Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 08 Nov 2009 02:16:11 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Is there a DNS server up somewhere that can provide answers according to the regression suite zone data? (Perhaps this isn't feasible because of the w 02 Nov 2009 15:07:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35297 Hi, I raised the following bug in the Ubuntu bug tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pypolicyd-spf/+bug/455991 The problem is co 19 Oct 2009 20:54:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35220 Hello, I was looking at the python SPF stuff. I noticed I get a warning similar to this one below but for the python SPF module. /usr/lib64/python 06 Oct 2009 18:00:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35100 Hello, I just saw that one is supposed to use this list for contacting the libspf2 developer(s). I already sent this to Shevek a few days ago, so s 26 Sep 2009 21:21:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35098 Hello all, Downloaded the 1.2.9 source and am trying to build it for windows using Visual Studio 2008. In the existing .vcproj files, there are refe 02 Sep 2009 15:01:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35047 Hi. I have the same problem, but in a Slakware v11 distribution, any solution? Thanks. From: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@ 04 Aug 2009 04:43:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34991 For about half an hour this morning, policyd-spf was halting with error 1 on many spf checks. One such crash was reported in mail.log as follows: 20 Apr 2009 12:24:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34676  Hi,    We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam  functionality on windows platform. Now, we want to upgrade to the  latest version 20 Mar 2009 01:42:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34634 spf2/spf.h does not #include <netinet/in.h>, but several headers it includes refer struct in_addr. This causes compilation errors when SPF is used by 08 Feb 2009 11:22:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34568 Hi there, Memory usage graph for spfmilter using libspf2-1.2.9: http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/spfmilter_memory_consumption_one_month.gif T 14 Dec 2008 13:45:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34372 Hello, I've tried to report some bugs today, using libspf2@rt.antarres.org. Result: A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more 01 Dec 2008 04:00:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34335 Hi, According to tests done by some people in the milter-greylist community, libspf2 (and possible libspf_alt) causes memory leaks on some OSes. See 24 Oct 2008 09:02:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34312 Hello! When re-evaluating test results from the new libspf2 release, I get this: I have an spf record that includes: another domain. Say foo.examp 21 Oct 2008 07:10:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34304 There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. All the patches that I had collected from people were looked at and the issues addressed either by that p 15 Oct 2008 09:59:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34255 Hi, after we have sorted out how test suite test results *could* be published I added InterPC.SPF 1.1 with a link to Eddy's article here (the test out 21 Aug 2008 01:52:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34157 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > with 2008.08 jSPF 0.9.6 fails the macromania test because %- and %_ are > inco 20 Aug 2008 12:01:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34153 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > > Can we instead agree instead on having a public 20 Aug 2008 04:49:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34135 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Having an external testsuite allow you to check bugs in the testsuites too. > Often people that wrote t 19 Aug 2008 07:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34121 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mail::SPF 2.006 has been released, bringing a few minor features and bug fixes: http://search.cpan. 18 Aug 2008 00:37:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34109 So is the .tar.gz file the best one to use? I want to add this to the openSUSE BS. Thanks, -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fo 17 Aug 2008 09:34:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34103 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A new release, 2008.08, of the RFC 4408 test-suite has been finalized: http://www.openspf.org/Test_S 17 Aug 2008 05:36:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34099 Hi, With the latest openSUSE 11.0 and newer they use rpmlint and require that all script have a shabang in them. That is #! /usr/bin/python pytho 15 Aug 2008 09:30:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34083 Dear OM ,  .Herewith inclosed, some interestingQSL's and photos of the international station 4U1ITU and from the Belgian station  ON4UB at 15 Jul 2008 11:09:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33911 Hi, Here are last changes made in the library : - Integrates Alphons van der Heijden .NET resolver to execute DNS queries. So windows api is n 01 Jul 2008 04:08:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33894 description: Macro mania comment: >- DNS supports any octet. SPF directly supports printable ASCII and space, indirectly any octet, but no dots wi 28 Jun 2008 09:50:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33882 After many changes made, many bugs corrected and many code lines added, the library finally pass all the Test Suite scenarios. 166 tests get the 27 Jun 2008 02:17:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33880 I have a problem with the following test in the test suite : invalid-domain-long-via-macro: description: >- target-name that is a vali 26 Jun 2008 03:54:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33875 Hi all, InterPC.SPF is a .NET library that has just been added to the openspf.org implementations page. In order to submit it to the Yaml test su 25 Jun 2008 00:22:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33872 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.7.tar.gz Significant changes include: + Reject option for Mail From 23 Jun 2008 06:19:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33849 I'm seeing a number of segfaults. I believe the issue is that libreplace is calling __dn_skipname with identical pointers, but I can't seem to narrow 07 May 2008 08:44:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33729 Frank Ellermann wrote on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:52:09 +0200: > I don't see why MTAs should suddenly start to be smart. They > get an address with a <quo 25 Apr 2008 08:47:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33687 Hi, does the SPF test suite cover oddities like MAIL FROM:<"\b\a\c\k\s\l\a\s\h"@test.example"> ? In the SPF I18N entry of the FAQ I claim that implem 14 Apr 2008 00:14:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33614 On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Frank Ellermann wrote: > > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > >> I was considering posting an auto-note to pos 07 Apr 2008 09:00:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33575 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > You had me convinced that PermError was better than nomatch. LOL, for the old 3:2 "rough" consensus I could claim that it 06 Apr 2008 22:33:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33568 Ok, maybe I'm brain dead... just tried installing libspf2 1.2.5 and spfmilter 1.0.8 on a Fedora 8 machine. libspf2 builds and installs OK. When I tr 06 Apr 2008 13:31:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33563 > I think I can come up with a proposal for the three choices: > PermError => add note that this is about a syntactically invalid > <tar 05 Apr 2008 15:51:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33561 For those of you running Debian Stable (Etch) interested in doing SPF checking with Postfix, you can now get what you need from etch-bakcports. Inst 20 Mar 2008 13:16:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33454 When Pyspf get a PermError, it still attempts to get a "best guess" result by heuristically examining the SPF record. I just realized another simple 19 Mar 2008 11:32:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33445 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.6.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Logging redesign: - Change 24 Feb 2008 20:11:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33318 Dear people, I've have a mail server composed by DebianEtch + Postfix 2.3.8-2 + Courier 4.1. I've installed SPF as a Debian package in order to check 04 Jan 2008 08:46:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32975 Noted on slashdot: Just before year's end, ICANN/IANA sent out a short message saying that "on 4 February 2008, IANA will add AAAA records for th 04 Jan 2008 07:00:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32971 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for my english. I hope you will understand me: I'm trying to configure exim-4.69 with libsfp2-1. 27 Dec 2007 07:01:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32924 Hi, I want to send a bug report. I tried to open a ticket by mailing libspf2@rt.anarres.org, but I have received the following error:   libspf2@rt 27 Dec 2007 03:10:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32922 Hi, I am experiencing problems with libspf2. I have been trying various versions starting with libspf2 1.0.4, and so far every version I tried (up 10 Dec 2007 08:50:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32789 Julian Mehnle wrote: > I think 2.5.7/1/3 (the third sentence, which I quoted in > the message you are referring below) is actually a mistake. Okay, 09 Dec 2007 06:36:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32773 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > I just ran the testsuite r94 against jSPF and all tests pass. Great. I have an idea how to organize some kind of "SPF seal 07 Dec 2007 10:15:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32751 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > + e14.example.com: > + - SPF: v=spf1 a:example..com > > There was alread 06 Dec 2007 12:33:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32738 On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > > + e5a.example.com: > > + - SPF: v=spf1 a:museu 06 Dec 2007 11:00:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32735 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > Philip Gladstone wrote: > > Can I get a test case added to the SPF test suite th 06 Dec 2007 08:50:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32729 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > As for real implementation behavior, Mail::SPF currently treats > > > "a:foo 03 Dec 2007 13:44:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32721 Hi, with 2821bis in Last Call I removed "<target-name> is a valid TLD" as potential erratum, if 2821bis permits it we'll follow suite. Syntacticall 02 Dec 2007 18:43:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32716 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.general To: <ietf@ietf.org>; "MAAWG technical" <technica 02 Dec 2007 16:42:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32714 Hi, the discussion about the empty exp= issue had no clear result. In the spirit of "running code", what do "real" SPF implementations when they stu 20 Nov 2007 03:27:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32658 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.2.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Corrected regression so a 27 Oct 2007 12:19:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32593 David Hinkle wrote: > Maybe fixing this will become trivial for someone with more experience > First invalid write: > > ==30539== Invalid write of 24 Oct 2007 07:39:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32590 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.1.tar.gz Significant changes include: - Fixed a significant bug (p 18 Oct 2007 06:32:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32574 There appears to be two spf_lib_version.h files. The one in the libspf2 directory is correct, while the one in include is not. It appears the one in 17 Oct 2007 04:59:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32564 What is the latest libspf2 release? Is it still being supported and/or developed? If not, what is my best alterative to work with Exim?? Thanks, 16 Oct 2007 09:18:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32559 We have been running Exim (4.67) with libspf2 (1.2.5) on Solaris 10 for some time now. We have two identical machines, Sun T2000's. Saturday, we p 14 Oct 2007 20:05:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32550 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.tar.gz Significant changes include: - Domain and IP SPF whitelistin 03 Oct 2007 11:32:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32502 I'd like to include the rfc4408-tests.yml and the pyspf-tests.yml files in our ASLv2 (Apache Software License v2) licensed SPF implementation (jSPF: h 17 Sep 2007 03:40:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32433 Ok, I did break my code out and my business problems are solved, but I'd like to help get the library fixed. I now have a little single threaded help 13 Sep 2007 13:39:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32420 I also see a lot of SoftFail spam coming in. example: HELO = host130-97-dynamic.11-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it MAILFROM = cservice.refAQ61195523.gps 13 Sep 2007 11:40:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32419 Since implementing milter-greylist here a few weeks ago, the few spams that have reached my Inbox here have been from domains (presumably owned by or 13 Sep 2007 06:48:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32411 Hello guys, First of all, thank you very much for producing the SPF libraries. I am the Sr. developer for CIPAFilter (cipafilter.com) which, among ot 11 Sep 2007 16:05:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32392 I've written a manual page for spfquery - please review it if you'd like. spfquery should be completely rewritten IMO. Among other things I don't lik 06 Sep 2007 09:38:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32377 Dear spf developers, while developing jSPF we wrote a "mock" dnsserver that is able to resolve a zone based on the content of openspf testsuite yml f 04 Sep 2007 03:35:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32365 The new release is here: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.4.1.tar.gz It corrects a signficant error in result caching that caused multi- 13 Aug 2007 11:02:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32291 2.0.4 is a minor bugfix release. It was released on Monday. I've gotten it uploaded to Debian Unstable. Scott K --------------------------------- 01 Aug 2007 12:21:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32269 hi, i'm building libspf2 v125 on osx 10.4.10. if i, cd libspf2-1.2.5 glibtoolize -f -c autoreconf -f -i ./configure --p 28 Jul 2007 17:33:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32239 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear subscribers to the SPF mailing lists, as the list moderators have been plagued for years now by a 27 Jul 2007 15:36:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32236 Hi, I am away on vaction the week of July 30th and will be back on the week of August 6th. For any emergencies please send an email to management@tw 27 Jul 2007 14:50:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32235 The Perl postfix policy server is now uploaded to Debian. Once Julian gets Mail::SPF into Debian, I'll update it to the current version. Scott K - 27 Jul 2007 14:46:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32234 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Saturday 14 July 2007 15:32, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Mail::SPF's approach 14 Jul 2007 17:18:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32188 On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:01, Robert Millan wrote: > To be honest, I have to say that I don't like the possibility of my code > becoming non-free. 14 Jul 2007 04:46:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32175 tag 430508 upstream tag 431239 upstream thanks Any comments or objections to these patches? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;att=1; 13 Jul 2007 13:20:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32165 I've updated the Python policy server to version 0.4. The most significant changes in this release are: 1. Implementation of a configuration file a 09 Jul 2007 20:53:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32144 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Sunday 17 June 2007 04:18, Julian Mehnle wrote: >>> Scott Kitterman wrote: >>>> [...] If som 18 Jun 2007 02:59:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32074 The ABNF for Received SPF shows the results with an initial capital letter: http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408#header-field result = "Pass" / 12 Jun 2007 10:09:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32002 Trying to make jSPF to pass the whole testsuite I had to change a behaviour of dnsjava (the dns library we use) to handle multiple identical dns recor 12 Jun 2007 09:17:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31999 Hi Luis and Michael, Would you be able to consider reworking NetAddr::IP to avoid the use of, or loading of anything that uses, $& or $` so that the 06 Jun 2007 09:46:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31983 Julian -- Any chance that you could avoid this? Daryl -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Bug 5312] Razor plugin uses forbidden $' operato 06 Jun 2007 08:47:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31980 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I officially documented the API of the openspf.org "Why?" page[1]: http://www.openspf.org/W 31 May 2007 18:36:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31972 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mail::SPF 2.005, a medium update, has been released: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF-v2.005/ De 30 May 2007 17:47:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31968 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A new release, 2007.05, of the RFC 4408 test-suite has been finalized: http://www.openspf.org/Test_S 30 May 2007 14:14:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31966 The Perl SPF lib doesn't handle broken DNS servers (that do something screwy with type 99 requests - i.e. anything other than NOTFOUND). For instance 22 May 2007 09:52:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31886 On Wednesday 02 May 2007 19:30, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Thanks Julian, that would be appreciated. We released SpamAssassin > 3.2.0 today which i 18 May 2007 04:54:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31874 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Travis, Scott Kitterman proposed that we set up a Subversion repository for libspf at openspf.org. 15 May 2007 15:14:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31873 On Thursday 10 May 2007 11:56, Koen Martens wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > On Thu, 10 May 2007, Koen Martens wrote: > >>> What do I need to do 10 May 2007 10:00:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31848 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > | $ dig TXT mehnle.net +short > | "About Sender Policy Framework (SPF): <http:// 03 May 2007 12:15:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31768 Julian? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: SPF upgrade errors for SpamAssassin 3.2.0 Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:54:52 -0600 From: J 02 May 2007 10:19:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31745 John A Martin: Do you see warnings like this? Scott K ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [spf-help] postfix-policyd-spf-perl a 18 Apr 2007 05:21:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31624 http://www.openspf.org/Software#postfix-policyd-spf-perl Version 2.003 adds a basic ability to whitelist from SPF checks by ip address (you will hav 17 Apr 2007 08:22:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31614 http://packages.debian.org/unstable/python/python-spf ------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- 17 Apr 2007 06:21:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31610 This is pyspf specific. In addition to making get_header() RFC4408 compliant :-}, I have provided for adding additional x-name=val pairs to the head 29 Mar 2007 12:52:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31461 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Magnus, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Given the overall quality of the libspf2 command-line utilities - lac 27 Mar 2007 07:23:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31431 All this time, I've been generating Received-SPF header fields, and I've been doing it wrong. I was just emulating what I've seen elsewhere, but jus 26 Mar 2007 19:15:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31427 Julian Mehnle wrote: > It's obviously unspecified (as unfortunate as it may be) The current state of the art wrt 2821bis is that it will adopt the 24 Mar 2007 18:53:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31369 There is a silly bug in unimplemented() that causes spfquery to enter an infinite loop if an unimplemented option is used. Nothing critical, but silly 24 Mar 2007 17:43:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31362 Judging from the source files the libspf2 developers use a tab with of 4. I'm not saying that it's wrong, but the universal standard is 8 and using 24 Mar 2007 17:38:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31361