jarif at iki
Mar 10, 2012, 4:36 AM
Post #2 of 2
(249 views)
Permalink
|
9.3.2012 18:59, Peter Tselios kirjoitti:
> Setup is:
> Stock Postfix of CentOS 6, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin 3.3.1
> Network Flow is:
> (Incoming)
> Internet-->Antispam/Relay Server-->Antivirus Server-->Mailbox
> Outgoing:
> Webmail-->Antivirus-->Antispam-->Internet
>
> Actually, the problem is more "intense" I believe.
> The issue is that not even the X-Spam headers added, althought I have
> set the $sa_tag_level_deflt is set to -150(!) and in the local.cf of
> spamassassin I have set the following rules:
> required_score 5
> ...
> ...
> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
> add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_
>
> Any ideas?
>
> (PS: Sorry to write on the top, but Yahoo! is not very helpful on that :)
>
OK, I can't help much, as I do not know Amavis. You are actually using
Amavis, and not SpamAssassin directly. SpamAssassin is just an add-on
livrary for Amavis in your setup.
I think /etc/spamassassin/* are NOT used by your setup.
Double check your postfix master.cf and verify that amavis is really
called with outgoing mail.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Απο:* Benny Pedersen <me [at] junc>
> *Προς:* users [at] spamassassin
> *Στάλθηκε:* 4:34 μ.μ. Παρασκευή, 9 Μαρτίου 2012
> *Θεμα:* Re: Trusted Networks and scoring
>
> Den 2012-03-09 09:11, Jari Fredriksson skrev:
>
>> No, SA will scan messages even if they originate from trusted_networks,
>> and X-Spam headers will be added.
>
> most sites bypass scanning of there own mails since its just ham
> (permit_mynetworks) in postfix, my point is why not learn ham in bayes ?
>
>> There is something else in your system deciding that the messages are
>> not passed to SpamAssassin.
>
> here i have removed all signs of permit_mynetworks in postfix main.cf,
> only keeping permit_sasl_autienticated
>
> there is other route in mailflows that could be the problem in not seen
> x-spam headers if using amavisd-new recipient domain must be local and
> spam score should be highter then spam_tag level, but that said i dont
> know if OP do use amavisd-new
>
>
>
>
>
|
signature.asc
