giampaolo at tomassoni
Jul 13, 2012, 11:36 AM
Post #1 of 1
No, I'm not meaning that. I'm instead following the Hardin suggestion, which works better with mass-check.
R: RE: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all"
I'm suggesting to use CIDR::Lite to avoid being fooled by stuff like +22.214.171.124/1 +0.0.0.0/1...
Benny Pedersen <me [at] junc> ha scritto:
Den 2012-07-13 19:44, Giampaolo Tomassoni skrev:
> Our hypothetic plugin could merge together CIDRs via
> and get the resultant merged, non-overlapping CIDRs via ->list(),
> then count
> the size of the allowed addresses (via something like 2^(32 -
> and fire rules like the ones you suggest.
so it fire if more then one ip is in spf ?, lets say more points if
more ips ?