Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 01:12:36 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi! We received a request to unsubscribe you from spf-deployment. If this is what you want, just reply to this message or click on the link below, 01 Apr 2008 03:37:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/33542 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yannick wrote: > Julian Mehnle a écrit : > > Let me add that according to current studies about 35% of 22 May 2007 13:55:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31896 Frank Ellermann a écrit : > I've found this interesting article: > > http://www.usrlocal.com/stories.phtml?sid=1716&from=rss Very interesting link.. 22 May 2007 13:43:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31895 Am Montag, 14. Mai 2007 19:40 schrieb Iovinelli, Joseph: > REMOVE > > ------------------------------------------- > Manage your SPF list subscriptio 14 May 2007 10:55:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31862 Cool neither did I Kurt Osadchuk -----Original Message----- From: Augie Schwer [mailto:augie.schwer@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:38 PM To 14 May 2007 10:42:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31861 I manually unsubscribed him so there's no need to discuss it further on the list. Scott K ------------------------------------------- Manage your 14 May 2007 10:41:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31860 REMOVE ------------------------------------------- Manage your SPF list subscriptions at http://www.openspf.org/Forums Powered by Listbox: http://w 14 May 2007 10:40:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31859 On 5/14/07, Tony Toews <tony@granite.ab.ca> wrote: > At 12:51 PM 2007-05-14 -0400, Manuel Romero wrote: > >REMOVE > Manuel > Please follow the direct 14 May 2007 10:38:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31858 At 12:51 PM 2007-05-14 -0400, Manuel Romero wrote: >REMOVE Manuel Please follow the directions of the bottom of this and all mailing list emails 14 May 2007 10:05:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31857 REMOVE -----Original Message----- From: Julian Mehnle [mailto:julian@mehnle.net] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 3:37 AM To: Manuel Romero Subject: 14 May 2007 09:51:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31856 Frank Ellermann wrote: > [...] > I've found this interesting article: > > http://www.usrlocal.com/stories.phtml?sid=1716&from=rss Let me add that acc 14 May 2007 03:37:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31854 Hi, looking for an excuse to test that this list again works for readers on <http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.deployment> I've found this inte 12 May 2007 10:55:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/31851 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, BIND 9.4 has been released. This is the first non-beta release that directly supports the SP 25 Feb 2007 16:20:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/30942 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HTML: http://www.openspf.org/Council_Election/2007-01 - ---------------------------------------------- 22 Dec 2006 15:38:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/29733 I reported to Hotmail in January that hotmail (when viewing headers in hotmail) that it showed Received-SPF headers as just Received: Yes I know its 07 Oct 2006 04:21:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/28574 PayPal letter http://motor.anytime.ro/include/smtp.php"] http://www.verisign.com"] Protect Your Password 06 May 2006 10:56:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/26999 HTML: http://new.openspf.org/Council_Election/2006-01 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The 2006 SPF Council 30 Jan 2006 07:19:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25777 Thanks to all for your input. Tom -----Original Message----- From: Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com [mailto:Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com] Sent: Thursday 27 Jan 2006 06:13:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25747 Tom Fleischmann wrote: > A few users, for various reasons, must use a non-VPN POP3 client. > They are also connected through an ISP that requires outg 26 Jan 2006 14:53:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25738 Tom Fleischmann wrote: > We have a corporate email server. Most of our road warriors connect via > VPN or Webmail and directly connect to our server 25 Jan 2006 07:50:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25730 On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 10:39 -0500, Tom Fleischmann wrote: > We have a corporate email server. Most of our road warriors connect > via VPN or Webmail a 25 Jan 2006 07:45:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25729 You could include their SMTP servers in your SPF record. Generally, it would be easier to use SASL and have these users submit to your server via po 25 Jan 2006 07:42:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25728 We have a corporate email server. Most of our road warriors connect via VPN or Webmail and directly connect to our server for send/receive. A few us 25 Jan 2006 07:39:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25727 HTML: http://new.openspf.org/Council_Election/2006-01 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The 2006 SPF Council 01 Jan 2006 16:23:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25385 Julian Mehnle wrote in <spf-discuss>: > Dear community, > I am pleased to announce the next community vote of the SPF > project, "Council Election 18 Dec 2005 22:22:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/25256 I'd like to suggest that this thread is better suited to spf-discuss or spf-help and perhaps it ought to be followed up one of those places.... Scot 28 Nov 2005 16:48:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24946 Craig Whitmore wrote: >> The good news is that the mail server in question satisfies both the >> PTR and the MX requirements. So you should get eithe 28 Nov 2005 16:37:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24945 > The good news is that the mail server in question satisfies both the PTR > and the MX requirements. So you should get either > PASS or NONE, right 28 Nov 2005 15:37:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24943 On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:01:48PM -0800, Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com wrote: [good summary of two sets of two records from two nameservers deleted] 28 Nov 2005 14:46:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24942 Matthew.van.Eerde wrote: > The good news is that the mail server in question satisfies both the > PTR and the MX requirements. So you should get eith 28 Nov 2005 14:21:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24936 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > G.D.S.Marshall wrote: >> My spfmilter is sometimes rejecting mail from a mailing list, but on >> othe 28 Nov 2005 14:10:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24935 Robert Barclay wrote: > This domain appears to have two nameservers that don't exactly match. > In my experience this seems to be the most common caus 28 Nov 2005 14:01:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24934 This domain appears to have two nameservers that don't exactly match. In my experience this seems to be the most common cause of inconsistent results 28 Nov 2005 13:40:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24933 Mark Shewmaker wrote: > $ host -t txt buoy.com > buoy.com text "\\\"v=spf1 mx -all\\\"" > buoy.com text "\\\"v=spf1 ptr -all\\\"" Huh? 28 Nov 2005 13:38:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24932 On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:25:22AM -0800, Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com wrote: > > buoy.com has two SPF records: > > v=spf1 ptr -all > v=spf1 mx -all 28 Nov 2005 11:58:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24930 G.D.S.Marshall wrote: > My spfmilter is sometimes rejecting mail from a mailing list, but on > other occasions, is accepting mail from the same mailin 28 Nov 2005 10:25:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24929 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, My spfmilter is sometimes rejecting mail from a mailing list, but on other occasions, is accept 27 Nov 2005 06:48:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24907 Janan Arnold wrote: > Not sure how you got my email address You got it because you're subscribed to spf-deployment, a rather quiet mailing list, un 17 Nov 2005 16:23:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24731 Not sure how you got my email address, but here is a link that might help you. http://www.openspf.org/ Janan Arnold Director of Internet Services Ch 17 Nov 2005 06:43:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24708 Dear friends, Please send me the steps for implementing the SPF records for our mail system. We're running public DNS and I've already made the entr 17 Nov 2005 06:08:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/24704 FYI, the first of two "Senderid" appeals has been published: http://ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-draft-lyon-senderid-core For a "clickable" version s 30 Aug 2005 16:21:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/23714 Frank Ellermann wrote: > FYI, the first of two "Senderid" appeals has been published: > http://ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-draft-lyon-senderid-core > 30 Aug 2005 16:09:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/23715 Is there any whay I can block receiving mail from empty sender name On 6/15/05, admin@rensup.com <admin@rensup.com> wrote: > > The SPF Deployment 24 Jun 2005 06:02:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20664 Ich werde ab 09.06.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 20.06.2005. Die Rückmeldung bezieht sich auf ein Mail mit folgendem Thema: [spf-dep 15 Jun 2005 20:37:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20370 Ich werde ab 09.06.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 20.06.2005. Die Rückmeldung bezieht sich auf ein Mail mit folgendem Thema: RE: [spf 15 Jun 2005 20:07:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20369 Le mer 2005-06-15 a 06:17:12 -0400, Karl TRAXLER <karl.traxler@logis.at> a dit: > <unlurk> turn off your goddamned auto-reply, FFS. (pardon my lang 15 Jun 2005 11:13:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20365 The SPF Deployment list is NOT Unsolicited Commercial Email. It is a subscriber based news list about SPF, Sender Policy Framework. It is neither comm 15 Jun 2005 10:11:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20361 I think what my good friend is trying to say is that this is not a UCE, it is a mailing list for an open source project. If you are receiving emails, 15 Jun 2005 01:34:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20355 Ich werde ab 09.06.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 20.06.2005. Die Rückmeldung bezieht sich auf ein Mail mit folgendem Thema: RE: [spf 14 Jun 2005 23:37:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20354 Oh, my lord. You must be kidding. First, check the headers. Who was the recipient? Do you even know HOW to check the headers? Second, this is NOT 14 Jun 2005 23:23:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20357 Matthew, I am not affiliated and do not know any party included in the original email. I want to know why I am getting this email. Life Plu 14 Jun 2005 21:24:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20350 Ich werde ab 09.06.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 20.06.2005. Die Rückmeldung bezieht sich auf ein Mail mit folgendem Thema: RE: [spf 14 Jun 2005 20:12:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20353 Neil Reade wrote: > Dear Sirs, > Why may I ask am *I* getting emails about updating SPF records > through *my* email server at Lifeplus-Europe 14 Jun 2005 11:09:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20343 Pardon me, but you are receiving emails from a list that someone at your organization signed up for. What on earth makes you think these message 14 Jun 2005 09:05:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20340 Dear Sirs, Why may I ask am I getting emails about updating SPF records through my email server at Lifeplus-Europe.com? Relaying throu 14 Jun 2005 01:12:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20338 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com >[mailto:owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com]On Behalf Of >senthilkumar.s@polar 13 Jun 2005 22:54:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20337 Ich werde ab 09.06.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 20.06.2005. Die Rückmeldung bezieht sich auf ein Mail mit folgendem Thema: [spf-dep 13 Jun 2005 22:37:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20336 Hi, Kindly help in the process of updating my SPF records with some more IP address that should send mails for our domain. Regards Senthilkumar V S 13 Jun 2005 22:11:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/20335 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- List Instructions To Send a message to the list: Send an email message to sp 06 Apr 2005 09:26:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18780 Ryer, Dave wrote: > Hello, I clicked on the link below and it comes back > "Document not found" All in one line. Here's a tiny <http://tinyurl.com 04 Mar 2005 15:13:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18097 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:32:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18079 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:32:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18078 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:32:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18077 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:32:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18076 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:31:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18075 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:31:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18073 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:30:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18072 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:30:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18074 Hello, I clicked on the link below and it comes back "Document not found" -----Original Message----- From: owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com [mai 04 Mar 2005 08:28:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18071 This email address is no longer active due to the massive amount of incoming spam. Please update your email address books to reflect my new address: 04 Mar 2005 08:27:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18070 Chris Zumbrunn wrote in spf-discuss: > http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=44D2955C-3C04-4BA1-AC45-AF8277B8B455 Thanks, that could be a l 04 Mar 2005 07:42:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/18069 On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:57:48AM -0500, Matt Dwyer wrote: | When I run spf setup wizard, it reports 'This wizard found 4 names for | the MX servers 10 Feb 2005 08:00:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/17425 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com >[mailto:owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com]On Behalf Of Matt Dwyer >Sent: Thu 10 Feb 2005 06:26:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/17424 When I run spf setup wizard, it reports 'This wizard found 4 names for the MX servers for dwyer.com: relay.cosmoweb.net, mail, mail1.stickdog.com, and 10 Feb 2005 05:57:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/17423 Hi Guys, Is there a dedicated list or entity where broken SPF implementation (both publishing and checking) can be reported? I got this guy rejectin 30 Nov 2004 19:09:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15782 VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL RESULT Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and see the results of your voting for members of the SPF council. Votin 30 Nov 2004 01:41:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15732 VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL RESULT Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and see the results of your voting for members of the SPF council. Votin 30 Nov 2004 01:09:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15731 Manuel Romero wrote: > How do I find out the backgrounds and platforms of the people > that are running for office? <http://www.spfvote.idimo.com/c 28 Nov 2004 15:28:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15672 Hello John, How do I find out the backgrounds and platforms of the people that are running for office? Thanks. -Manuel -----Original Message----- 28 Nov 2004 12:58:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15667 CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL 5th AND LAST REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members 28 Nov 2004 12:50:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15666 CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL 4th REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting 27 Nov 2004 02:15:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15654 CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL 3rd REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting 26 Nov 2004 03:43:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15582 CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL 2nd REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting 25 Nov 2004 04:04:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15546 CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL REMINDER Please visit http://www.spfvote.idimo.com and place your votes for members of the SPF council. Voting end 24 Nov 2004 00:12:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/15492 On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:09:47 +0800, M Z R <mzrahman@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to configure Mail::SPF::Query with Spamassassin. > Everyt 03 Nov 2004 02:21:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/14213 Hi, First thing first: should any issues related to Mail::SPF::Query be discussed here? If not, where? Please guide. Main issue: I was trying to co 02 Nov 2004 22:09:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/14208 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com >[mailto:owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com]On Behalf Of Meng Weng Wong >Sent: 01 Nov 2004 19:53:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/14173 Meng Weng Wong wrote: > yes, that is correct; that is what microsoft intends to do. MS intends to break all published SPF standards and policies... 31 Oct 2004 23:25:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/14131 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:02:14AM -0500, David Crooke wrote: | | I'd appreciate comments on this adaptation approach: | | 1. Keep the bounce addres 30 Oct 2004 18:18:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/14098 Jeremy Pullicino wrote: > I understand that technically SPF and SenderID are > practically the same That's not the case, they are very different. S 27 Oct 2004 16:02:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13925 In the following news release: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2004/oct04/10-25Sende rID.asp Ryan Hamlin , general manager of Microsoft' 27 Oct 2004 05:52:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13855 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:02:14AM -0500, David Crooke wrote: > I'd appreciate comments on this adaptation approach: > > 1. Keep the bounce address ( 26 Oct 2004 09:23:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13778 Meng Weng Wong wrote: >On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 06:31:40PM -0500, David Crooke wrote: >| >| I hope I haven't started too big of a food fight with my 26 Oct 2004 09:02:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13777 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com >[mailto:owner-spf-deployment@v2.listbox.com]On Behalf Of Meng Weng Wong >Sent: 26 Oct 2004 07:38:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13771 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:30:34AM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote: | | One-button mice are a terrible idea too, but they're part of | the environment, a 26 Oct 2004 07:32:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13770 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:21:37AM -0500, wayne wrote: | | Now the thing that really puzzles me Meng is that just yesterday you | told me that you do 26 Oct 2004 07:30:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13769 In <20041026142339.GN6162@dumbo.pobox.com> Meng Weng Wong <mengwong@dumbo.pobox.com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:06:12AM -0400, spf2@kitterm 26 Oct 2004 07:27:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13768 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:06:12AM -0400, spf2@kitterman.com wrote: | | For myself, I would find it acceptable if there were an unburdened | alternat 26 Oct 2004 07:23:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13767 In <20041026135228.GI6162@dumbo.pobox.com> Meng Weng Wong <mengwong@dumbo.pobox.com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 05:47:01AM -0400, John Glube w 26 Oct 2004 07:21:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13766 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:49:52AM -0400, spf2@kitterman.com wrote: | | DNS question then... | | Can, for example, lines 2 and 3 be published in a s 26 Oct 2004 07:17:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spf/deployment/13765