Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Jul 2008 06:34:24 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Dear OM ,  .Herewith inclosed, some interestingQSL's and photos of the international station 4U1ITU and from the Belgian station  ON4UB at 15 Jul 2008 11:09:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33911 Hi, Here are last changes made in the library : - Integrates Alphons van der Heijden .NET resolver to execute DNS queries. So windows api is n 01 Jul 2008 04:08:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33894 description: Macro mania comment: >- DNS supports any octet. SPF directly supports printable ASCII and space, indirectly any octet, but no dots wi 28 Jun 2008 09:50:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33882 After many changes made, many bugs corrected and many code lines added, the library finally pass all the Test Suite scenarios. 166 tests get the 27 Jun 2008 02:17:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33880 I have a problem with the following test in the test suite : invalid-domain-long-via-macro: description: >- target-name that is a vali 26 Jun 2008 03:54:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33875 Hi all, InterPC.SPF is a .NET library that has just been added to the openspf.org implementations page. In order to submit it to the Yaml test su 25 Jun 2008 00:22:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33872 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.7.tar.gz Significant changes include: + Reject option for Mail From 23 Jun 2008 06:19:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33849 I'm seeing a number of segfaults. I believe the issue is that libreplace is calling __dn_skipname with identical pointers, but I can't seem to narrow 07 May 2008 08:44:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33729 Frank Ellermann wrote on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:52:09 +0200: > I don't see why MTAs should suddenly start to be smart. They > get an address with a <quo 25 Apr 2008 08:47:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33687 Hi, does the SPF test suite cover oddities like MAIL FROM:<"\b\a\c\k\s\l\a\s\h"@test.example"> ? In the SPF I18N entry of the FAQ I claim that implem 14 Apr 2008 00:14:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33614 On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Frank Ellermann wrote: > > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > >> I was considering posting an auto-note to pos 07 Apr 2008 09:00:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33575 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > You had me convinced that PermError was better than nomatch. LOL, for the old 3:2 "rough" consensus I could claim that it 06 Apr 2008 22:33:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33568 Ok, maybe I'm brain dead... just tried installing libspf2 1.2.5 and spfmilter 1.0.8 on a Fedora 8 machine. libspf2 builds and installs OK. When I tr 06 Apr 2008 13:31:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33563 > I think I can come up with a proposal for the three choices: > PermError => add note that this is about a syntactically invalid > <tar 05 Apr 2008 15:51:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33561 For those of you running Debian Stable (Etch) interested in doing SPF checking with Postfix, you can now get what you need from etch-bakcports. Inst 20 Mar 2008 13:16:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33454 When Pyspf get a PermError, it still attempts to get a "best guess" result by heuristically examining the SPF record. I just realized another simple 19 Mar 2008 11:32:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33445 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.6.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Logging redesign: - Change 24 Feb 2008 20:11:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/33318 Dear people, I've have a mail server composed by DebianEtch + Postfix 2.3.8-2 + Courier 4.1. I've installed SPF as a Debian package in order to check 04 Jan 2008 08:46:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32975 Noted on slashdot: Just before year's end, ICANN/IANA sent out a short message saying that "on 4 February 2008, IANA will add AAAA records for th 04 Jan 2008 07:00:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32971 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for my english. I hope you will understand me: I'm trying to configure exim-4.69 with libsfp2-1. 27 Dec 2007 07:01:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32924 Hi, I want to send a bug report. I tried to open a ticket by mailing libspf2@rt.anarres.org, but I have received the following error:   libspf2@rt 27 Dec 2007 03:10:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32922 Hi, I am experiencing problems with libspf2. I have been trying various versions starting with libspf2 1.0.4, and so far every version I tried (up 10 Dec 2007 08:50:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32789 Julian Mehnle wrote: > I think 2.5.7/1/3 (the third sentence, which I quoted in > the message you are referring below) is actually a mistake. Okay, 09 Dec 2007 06:36:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32773 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > I just ran the testsuite r94 against jSPF and all tests pass. Great. I have an idea how to organize some kind of "SPF seal 07 Dec 2007 10:15:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32751 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > + e14.example.com: > + - SPF: v=spf1 a:example..com > > There was alread 06 Dec 2007 12:33:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32738 On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > > + e5a.example.com: > > + - SPF: v=spf1 a:museu 06 Dec 2007 11:00:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32735 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > Philip Gladstone wrote: > > Can I get a test case added to the SPF test suite th 06 Dec 2007 08:50:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32729 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > As for real implementation behavior, Mail::SPF currently treats > > > "a:foo 03 Dec 2007 13:44:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32721 Hi, with 2821bis in Last Call I removed "<target-name> is a valid TLD" as potential erratum, if 2821bis permits it we'll follow suite. Syntacticall 02 Dec 2007 18:43:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32716 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.general To: <ietf@ietf.org>; "MAAWG technical" <technica 02 Dec 2007 16:42:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32714 Hi, the discussion about the empty exp= issue had no clear result. In the spirit of "running code", what do "real" SPF implementations when they stu 20 Nov 2007 03:27:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32658 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.2.tar.gz Significant changes include: * Corrected regression so a 27 Oct 2007 12:19:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32593 David Hinkle wrote: > Maybe fixing this will become trivial for someone with more experience > First invalid write: > > ==30539== Invalid write of 24 Oct 2007 07:39:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32590 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.1.tar.gz Significant changes include: - Fixed a significant bug (p 18 Oct 2007 06:32:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32574 There appears to be two spf_lib_version.h files. The one in the libspf2 directory is correct, while the one in include is not. It appears the one in 17 Oct 2007 04:59:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32564 What is the latest libspf2 release? Is it still being supported and/or developed? If not, what is my best alterative to work with Exim?? Thanks, 16 Oct 2007 09:18:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32559 We have been running Exim (4.67) with libspf2 (1.2.5) on Solaris 10 for some time now. We have two identical machines, Sun T2000's. Saturday, we p 14 Oct 2007 20:05:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32550 The new version can be found at: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.5.tar.gz Significant changes include: - Domain and IP SPF whitelistin 03 Oct 2007 11:32:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32502 I'd like to include the rfc4408-tests.yml and the pyspf-tests.yml files in our ASLv2 (Apache Software License v2) licensed SPF implementation (jSPF: h 17 Sep 2007 03:40:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32433 Ok, I did break my code out and my business problems are solved, but I'd like to help get the library fixed. I now have a little single threaded help 13 Sep 2007 13:39:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32420 I also see a lot of SoftFail spam coming in. example: HELO = host130-97-dynamic.11-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it MAILFROM = cservice.refAQ61195523.gps 13 Sep 2007 11:40:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32419 Since implementing milter-greylist here a few weeks ago, the few spams that have reached my Inbox here have been from domains (presumably owned by or 13 Sep 2007 06:48:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32411 Hello guys, First of all, thank you very much for producing the SPF libraries. I am the Sr. developer for CIPAFilter (cipafilter.com) which, among ot 11 Sep 2007 16:05:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32392 I've written a manual page for spfquery - please review it if you'd like. spfquery should be completely rewritten IMO. Among other things I don't lik 06 Sep 2007 09:38:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32377 Dear spf developers, while developing jSPF we wrote a "mock" dnsserver that is able to resolve a zone based on the content of openspf testsuite yml f 04 Sep 2007 03:35:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32365 The new release is here: http://www.openspf.org/blobs/pypolicyd-spf-0.4.1.tar.gz It corrects a signficant error in result caching that caused multi- 13 Aug 2007 11:02:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32291 2.0.4 is a minor bugfix release. It was released on Monday. I've gotten it uploaded to Debian Unstable. Scott K --------------------------------- 01 Aug 2007 12:21:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32269 hi, i'm building libspf2 v125 on osx 10.4.10. if i, cd libspf2-1.2.5 glibtoolize -f -c autoreconf -f -i ./configure --p 28 Jul 2007 17:33:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32239 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear subscribers to the SPF mailing lists, as the list moderators have been plagued for years now by a 27 Jul 2007 15:36:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32236 Hi, I am away on vaction the week of July 30th and will be back on the week of August 6th. For any emergencies please send an email to management@tw 27 Jul 2007 14:50:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32235 The Perl postfix policy server is now uploaded to Debian. Once Julian gets Mail::SPF into Debian, I'll update it to the current version. Scott K - 27 Jul 2007 14:46:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32234 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Saturday 14 July 2007 15:32, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Mail::SPF's approach 14 Jul 2007 17:18:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32188 On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:01, Robert Millan wrote: > To be honest, I have to say that I don't like the possibility of my code > becoming non-free. 14 Jul 2007 04:46:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32175 tag 430508 upstream tag 431239 upstream thanks Any comments or objections to these patches? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;att=1; 13 Jul 2007 13:20:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32165 I've updated the Python policy server to version 0.4. The most significant changes in this release are: 1. Implementation of a configuration file a 09 Jul 2007 20:53:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32144 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Sunday 17 June 2007 04:18, Julian Mehnle wrote: >>> Scott Kitterman wrote: >>>> [...] If som 18 Jun 2007 02:59:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32074 The ABNF for Received SPF shows the results with an initial capital letter: http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408#header-field result = "Pass" / 12 Jun 2007 10:09:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/32002 Trying to make jSPF to pass the whole testsuite I had to change a behaviour of dnsjava (the dns library we use) to handle multiple identical dns recor 12 Jun 2007 09:17:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31999 Hi Luis and Michael, Would you be able to consider reworking NetAddr::IP to avoid the use of, or loading of anything that uses, $& or $` so that the 06 Jun 2007 09:46:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31983 Julian -- Any chance that you could avoid this? Daryl -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Bug 5312] Razor plugin uses forbidden $' operato 06 Jun 2007 08:47:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31980 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I officially documented the API of the openspf.org "Why?" page[1]: http://www.openspf.org/W 31 May 2007 18:36:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31972 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mail::SPF 2.005, a medium update, has been released: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SPF-v2.005/ De 30 May 2007 17:47:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31968 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A new release, 2007.05, of the RFC 4408 test-suite has been finalized: http://www.openspf.org/Test_S 30 May 2007 14:14:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31966 The Perl SPF lib doesn't handle broken DNS servers (that do something screwy with type 99 requests - i.e. anything other than NOTFOUND). For instance 22 May 2007 09:52:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31886 On Wednesday 02 May 2007 19:30, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Thanks Julian, that would be appreciated. We released SpamAssassin > 3.2.0 today which i 18 May 2007 04:54:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31874 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Travis, Scott Kitterman proposed that we set up a Subversion repository for libspf at openspf.org. 15 May 2007 15:14:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31873 On Thursday 10 May 2007 11:56, Koen Martens wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > On Thu, 10 May 2007, Koen Martens wrote: > >>> What do I need to do 10 May 2007 10:00:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31848 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote: > | $ dig TXT mehnle.net +short > | "About Sender Policy Framework (SPF): <http:// 03 May 2007 12:15:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31768 Julian? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: SPF upgrade errors for SpamAssassin 3.2.0 Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:54:52 -0600 From: J 02 May 2007 10:19:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31745 John A Martin: Do you see warnings like this? Scott K ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [spf-help] postfix-policyd-spf-perl a 18 Apr 2007 05:21:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31624 http://www.openspf.org/Software#postfix-policyd-spf-perl Version 2.003 adds a basic ability to whitelist from SPF checks by ip address (you will hav 17 Apr 2007 08:22:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31614 http://packages.debian.org/unstable/python/python-spf ------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- 17 Apr 2007 06:21:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31610 This is pyspf specific. In addition to making get_header() RFC4408 compliant :-}, I have provided for adding additional x-name=val pairs to the head 29 Mar 2007 12:52:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31461 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Magnus, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Given the overall quality of the libspf2 command-line utilities - lac 27 Mar 2007 07:23:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31431 All this time, I've been generating Received-SPF header fields, and I've been doing it wrong. I was just emulating what I've seen elsewhere, but jus 26 Mar 2007 19:15:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31427 Julian Mehnle wrote: > It's obviously unspecified (as unfortunate as it may be) The current state of the art wrt 2821bis is that it will adopt the 24 Mar 2007 18:53:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31369 There is a silly bug in unimplemented() that causes spfquery to enter an infinite loop if an unimplemented option is used. Nothing critical, but silly 24 Mar 2007 17:43:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31362 Judging from the source files the libspf2 developers use a tab with of 4. I'm not saying that it's wrong, but the universal standard is 8 and using 24 Mar 2007 17:38:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31361 I thought I should attach the patch I'm about to apply to libspf2 in Debian. I started with the patch posted by Thomas Jacob to the Debian bug report 24 Mar 2007 02:38:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31358 retitle 372629 ITA: libspf2 -- Sender Policy Framework library, written in C owner 372629 magnus@kibibyte.se thanks I have created a new version of l 23 Mar 2007 12:23:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31354 First, let me introduce myself. I'm a wannabe Debian Developer and also a contributor to the Exim MTA. My Debian "portfolio": http://qa.debian.org/d 23 Mar 2007 05:23:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31352 Pyspf still had default modifier. I added a flag to turn it off. However, which is better: a) Ignore it, to match RFC. b) Using probably means an 17 Mar 2007 11:39:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31284 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: >> For an SPF policy using a:%{h} the mechanism should match for >> IP 195.7.77.17 - please correct me if that's wrong. > T 16 Mar 2007 09:20:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31259 Roberto Alsina wrote: > what's one supposed to do on the mail server if a client uses > that kind of HELO? Not important, but I am a curious guy :-) 16 Mar 2007 02:33:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31251 As the subject says. Thanks to all the help I got on this list, RaSPF now passes the test suite (and does the exact same thing as PySPF on the libspf 15 Mar 2007 15:31:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31243 Hello, I am confused by this test. It says it's about 8.1/6 which would be: The following macro letters are expanded in term arguments: s 15 Mar 2007 09:46:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31210 Helo, I am using the test suite, and I don't understand one piece of zonedata: example2.com: - SPF: [ 'v=spf1', 'mx' ] Is this supposed to me 12 Mar 2007 11:59:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31163 Corrects problem with int/size_t size differences by replacing "int" with "size_t" where ever gcc complained about it. Also replaces "int" with "sockl 09 Mar 2007 05:06:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31137 I think there is a problem related to the sizeof(int) != sizeof(size_t) when compiling on Linux/AMD/EMT 64 systems, and was wondering if anybody else 08 Mar 2007 09:55:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31133 I have a few issues when attempting to compile libspf2 1.2.5 on Solaris 10 (sparc). 1. One of the build scripts (libtool?) assumes that the "grep" 07 Mar 2007 11:25:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31125 I've been fighting with getting things working on Solaris 10. After identifying/fixing a couple problems with the build, I sent in a bug report via 06 Mar 2007 17:28:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31095 I found a solution, which I think is nice. I used Ragel (http://www.cs.queensu.ca/~thurston/ragel/) to create a finite state machine which implemen 04 Mar 2007 19:52:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31076 I am stumbling here. How can I validate a domain-spec? Here's what PySPF does: PAT_CHAR = r'%(%|_|-|(\{[^\}]*\}))' RE_TOPLAB = re.compile(r'\.(?:[0 03 Mar 2007 17:33:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31061 I am adding support for type 99 records to a library (UDNS). Anyone can tell me a domain that has type 99 records and what they should be, so I can 03 Mar 2007 09:57:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31044 Hello, I have been working for a few weeks in writing a "new" SPF implementation in C. Why? * libspf.org seems to be down * libspf2.org's bug re 03 Mar 2007 05:46:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31036 How does one apply different restrictions to messages that get a SPF pass from postfix-policyd-spf-perl than are applied to messages that do not? Her 02 Mar 2007 07:16:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/31002 Hello, Attached is the file I used for SUSE and the python-policyd-spf -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale 01 Mar 2007 21:41:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/30987 Boyd, This is great stuff. Keep it coming. I'm hoping this one: http://www.openspf.org/Software#python-postfix-policyd-spf is on your list too. 01 Mar 2007 14:45:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/30982 Hello, I have attached the tar file for SUSE. -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047 ------- To 01 Mar 2007 14:39:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/30980 Hello, Attached is the entire directory and spec file I use for SUSE. -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale 01 Mar 2007 13:49:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/30974