
cgregory at hwcn
Nov 24, 2009, 9:52 AM
Post #1 of 1
(339 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: [sa] Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again
|
|
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, John Hardin wrote: > Granted, but in metas such a test can be useful: > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FTO_NO&srcpath=jhardin Every now and then, someone posts a link like this one, and I find myself looking at a kind of 'index' page that frankly doesn't mean a thing to me. Rather than being a direct link to an actual rule or meta, I have to *guess* which link/section to click on to find what you intended to have us see as an example? I see statistics about a rule named TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP but no indication of what those rules ARE. Am I missing something here? - Charles
|