Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: users

painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush

 

 

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All SpamAssassin users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


jidanni at jidanni

Jan 25, 2010, 10:29 PM

Post #1 of 56 (1447 views)
Permalink
painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush

Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw

It's all because
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
header SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Received =~ /\bdynamic.hinet\.(?:com|net|org|info)/
describe SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Email passed through apparent spammer domain
score SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b 1.666

So how is anybody living in Taiwan supposed to mail things with honor?
They can't get another country, nor cause a revolution. You just paint
them all with one brush. What if you painted everybody in your home
country with one brush until they were supposed to overthrew the
telephone company or whatever?


admin at eregion

Jan 25, 2010, 10:41 PM

Post #2 of 56 (1385 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Am Dienstag 26 Januar 2010 schrieb jidanni [at] jidanni:
> Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
>
> It's all because
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
> header SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Received =~
> /\bdynamic.hinet\.(?:com|net|org|info)/ describe
> SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Email passed through apparent spammer
> domain score SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b 1.666
>
> So how is anybody living in Taiwan supposed to mail things with
> honor? They can't get another country, nor cause a revolution. You
> just paint them all with one brush. What if you painted everybody
> in your home country with one brush until they were supposed to
> overthrew the telephone company or whatever?
>

there were times where 90% of my spamcop submissions pointed at
hinet.net so there's that.
if there is some single person in taiwan who wants to exchange
legitimate email with some other single person outside taiwan they can
simply put each other in their whitelists.


--
gpg key fingerprint: 5F64 4C92 9B77 DE37 D184 C5F9 B013 44E7 27BD
763C


mic at npgx

Jan 25, 2010, 10:53 PM

Post #3 of 56 (1385 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Hi,

> Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
>
> It's all because
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
> header SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Received =~
> /\bdynamic.hinet\.(?:com|net|org|info)/ describe

I personally don't understand how this regex does all of Taiwan, all I can see
it do is hit the dynamic IP's of the hinet ISP, which to me is valid since
dynamic IP's really shouldn't be sending bulk mail.

Regards,

Michael.

> SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Email passed through apparent spammer
> domain score SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b 1.666
>
> So how is anybody living in Taiwan supposed to mail things with
> honor? They can't get another country, nor cause a revolution. You
> just paint them all with one brush. What if you painted everybody in
> your home country with one brush until they were supposed to
> overthrew the telephone company or whatever?
_______________________________________________
> This is being sent to: mic [at] npgx
> Sare-users mailing list
> Sare-users [at] maddoc
> http://lists.maddoc.net/mailman/listinfo/sare-users
------- End of Original Message -------


dave-sa at pooserville

Jan 25, 2010, 10:56 PM

Post #4 of 56 (1387 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

On 1/26/10 12:29 AM, "jidanni [at] jidanni" <jidanni [at] jidanni> wrote:

> So how is anybody living in Taiwan supposed to mail things with honor?
> They can't get another country, nor cause a revolution. You just paint
> them all with one brush. What if you painted everybody in your home
> country with one brush until they were supposed to overthrew the
> telephone company or whatever?

It's not a moral judgment, it's a practical one. It's not the fault of an
individual resident of Taiwan that their country has a high noise to signal
ratio; then again, a rabid dog isn't at fault for its condition, but I'm not
gonna get close enough for it to bite me.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
"...Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
safely in one pretty and well-preserved piece, but to slide across the
finish line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, and
shouting GERONIMO!!!" -- Bill McKenna


ned at unixmail

Jan 26, 2010, 12:16 AM

Post #5 of 56 (1390 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Michael Mansour wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Fellows, I have the highest spam score vs. all my buddies:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
>>
>> It's all because
>> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header1.cf
>> header SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Received =~
>> /\bdynamic.hinet\.(?:com|net|org|info)/ describe
>
> I personally don't understand how this regex does all of Taiwan, all I can see
> it do is hit the dynamic IP's of the hinet ISP, which to me is valid since
> dynamic IP's really shouldn't be sending bulk mail.
>

Indeed. If your domain (jidanni.org) is in fact on a static IP then you
need to get your ISP to update the PTR record to reflect this. The issue
arises solely because a rDNS lookup of your IP resolves to
218-163-3-226.dynamic.hinet.net rather than, for example, mx.jidanni.org.

Still, a score of 1.666 from a non-standard ruleset shouldn't hurt you
too much if you're not sending spam and are otherwise following good
email practices.


maillists at conactive

Jan 26, 2010, 2:31 AM

Post #6 of 56 (1375 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


maillists at conactive

Jan 26, 2010, 2:31 AM

Post #7 of 56 (1376 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Ned Slider wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:47 +0000:

> Indeed. If your domain (jidanni.org) is in fact on a static IP then you
> need to get your ISP to update the PTR record to reflect this.

Well, on closer look it appears that he's using a smarthost. So, there's
no need for another rDNS for him. He's just a normal dynamic customer
sending mail thru a smarthost and being a hinet customer.

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


wtogami at redhat

Jan 26, 2010, 3:15 AM

Post #8 of 56 (1376 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

On 01/26/2010 05:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
>
> Kai
>

Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?

Warren


scheidell at secnap

Jan 26, 2010, 3:56 AM

Post #9 of 56 (1379 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

On 1/26/10 5:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:47 +0000:
>
>
>> Indeed. If your domain (jidanni.org) is in fact on a static IP then you
>> need to get your ISP to update the PTR record to reflect this.
>>
> Well, on closer look it appears that he's using a smarthost. So, there's
> no need for another rDNS for him. He's just a normal dynamic customer
> sending mail thru a smarthost and being a hinet customer.
>
>
which in itself has a bunged up RDNS .

Received: from [208.97.132.207] (HELO homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.207)


host 208.97.132.207
207.132.97.208.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer caiajhbdccah.dreamhost.com.
if you don't follow the RFC's, you have no reason to complain if people
who DO follow the RFC's block your email.

> Kai
>
>


--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________


maillists at conactive

Jan 26, 2010, 3:57 AM

Post #10 of 56 (1375 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Warren Togami wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:15:23 -0500:

> Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?

Isn't that a given? The point was that I don't see a reason to ask here
about this. It's deprecated and it's not part of SA.

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


maillists at conactive

Jan 26, 2010, 4:07 AM

Post #11 of 56 (1376 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Michael Scheidell wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:56:04 -0500:

> if you don't follow the RFC's, you have no reason to complain if people
> who DO follow the RFC's block your email.

There is no RFC requiring back and forward resolution to match. I think
there's not even a requirement for an rDNS, it's just good practice. And
it's not the point of discussion here, anyway.
The point of discussion was "Email passed through apparent spammer domain"
because of *origination* at a dynamic hinet address. I personally think
this rule is misguided and maybe isn't even doing what it was intended to
do. Anyway, anyone with a sane mind has stopped using most SA rules two
years ago.

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


jdow at earthlink

Jan 26, 2010, 7:05 PM

Post #12 of 56 (1348 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Surely you jest, Sir.

{o.o}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Warren Togami" <wtogami [at] redhat>
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/January/26 03:15


> On 01/26/2010 05:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.
>>
>> Kai
>>
>
> Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
>
> Warren
>


jdow at earthlink

Jan 26, 2010, 7:07 PM

Post #13 of 56 (1348 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

From: "Kai Schaetzl" <maillists [at] conactive>
Sent: Tuesday, 2010/January/26 03:57


> Warren Togami wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:15:23 -0500:
>
>> Huh? Aren't we supposed to be telling people to stop using SARE?
>
> Isn't that a given? The point was that I don't see a reason to ask here
> about this. It's deprecated and it's not part of SA.
>
> Kai

And it has this disgraceful habit. It works.

{^_^}


jidanni at jidanni

Jan 26, 2010, 10:12 PM

Post #14 of 56 (1347 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
HINET: Control of approx 8,476,149 IP addresses http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/3/AS3462.htm
user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?

But that's what I did, as you see from
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw
headers.

But that's still not good enough.

So what next? Need a ssh tunnel to /usr/lib/sendmail or something on a
US machine to eradicate all traces of Taiwan?

>>>>> "KS" == Kai Schaetzl <maillists [at] conactive> writes:
KS> The point of discussion was "Email passed through apparent spammer domain"
KS> because of *origination* at a dynamic hinet address. I personally think
KS> this rule is misguided and maybe isn't even doing what it was intended to do.


maillists at conactive

Jan 27, 2010, 3:31 AM

Post #15 of 56 (1337 views)
Permalink
Re: painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Jdow wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:07:14 -0800:

> And it has this disgraceful habit. It works.

You are special, anyway.

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


maillists at conactive

Jan 27, 2010, 3:31 AM

Post #16 of 56 (1337 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Jidanni [at] jidanni wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:11 +0800:

> So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
> HINET: Control of approx 8,476,149 IP addresses http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/3/AS3462.htm
> user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?

I told you what you can do.

Apart from that, again:
SARE is not part of SA.
SARE is deprecated.
So, why bother?

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


uhlar at fantomas

Jan 27, 2010, 6:10 AM

Post #17 of 56 (1331 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

> Jidanni [at] jidanni wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:12:11 +0800:
> > So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
> > HINET: Control of approx 8,476,149 IP addresses http://www.fixedorbit.com/AS/3/AS3462.htm
> > user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?

On 27.01.10 12:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> I told you what you can do.
>
> Apart from that, again:
> SARE is not part of SA.
> SARE is deprecated.
> So, why bother?

because his mail can be tagged as spam?
There are still some sare rules published and people who may use them.
I guess some of SARE people are subscribed here and someone could notice this
problem and remove it...

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar [at] fantomas ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...


maillists at conactive

Jan 27, 2010, 6:25 AM

Post #18 of 56 (1331 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:10:48 +0100:

> because his mail can be tagged as spam?

Not largely a problem. Did you look at the mailing list conversation he linked
to? It seems he's actively telling the mailing list owner how to tune SA and
reduce the required score to 2 (two !). And before that he may have told him to
use SARE (I don't know, but it's possible). And that is why he came here. He
set his own trap and is now likely to fall in. :-) And he's probably never
heard about setting own rule scores.

> I guess some of SARE people are subscribed here and someone could notice this
> problem and remove it...

quoting myself:

> I told you (him) what you (he) can do.

> This is an SARE rule, I suggest you ask there.

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


cgregory at hwcn

Jan 27, 2010, 7:07 AM

Post #19 of 56 (1330 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> So what should a Taiwan user (Taiwan~=Hinet)
>> user do. Buy a SMTP account with a US Company?
> I told you what you can do.
> Apart from that, again:
> SARE is not part of SA.
> SARE is deprecated.
> So, why bother?

Why bother posting just to tell him that his fate rests in the hands of
everyone else? That was his complaint in the first place. If you (Kai)
want to mount a campaign to have SARE removed from everyone's SA configs,
then best of luck to you, but otherwise, your 'answer' does not help the
legitimate Taiwanese user in the least.... (shrug)

- C


maillists at conactive

Jan 27, 2010, 8:31 AM

Post #20 of 56 (1330 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

so what?

Kai

--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com


jidanni at jidanni

Jan 27, 2010, 5:34 PM

Post #21 of 56 (1310 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Long ago, I tried mailing directly direct-to-mx style, but that of
course didn't work, e.g., http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL109625
So only 5% of my mail got through.

So then I tried mailing through The ISP Here, Hinet.Net's SMTP server,
but of course Hinet.Net has a bad name. So only 50% of my mail got through.

So, upon people like you guy's recommendation, I (asked my mom to buy)
me a dreamhost.com account.

However I can't shake off the Original Sin of Being in Taiwan. All
people with Taiwan Colored Skin will have points deducted, no matter
what. We use the Telephone Company's ISP.

>>>>> "J" == Jailer-Daemon <bofh [at] connect> writes:
J> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:30:28AM -0500, <msherman [at] projectile> wrote:
>>
>> He's using an SMTP relay

J> He is, but it isn't a Hinet relay. At least not in the URL he gave.
J> It should be possible to relay out from your own ISP and not score
J> anything on SARE rules, without having to pay extra for "clean" SMTP
J> relaying (which is what seems to be happening here).

Now you guys are saying I should go back to using Hinet.Net's SMTP, even
though my mom has already paid a 5 year contract for me at Dreamhost.

>> The rule is buggy -- it's looking at all the
>> received headers, even the ones before the relay.

Yes, and what may seem like a mere 1.6 points is causing me to have to
request the whole spam threshold of that mailing list
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw be
lowered just for me, just because my mail is being tagged with a stupid
looking "mail Made in Taiwan, penalty 1.666 points" that I can't do
anything about, thanks to you guys and no one else.

Also, I wonder why lots of my mail doesn't seem to get through to
people... and no, I don't want to bother them with various test
messages. Perhaps it is all again due to your sloppy rules?

Actually, I could figure out some underhanded methods to get around
being detected as living in a Undesirable Country, but if ever detected,
I would surely get penalized even more points.


mic at npgx

Jan 27, 2010, 6:08 PM

Post #22 of 56 (1312 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Hi Jidanni,

> Long ago, I tried mailing directly direct-to-mx style, but that of
> course didn't work, e.g., http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL109625
> So only 5% of my mail got through.
>
> So then I tried mailing through The ISP Here, Hinet.Net's SMTP
> server, but of course Hinet.Net has a bad name. So only 50% of my
> mail got through.
>
> So, upon people like you guy's recommendation, I (asked my mom to
> buy) me a dreamhost.com account.
>
> However I can't shake off the Original Sin of Being in Taiwan. All
> people with Taiwan Colored Skin will have points deducted, no matter
> what. We use the Telephone Company's ISP.
>
> >>>>> "J" == Jailer-Daemon <bofh [at] connect> writes:
>
> J> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:30:28AM -0500,
> <msherman [at] projectile> wrote:
> >>
> >> He's using an SMTP relay
>
> J> He is, but it isn't a Hinet relay. At least not in the URL he
> gave. J> It should be possible to relay out from your own ISP and
> not score J> anything on SARE rules, without having to pay extra for
> "clean" SMTP J> relaying (which is what seems to be happening here).
>
> Now you guys are saying I should go back to using Hinet.Net's SMTP, even
> though my mom has already paid a 5 year contract for me at Dreamhost.

There are various people on this list from various countries, not everyone was
giving the same recommendation.

> >> The rule is buggy -- it's looking at all the
> >> received headers, even the ones before the relay.
>
> Yes, and what may seem like a mere 1.6 points is causing me to have
> to request the whole spam threshold of that mailing list
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2850/raw be
> lowered just for me, just because my mail is being tagged with a stupid
> looking "mail Made in Taiwan, penalty 1.666 points" that I can't do
> anything about, thanks to you guys and no one else.

Why couldn't the mailing list filters simply whitelist your email address or
whitelist people automatically subscribed to the mailing list?

> Also, I wonder why lots of my mail doesn't seem to get through to
> people... and no, I don't want to bother them with various test
> messages. Perhaps it is all again due to your sloppy rules?

The world isn't perfect and the only way to get things changed is to complaint
and/or do something about it yourself. But to blanket criticise rules that
many sites are using worldwide doesn't really make sense to me.

It may not be your fault you're using an ISP which is known to generate spam
and/or have lax rules in combating spam from it's users, but if you know the
problems with the ISP and you continue to use them then how can you complain
here? you need to complain to the ISP.

> Actually, I could figure out some underhanded methods to get around
> being detected as living in a Undesirable Country, but if ever
> detected, I would surely get penalized even more points.

Two wrongs never make a right, try it and you'll learn that :)

Regards,

Michael.


jidanni at jidanni

Jan 27, 2010, 6:35 PM

Post #23 of 56 (1303 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

>>>>> "MM" == Michael Mansour <mic [at] npgx> writes:
MM> Why couldn't the mailing list filters simply whitelist your email address or
MM> whitelist people automatically subscribed to the mailing list?
Yes, but that's beside the point. That is not solving the bad thing
you guys are doing.

MM> The world isn't perfect and the only way to get things changed is to complaint
MM> and/or do something about it yourself. But to blanket criticise rules that
MM> many sites are using worldwide doesn't really make sense to me.

You guys are doing something wrong. Maybe you think that every country
is like the USA or something. You blew it. Your rules are wrong.

MM> It may not be your fault you're using an ISP which is known to generate spam
MM> and/or have lax rules in combating spam from it's users, but if you know the
MM> problems with the ISP and you continue to use them then how can you complain
MM> here? you need to complain to the ISP.

Yes I am using the wires of that Telephone Company. But at the first
chance my mail gets, it leaves those wires and heads for the smarthost
in the USA in order to cleanse its sins of having come from an
unfamiliar country. But for you guys, once you are a Negro you are
always a Negro or something. Please fix your rules. You are demanding
one use certain physical carriers irrespective of ISP.

I'm not using the ISP to send SMTP.


mic at npgx

Jan 27, 2010, 7:09 PM

Post #24 of 56 (1302 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

Hi Jadinni,

> >>>>> "MM" == Michael Mansour <mic [at] npgx> writes:
> MM> Why couldn't the mailing list filters simply whitelist your
> email address or MM> whitelist people automatically subscribed to
> the mailing list? Yes, but that's beside the point. That is not
> solving the bad thing you guys are doing.

?? I'm a user just like you are.

> MM> The world isn't perfect and the only way to get things changed
> is to complaint MM> and/or do something about it yourself. But to
> blanket criticise rules that MM> many sites are using worldwide
> doesn't really make sense to me.
>
> You guys are doing something wrong. Maybe you think that every
> country is like the USA or something. You blew it. Your rules are wrong.

I'm not in the USA, I'm in Australia. Our laws are some of the strictest in
the world and our ISP's take action on users within their networks that spam.

I didn't write the rules, I'm just a user of them.

> MM> It may not be your fault you're using an ISP which is known to
> generate spam MM> and/or have lax rules in combating spam from it's
> users, but if you know the MM> problems with the ISP and you
> continue to use them then how can you complain MM> here? you need to
> complain to the ISP.
>
> Yes I am using the wires of that Telephone Company. But at the first
> chance my mail gets, it leaves those wires and heads for the
> smarthost in the USA in order to cleanse its sins of having come
> from an unfamiliar country. But for you guys, once you are a Negro
> you are always a Negro or something. Please fix your rules. You are demanding
> one use certain physical carriers irrespective of ISP.

Hmmm...

Michael.

> I'm not using the ISP to send SMTP.
> _______________________________________________
> This is being sent to: mic [at] npgx
> Sare-users mailing list
> Sare-users [at] maddoc
> http://lists.maddoc.net/mailman/listinfo/sare-users
------- End of Original Message -------


noel.butler at ausics

Jan 27, 2010, 7:30 PM

Post #25 of 56 (1303 views)
Permalink
Re: [Sare-users] painting everybody in Taiwan with the same brush [In reply to]

On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 10:35 +0800, jidanni [at] jidanni wrote:


> Yes, but that's beside the point. That is not solving the bad thing
> you guys are doing.



Eh? stopping spammers is a bad thing now hey...


> MM> The world isn't perfect and the only way to get things changed is to complaint
> MM> and/or do something about it yourself. But to blanket criticise rules that
> MM> many sites are using worldwide doesn't really make sense to me.
>
> You guys are doing something wrong. Maybe you think that every country
> is like the USA or something. You blew it. Your rules are wrong.



oh right we bad, bad bad bad, how DARE we put measures in place to stop
spamming scum


>
> Yes I am using the wires of that Telephone Company. But at the first
> chance my mail gets, it leaves those wires and heads for the smarthost
> in the USA in order to cleanse its sins of having come from an
> unfamiliar country. But for you guys, once you are a Negro you are
> always a Negro or something. Please fix your rules. You are demanding
> one use certain physical carriers irrespective of ISP.


what racist rot.

I too are not an American (NEWSFLASH: like at least half or more of this
list). a person can not change the colour of their skin (WOW about the
only thing you said that did not make me piss myself in laughter)
however a country that does not care about its residents spamming CAN
change, yet TW has failed to do so. Even China has in recent years
taken great steps to clean up their act, if you want change, it must
start at the top, petition your government to get off its lazy ass and
do something about its spamming residents, clean up their act, and in
time to come TW, like CN has recently found, many places just might once
again start accepting your mail.

Don't you dare sit there having a childish dummy spit accusing everyone
here to be wrong by denying access or adding a substantial score to a
well known spammer friendly country.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All SpamAssassin users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.