Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:16:12 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg It's only a little bit overdue (haha, really, haha) but you can now submit patches to libspf2 as PRs on github. https://github.com/shevek/libspf2 I 28 Jan 2012 01:03:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36275 Hi again! Sorry. I attached the wrong patch. This is the right one now. Greetings, Wolfgang Wolfgang Breyha wrote, on 01.06.2011 17:46: > Hi! > > 01 Jun 2011 08:52:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36144 Hi! The attached patch fixes two things in libspf2 1.2.9 *) if spf results to NONE or anything else without SPF record no received_header and com 01 Jun 2011 08:46:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36143 Hi, I think I might have found a bug in the libspf2 library, please correct me if I'm wrong. I wrote some code that uses SPF_dns_lookup to resolve an 17 Mar 2011 02:39:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36132 From: Florian Forster <ff@octo.it> This patch changes the "result" buffer to a character array of a fixed size. Also, the result is now printed as 23 Jan 2011 06:51:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36085 From: Florian Forster <ff@octo.it> It's very annoying to be shown the "usage" output and not know *why*. This patch prints an explanation to STDERR 23 Jan 2011 06:51:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36084 From: Florian Forster <ff@octo.it> The function SPF_request_query_rcptto() checks whether the "rcpt_to" string argument contains the "@" character. I 23 Jan 2011 06:47:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/36083 Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:13:07 +0100 >>>>> Benoit Branciard <Benoit.Branciard@univ-paris1.fr> said: Benoit> below is a message I posted some 02 Nov 2010 10:03:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35949 Hi, below is a message I posted some months ago about "ip6:" SPF mechanism not being handled correctly by libspf2. Googling in the mailing list arc 02 Nov 2010 09:13:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35948 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 William Ahern wrote: > Is anyone else bothered by the fact that the grammar requires > backtracking? S 27 Apr 2010 03:11:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/devel/35636