Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 04 Jul 2009 14:07:25 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg We just released jSPF 0.9.7 passing both rfc4408-tests-2008.08.yml and current trunk's rfc4408-tests.yml. Please update the Implementations page, whe 26 Jun 2009 05:40:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34830 On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, karan pott wrote: > I have made all the necessary changes to libspf2 (1.2.9) to port it to > Windows. It has been tested on Wind 21 Apr 2009 11:11:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34679 Hi Shevek, I have made all the necessary changes to libspf2 (1.2.9) to port it to Windows. It has been tested on Windows also. I like to submit my ch 21 Apr 2009 03:44:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34678 Thanks. I'll have a look. Lack of an "@" in an email address is not RFC complaint, but the policy server should not crash regardless. Scott K --- 20 Apr 2009 13:17:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34677 For about half an hour this morning, policyd-spf was halting with error 1 on many spf checks. One such crash was reported in mail.log as follows: 20 Apr 2009 12:24:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34676 Thanks Shevek, Here is the modified file. the change is at line 350, Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks and Regards, Karan. _____ 16 Apr 2009 20:48:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34674 Thanks Shevek, Here is the modified file. the change is at line 350, Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks and Regards, Karan. ____ 16 Apr 2009 20:46:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34673 On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 14:12 +0530, karan pott wrote: > Hi, > > We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam > functionality on wind 16 Apr 2009 03:42:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34672 On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 12:04 +0530, karan pott wrote: > Hi Shevek, > > I have spent a bit of effort to make libspf2 1.2.9 to be compilable on > Window 16 Apr 2009 03:40:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34671 Hi Shevek, I have spent a bit of effort to make libspf2 1.2.9 to be compilable on Windows with Visual Studio 2005. However, while testing I figured o 09 Apr 2009 23:34:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34662 Hi, I must admit, I feel encouraged with the response I am receiving on this. Very special thanks to all :) Hi G.W. Haywood, Thanks for your inputs 06 Apr 2009 04:17:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34661 Hi there, On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, karan pott wrote: > Okay. I got it. Porting needs to be done for Windows. In case I like > to offer my effort for this 04 Apr 2009 02:33:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34659 Thanks Scott, Okay. I got it. Porting needs to be done for Windows. In case I like to offer my effort for this, can you please let me know what proce 03 Apr 2009 00:53:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34654 On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:12:46 +0530 (IST) karan pott <open_mind_core@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > Hi, >  > We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for an 20 Mar 2009 05:14:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34635  Hi,    We were using libspf2 (1.0.2) in our product for anti-spam  functionality on windows platform. Now, we want to upgrade to the  latest version 20 Mar 2009 01:42:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34634 spf2/spf.h does not #include <netinet/in.h>, but several headers it includes refer struct in_addr. This causes compilation errors when SPF is used by 08 Feb 2009 11:22:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34568 Hi Shevek, On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Shevek wrote: > On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 21:45 +0000, G.W. Haywood wrote: > > > > Memory usage graph for spfmilter usin 16 Dec 2008 02:06:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34374 On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 21:45 +0000, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > Memory usage graph for spfmilter using libspf2-1.2.9: > > http://www.jubileeg 15 Dec 2008 08:54:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34373 Hi there, Memory usage graph for spfmilter using libspf2-1.2.9: http://www.jubileegroup.co.uk/JOS/misc/spfmilter_memory_consumption_one_month.gif T 14 Dec 2008 13:45:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34372 Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> [01-12-2008 14:46]: > On Monday 01 December 2008 07:00, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: >> I've tried to report some b 01 Dec 2008 07:45:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34337 On Monday 01 December 2008 07:00, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: > Hello, > > I've tried to report some bugs today, using libspf2@rt.antarres.org. > Result 01 Dec 2008 05:46:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34336 Hello, I've tried to report some bugs today, using libspf2@rt.antarres.org. Result: A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more 01 Dec 2008 04:00:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34335 On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 02:39 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:52:15 +0100 > >>>>> Hannah Schroeter <hannah@schlund. 04 Nov 2008 08:31:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34327 Hi, >>>>> On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:52:15 +0100 >>>>> Hannah Schroeter <hannah@schlund.de> said: >@@ -615,7 +619,7 @@ SPF_dns_resolv_new(SPF_dns_server 29 Oct 2008 10:39:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34324 Hi! Just to be public about this (I've already talked in private about this with Scott): My patch about the result code for included, but missing do 28 Oct 2008 09:07:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34320 Hi! On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 02:27:28PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote: >On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:15:20AM +0100, Johann E. Klasek wrote: >>On Sat, Oc 28 Oct 2008 06:40:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34319 Hi! On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:15:20AM +0100, Johann E. Klasek wrote: >On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:48:32AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: >> >>>>> On Fr 28 Oct 2008 06:27:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34318 On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:48:32AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:02:36 +0200 > >>>>> Fredrik Pettai <pettai@nor 27 Oct 2008 19:15:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34317 Hi! On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:48:32AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:02:36 +0200 >>>>>> Fredrik Pettai <pettai@nordu.net 27 Oct 2008 06:52:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34316 Hi, >>>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:02:36 +0200 >>>>> Fredrik Pettai <pettai@nordu.net> said: pettai> This has been fixed by a patch in the FreeBSD Por 24 Oct 2008 09:48:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34314 On Friday 24 October 2008 12:02, Fredrik Pettai wrote: > AFAICS, this fix doesn't seem to be in the latest version of the > libspf2-1.2.8 source. May 24 Oct 2008 09:30:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34313 Hi, According to tests done by some people in the milter-greylist community, libspf2 (and possible libspf_alt) causes memory leaks on some OSes. See 24 Oct 2008 09:02:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34312 Hi! On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:29:26PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >[...] >>I have actually a few patches still pending with Shevek, and prepared 22 Oct 2008 03:28:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34311 On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:59:43 +0200 Hannah Schroeter <hannah@schlund.de> wrote: >Hi! > >On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:46:30AM -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wr 21 Oct 2008 15:29:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34307 Hi! On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:46:30AM -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: >On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Hannah Schroeter wrote: >> table in section 5.2 (recurs 21 Oct 2008 07:59:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34306 On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Hannah Schroeter wrote: > table in section 5.2 (recursive result of None should cause the include > mechanism to throw PermError 21 Oct 2008 07:46:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34305 Hello! When re-evaluating test results from the new libspf2 release, I get this: I have an spf record that includes: another domain. Say foo.examp 21 Oct 2008 07:10:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34304 On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 09:19 +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > >> P.S. Julian, test suite case? > > Speaking of which, this l 16 Oct 2008 16:06:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34286 On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think the presence of special processing for localhost is a anachronism > that should be deprecated 16 Oct 2008 11:20:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34283 Hi! On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:19:35AM +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote: >[...] >> I think the presence of special processing for localhost is a anachron 16 Oct 2008 10:52:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34282 After the fix, I don't see problems so far. Will put the thing into "production" environment later today. Scott Kitterman wrote: >> P.S. Julian, tes 15 Oct 2008 22:19:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34280 On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:54:44 +0100 Shevek <spf@anarres.org> wrote: >On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 00:10 +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote: >> Scott Kitterman wrote: 15 Oct 2008 17:13:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34272 On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:54:44 +0100 Shevek <spf@anarres.org> wrote: >On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 00:10 +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote: >> Scott Kitterman wrote: 15 Oct 2008 16:16:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34271 On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 00:10 +0400, Eugene Crosser wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. > > This does not loo 15 Oct 2008 15:54:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34269 On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 18:34 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > One of the Ubuntu devs should have just mailed you a patch. I haven't seen > it. While 15 Oct 2008 15:45:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34268 One of the Ubuntu devs should have just mailed you a patch. I haven't seen it. Scott K ...... Original Message ....... On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:22:4 15 Oct 2008 15:34:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34267 On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:25 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday 15 October 2008 16:10, Eugene Crosser wrote: > > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > 15 Oct 2008 15:22:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34266 On Wednesday 15 October 2008 16:10, Eugene Crosser wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. > > This does not loo 15 Oct 2008 13:25:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34261 Scott Kitterman wrote: > There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. This does not look good to me. The old one: $ /usr/local/libspf2-1.2.5/bin/spfqu 15 Oct 2008 13:10:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34260 There is (at last) a new libspf2 release. All the patches that I had collected from people were looked at and the issues addressed either by that p 15 Oct 2008 09:59:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34255 Stuart D. Gathman ha scritto: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> So, if anyone is interested I expect them to add a new option (let's 25 Aug 2008 08:28:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34165 On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > So, if anyone is interested I expect them to add a new option (let's say > -s/--server ip[:port]) to th 25 Aug 2008 08:10:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34162 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Julian Mehnle ha scritto: >>> Can we instea 25 Aug 2008 04:43:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34161 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> For pyspf I didn't find the announcement wrt 2008.08. > Julian mentioned it in the recent thread on the test suite. Yeah, 22 Aug 2008 14:10:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34159 On Thursday 21 August 2008 04:52, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Hi, after we have sorted out how test suite test results > *could* be published I added Int 21 Aug 2008 12:59:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34158 Hi, after we have sorted out how test suite test results *could* be published I added InterPC.SPF 1.1 with a link to Eddy's article here (the test out 21 Aug 2008 01:52:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34157 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> gnu.gcj.runtime ??? I guess you are using g 21 Aug 2008 01:13:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34156 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> with 2008.08 jSPF 0.9.6 fails the macromani 21 Aug 2008 00:53:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34155 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > with 2008.08 jSPF 0.9.6 fails the macromania test because %- and %_ are > inco 20 Aug 2008 12:01:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34153 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > gnu.gcj.runtime ??? I guess you are using gcj and not a JAVA(tm) > virtual mac 20 Aug 2008 11:43:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34152 On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > [INFO] Surefire report directory: > > /home/julian/tmp/apache-jspf-0.9.6/target/surefire-reports > > 20 Aug 2008 10:24:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34151 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Out last release (jSPF 0.9.6) has been done 20 Aug 2008 10:22:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34150 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Try to remove the "-Plocal" and give it one 20 Aug 2008 10:12:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34149 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > What about it guys? I would "certainly" vote for jSPF as > "certified", but what about the next implementation that > co 20 Aug 2008 08:44:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34148 On Wednesday 20 August 2008 09:15, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Scott Kitterman ha scritto: > > Currently I think pyspf is supporting libspf2, Mail::SPF:: 20 Aug 2008 07:41:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34147 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Out last release (jSPF 0.9.6) has been done when 2007.05 was out and > the tes 20 Aug 2008 07:35:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34146 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Kitterman wrote: > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > > Wouldn't it worth to pub 20 Aug 2008 07:15:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34145 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Try to remove the "-Plocal" and give it one more try, please. > Here it works 20 Aug 2008 07:00:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34144 On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > IMHO, the best thing would be to have those tuples published on a web page. If > it were also possibl 20 Aug 2008 06:26:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34143 On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >Not any less standard than the spfquery protocol. The 'spfd' program is > >about as old as the 'spfq 20 Aug 2008 06:15:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34141 Scott Kitterman ha scritto: > Currently I think pyspf is supporting libspf2, Mail::SPF::Query, and > Mail::SPF style spfquery. Please let's not add 20 Aug 2008 06:15:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34142 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Julian Mehnle ha scritto: >>> More precisel 20 Aug 2008 05:26:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34140 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: >>> Julian Mehn 20 Aug 2008 05:10:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34139 On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:49:02 +0000 Julian Mehnle <julian@mehnle.net> wrote: >Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Julian Mehnle ha scritto: ... >> > > Using the 20 Aug 2008 05:09:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34138 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > > Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > > > You'll see tha 20 Aug 2008 05:00:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34136 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > > Can we instead agree instead on having a public 20 Aug 2008 04:49:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34135 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > > More precisely, you have to convince someone who 20 Aug 2008 04:42:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34137 Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > Julian Mehnle ha scritto: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Stefano Bagnara wrote: >>> Probably 20 Aug 2008 04:00:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34134 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Probably running java applications is diffi 20 Aug 2008 03:54:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34133 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Probably running java applications is difficult for you as running perl > appl 20 Aug 2008 03:39:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34131 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> Stuart D. Gathman ha scritto: >>> Agreed. But I'm pretty sure it is due to not having come up w 20 Aug 2008 03:37:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34132 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alessandro Vesely wrote: > I'm thinking about Courier. BTW, it has its own testsuite, see e.g. > http:/ 20 Aug 2008 03:17:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34130 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman ha scritto: > > Agreed. But I'm pretty sure it is due to no 20 Aug 2008 03:00:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34129 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > Maybe any implementation that passes the test suite should be > conditionally certified - with the person(s) or organizatio 20 Aug 2008 02:30:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34128 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> IMHO it is bad for OpenSPF to fail to tell how implementations can be >> listed between complian 20 Aug 2008 02:27:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34127 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > > The jSPF tester hav 20 Aug 2008 02:06:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34126 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > What about it guys? I would "certainly" vote for jS 19 Aug 2008 09:47:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34125 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > What about it guys? I would "certainly" vote for jSPF as "certified", but > what about the next impl 19 Aug 2008 09:26:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34124 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > My effort to make the tester "implementation agnostic" is really to gain some > more trust from you whe 19 Aug 2008 09:16:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34123 Stuart D. Gathman ha scritto: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> Having an external testsuite allow you to check bugs in the testsuit 19 Aug 2008 08:56:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34122 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > Having an external testsuite allow you to check bugs in the testsuites too. > Often people that wrote t 19 Aug 2008 07:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34121 Julian Mehnle ha scritto: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> I tested 2008.08 against jSPF and everythin 19 Aug 2008 01:26:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34120 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefano Bagnara wrote: > I tested 2008.08 against jSPF and everything works. Very good. > I also test 18 Aug 2008 13:59:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34117 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > > Next stop: 2008.08 release 18 Aug 2008 13:47:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34116 Stuart D. Gathman ha scritto: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > >>> Next stop: 2008.08 release announcement. > > IMO, any test-suite c 18 Aug 2008 11:02:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34115 On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > IMO, any test-suite changes should be double checked by running > against as many existing implementa 18 Aug 2008 10:18:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34114 On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > Next stop: 2008.08 release announcement. IMO, any test-suite changes should be double checked by run 18 Aug 2008 09:18:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34113 Julian Mehnle wrote: > Next stop: 2008.08 release announcement. Good, maybe add it to the "news" on the Web site, we didn't have many news so far th 18 Aug 2008 07:00:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34111 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mail::SPF 2.006 has been released, bringing a few minor features and bug fixes: http://search.cpan. 18 Aug 2008 00:37:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34109 On Sunday 17 August 2008 12:46, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote: > On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Sunday 17 August 2008 12:34, Boyd Lynn Ge 17 Aug 2008 09:49:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/34107