server) moved</title>
<description>The project is now hosted on: https://launchpad.net/pypolicyd-spf/ In addition to the release tarballs and the code (now in bzr instead of svn) the</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2010 10:02:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35413</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bind Zone Data</title>
<description>William Ahern wrote: &amp;gt; Is there a DNS server up somewhere that can provide answers according to the &amp;gt; regression suite zone data? (Perhaps this isn&amp;#039;t</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 10:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35302</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>I released 0.7.2 with this fixed. It is also fixed in a patch in the most recend Ubuntu release. It&amp;#039;ll be uploaded to Debian shortly.  Thanks for</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 21:11:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35300</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bind Zone Data</title>
<description>Is there a DNS server up somewhere that can provide answers according to the regression suite zone data? (Perhaps this isn&amp;#039;t feasible because of the w</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 15:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35297</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:18:24 -0700 John Clements &amp;lt;clements@brinckerhoff.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; H</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 10:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35222</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:54 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I raised the following bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  https://bugs.launchpad</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 10:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35221</link>
</item><item>
<title>pypolicyd-spf crashing with IndexError exception</title>
<description>Hi, I raised the following bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker:   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pypolicyd-spf/+bug/455991 The problem is co</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 20:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35220</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Python 6 and md5 module is depracted use hashlib?</title>
<description>On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:18:54 -0400 (EDT) &amp;quot;Stuart D. Gathman&amp;quot; &amp;lt;stuart@bmsi.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Scott Kitterman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, 6 Oct 2</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 20:41:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35106</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

