<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SPF | Deployment</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>13 Feb  2012 03:59:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>A Christmas greeting to cheer you, my dear friend !</title>
<description>A Christmas greeting to cheer you, my dear friend ! As you know, we are reliable wholesaler , and we can offer you the top quality item , they are ver</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2008 17:33:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/34354</link>
</item><item>
<title>Confirm your unsubscription from spf-deployment.</title>
<description>Hi! We received a request to unsubscribe you from spf-deployment.  If this is what you want, just reply to this message or click on the link below,</description>
<pubDate>01 Apr  2008 03:37:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/33542</link>
</item><item>
<title>6.74% of domains have SPF, ~35% of e-mails have SPF</title>
<description>Frank Ellermann wrote: &amp;gt; [...] &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve found this interesting article: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http://www.usrlocal.com/stories.phtml?sid=1716&amp;amp;from=rss Let me add that acc</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 03:37:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31854</link>
</item><item>
<title>6.74%</title>
<description>Hi, looking for an excuse to test that this list again works for readers on &amp;lt;http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.deployment&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve found this inte</description>
<pubDate>12 May  2007 10:55:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31851</link>
</item><item>
<title>BIND 9.4.0 with support for the SPF RR type has been released</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, BIND 9.4 has been released. This is the first non-beta release that directly supports the SP</description>
<pubDate>25 Feb  2007 16:20:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/30942</link>
</item><item>
<title>The 2007 SPF Council Elections</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HTML: http://www.openspf.org/Council_Election/2007-01 - ----------------------------------------------</description>
<pubDate>22 Dec  2006 15:38:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/29733</link>
</item><item>
<title>Hotmail and Received-SPF Header</title>
<description>I reported to Hotmail in January that hotmail (when viewing headers in hotmail) that it showed Received-SPF headers as just Received: Yes I know its</description>
<pubDate>07 Oct  2006 04:21:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/28574</link>
</item><item>
<title>Your account might be compromised!</title>
<description>PayPal letter    http://motor.anytime.ro/include/smtp.php&amp;quot;]               http://www.verisign.com&amp;quot;]       Protect Your Password</description>
<pubDate>06 May  2006 10:56:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/26999</link>
</item><item>
<title>The 2006 SPF Council Elections</title>
<description>HTML: http://new.openspf.org/Council_Election/2006-01 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The 2006 SPF Council</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2006 07:19:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25777</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF and ISP&amp;#039;s restricting SMTP traffic ??&amp;#039;s</title>
<description>We have a corporate email server. Most of our road warriors connect via VPN or Webmail and directly connect to our server for send/receive.  A few us</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2006 07:39:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25727</link>
</item><item>
<title>The 2006 SPF Council Elections</title>
<description>HTML: http://new.openspf.org/Council_Election/2006-01 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The 2006 SPF Council</description>
<pubDate>01 Jan  2006 16:23:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25385</link>
</item><item>
<title>FYI: Community Vote: Council Election Procedures</title>
<description>Julian Mehnle wrote in &amp;lt;spf-discuss&amp;gt;:  &amp;gt; Dear community,  &amp;gt; I am pleased to announce the next community vote of the SPF &amp;gt; project, &amp;quot;Council Election</description>
<pubDate>18 Dec  2005 22:22:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25256</link>
</item><item>
<title>spfmilter sometimes rejects sometimes accepts from same host</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, My spfmilter is sometimes rejecting mail from a mailing list, but on other occasions, is accept</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2005 06:48:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24907</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF implmentation</title>
<description>Dear friends,  Please send me the steps for implementing the SPF records for our mail system. We&amp;#039;re running public DNS and I&amp;#039;ve already made the entr</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2005 06:08:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24704</link>
</item><item>
<title>draft-lyon-senderid-core</title>
<description>FYI, the first of two &amp;quot;Senderid&amp;quot; appeals has been published: http://ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-draft-lyon-senderid-core For a &amp;quot;clickable&amp;quot; version s</description>
<pubDate>30 Aug  2005 16:21:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/23714</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Karl TRAXLER ist auÃŸer Haus.</title>
<description>Le mer 2005-06-15 a 06:17:12 -0400, Karl TRAXLER &amp;lt;karl.traxler@logis.at&amp;gt; a dit: &amp;gt; &amp;lt;unlurk&amp;gt; turn off your goddamned auto-reply, FFS. (pardon my lang</description>
<pubDate>15 Jun  2005 11:13:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20365</link>
</item><item>
<title>Please unsubscribe yourself - WAS Re: welcome to spf-deployment</title>
<description>Oh, my lord. You must be kidding.  First, check the headers. Who was the recipient? Do you even know HOW to check the headers?  Second, this is NOT</description>
<pubDate>14 Jun  2005 23:23:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20357</link>
</item><item>
<title>Karl TRAXLER ist außer Haus.</title>
<description>Ich werde ab 09.06.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 20.06.2005.  Die Rückmeldung bezieht sich auf ein Mail mit folgendem Thema: [spf-dep</description>
<pubDate>13 Jun  2005 22:37:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20336</link>
</item><item>
<title>[no subject]</title>
<description>---------------------------------------------------------------------- List Instructions To Send a message to the list: Send an email message to sp</description>
<pubDate>06 Apr  2005 09:26:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18780</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [SPAM] Re: Computer Business Review Online: Sender authentication hops off the standards track</title>
<description>Hello, I clicked on the link below and it comes back &amp;quot;Document not found&amp;quot;  -----Original Message----- From: owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com [mai</description>
<pubDate>04 Mar  2005 08:28:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18071</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Computer Business Review Online: Sender authentication hops off the standards track</title>
<description>Chris Zumbrunn wrote in spf-discuss: &amp;gt; http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=44D2955C-3C04-4BA1-AC45-AF8277B8B455 Thanks, that could be a l</description>
<pubDate>04 Mar  2005 07:42:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18069</link>
</item><item>
<title>Setup Wizard - names</title>
<description>When I run spf setup wizard, it reports &amp;#039;This wizard found 4 names for the MX servers for dwyer.com: relay.cosmoweb.net, mail, mail1.stickdog.com, and</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2005 05:57:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/17423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Broken SPF implementation</title>
<description>Hi Guys, Is there a dedicated list or entity where broken SPF implementation (both publishing and checking) can be reported? I got this guy rejectin</description>
<pubDate>30 Nov  2004 19:09:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15782</link>
</item><item>
<title>RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement</title>
<description>VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL RESULT Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and see the results of your voting for members of the SPF council. Votin</description>
<pubDate>30 Nov  2004 01:41:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15732</link>
</item><item>
<title>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 5th AND LAST REMINDER</title>
<description>CALL  TO  VOTE  FOR  THE  SPF  COUNCIL 5th  AND  LAST  REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2004 12:50:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15666</link>
</item><item>
<title>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER</title>
<description>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL 4th REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2004 02:15:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15654</link>
</item><item>
<title>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 3rd REMINDER</title>
<description>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL 3rd REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting</description>
<pubDate>26 Nov  2004 03:43:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15582</link>
</item><item>
<title>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 2nd REMINDER</title>
<description>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL 2nd REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2004 04:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15546</link>
</item><item>
<title>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- REMINDER</title>
<description>CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting end</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2004 00:12:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15492</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mail::SPF::Query</title>
<description>Hi, First thing first: should any issues related to Mail::SPF::Query be discussed here? If not, where? Please guide. Main issue: I was trying to co</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2004 22:09:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/14208</link>
</item><item>
<title>2822 solutions</title>
<description>On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:06:12AM -0400, spf2@kitterman.com wrote: | | For myself, I would find it acceptable if there were an unburdened | alternat</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2004 07:23:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13767</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Practical guidance for ESP&amp;#039;s (SPF renamed to SenderID?)</title>
<description>The page: http://spf.pobox.com/esps.html talks about SenderID instead of SPF. I understand that technically SPF and SenderID are practically the same</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2004 00:57:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13742</link>
</item><item>
<title>Practical guidance for ESP&amp;#039;s</title>
<description>I hope I haven&amp;#039;t started too big of a food fight with my last question :-) Here goes with the underlying concern, and I&amp;#039;d be interested in a pragmat</description>
<pubDate>25 Oct  2004 16:31:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13730</link>
</item><item>
<title>rejecting by default</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:34:01PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: | |    One of my customer, told me, &amp;quot;When SPF will be really |    deployed, w</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2004 10:41:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13667</link>
</item><item>
<title>two sides of the coin</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 11:49:14AM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: |    SPF is a tool to avoid E-mail forgery adding &amp;quot;?all&amp;quot; |    is just breaking</description>
<pubDate>24 Oct  2004 10:37:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13666</link>
</item><item>
<title>What is Hotmail actually supporting?</title>
<description>We&amp;#039;re (among other things) an email marketing provider, and getting close to taking the plunge with our clients and having them create SPF records.</description>
<pubDate>23 Oct  2004 08:59:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13622</link>
</item><item>
<title>the &amp;quot;?all&amp;quot; rationnal</title>
<description>Bonjour a tous,     Seems a LOT of SPF deployed include &amp;quot;?all&amp;quot;     see AOL:     v=spf1 ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2004 08:49:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13552</link>
</item><item>
<title>New news</title>
<description>New news articles at http://www.spf-help.net/newnews.html It&amp;#039;s updated everytime I get notices of news stuff on the &amp;#039;net - most days actually, unles</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2004 07:40:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13312</link>
</item><item>
<title>Another company deploying spf :-)</title>
<description>Looks like this is the latest company to start using spf to make money. http://www.internetweek.com/allStories/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=50500290&amp;amp;</description>
<pubDate>18 Oct  2004 08:45:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13278</link>
</item><item>
<title>Terry Brummet/UFA is out of the office.</title>
<description>I will be out of the office starting 10/08/2004 and will not return until 10/12/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. ------- To unsu</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2004 21:02:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/12944</link>
</item><item>
<title>november events</title>
<description>November seems to be National Antispam Month: Nov 1-3: MAAWG meeting, http://www.maawg.org/ Atlanta, GA Nov 2-4: ISPcon, http://www.ispcon.com/ Santa</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2004 15:20:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/12940</link>
</item><item>
<title>deployment discussions to begin soon</title>
<description>Hi folks, Now that the dust is beginning to settle, I think we can start to discuss deployment considerations. I was in Tokyo earlier this month tal</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2004 15:11:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/12939</link>
</item><item>
<title>Terry Brummet/UFA is out of the office.</title>
<description>I will be out of the office starting 09/18/2004 and will not return until 09/27/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. ------- To unsu</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2004 21:03:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/12174</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF Agent</title>
<description>I just joined and may have joined the wrong group.   I am trying to find out if anyone is working with Symantec (or not working with Symantec) to co</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2004 15:25:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/12146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Question on Deployment</title>
<description>Hello,  I am trying to update my DNS with a wildcard to include all subdomains in my SPF record.  I am using BIND my root domain is something like a</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2004 12:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/10634</link>
</item><item>
<title>Gates backs SenderID</title>
<description>Bill Gates just put out a letter on spam that mentions SenderID:  http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/execmail/ This was timed to coincide with the Sen</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2004 10:00:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/7630</link>
</item><item>
<title>Missing Files in SPF implementation</title>
<description>Hi, This is Sivakumar S, trying to implement SPF. I have completed installing all components / libraries, without any problems. But when I tried to s</description>
<pubDate>13 Jun  2004 22:24:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/7629</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-discuss] usefulness of postmaster account</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 June 2004 10:54 am, Andy Bakun wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 12:25, Alan Hodgson wrote: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2004 11:43:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/7625</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [spf-discuss] AOL to ESPs: Comply with SPF, Or Else</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 11 June 2004 02:46 am, Jon Kyme wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Should we send an email to every postmaster@&amp;lt;domai</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2004 09:59:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/7622</link>
</item><item>
<title>Deploying SPF</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think it is time to start pushing for everyone to adopt SPF. With AOL&amp;#039;s announcement that they won&amp;#039;t</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2004 12:29:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/7619</link>
</item><item>
<title>These should turn on their -all also Microsoft with _ep Caller-id should do the step</title>
<description>Dear meng: We have done it now for 559 Domains so far. without any ! serious problems. and some facts just from one of our gateways... timeframe</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2004 13:46:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/7618</link>
</item><item>
<title>welcome to spf-deployment</title>
<description>Hi everyone and welcome to the SPF-deployment mailing list. This list brings together a critical mass of elements in the email ecosystem. I hope to</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2004 10:02:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/7617</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

