rwmaillists at googlemail
Nov 21, 2011, 5:50 AM
Post #3 of 6
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Re: Return Path Whitelists, RP_SAFE, RP_CERTIFIED, RP MATCHES
[In reply to]
> Was wondering if could have some advice, and I probably know what I'm
> going to do anyway, just wanted a few others opinions..
> I've been analysing a load of mail which is having it's SA score
> reduced by what looks like paid for whitelists. A view of the SA
> scores I'm seeing is:
> Rule Total Ham % Spam %
> RP_MATCHES_RCVD 161,165 142,559 88.5
> 18,606 11.5 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE 22,405 22,399
> 100 6 0 RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED 22,130
> 22,125 100 5 0 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL
> 12,794 43 0.3 12,751 99.7
> T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD 7,080 5,072 71.6
> 2,008 28.4
> Now looking at virtualls ALL of these they look like SPAM.
No they don't, you haven't read your own results correctly.
RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE and RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED are ~100% Ham. RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL
is a blacklist rule, so it's supposed to hit spam.
[T_]RP_MATCHES_RCVD are not ReturnPath whitelist rules:
describe RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
Everything related to ReturnPath.net/senderscore is working
remarkably well for you.
> For some reason I can't find any scores for T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD. Am I
> being dumn here? Does the T_ mean something I don't know?
T_* rules are under test, so it's an earlier name for RP_MATCHES_RCVD.