Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: users

SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

tonio at starbridge

Sep 30, 2009, 2:23 PM

Post #1 of 8 (532 views)
Permalink

SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
compiled rules.

sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted.
But some body rules are now not detected.

exemple of simple body rule (for testing):

body TONIO_SPAM_TEST /toniospam/i
describe TONIO_SPAM_TEST Mentions Generic toniospamtest
score TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5

if i commented out
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
in v320.pre, body rules is working again.

I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active.
I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result.

Some info on my environnement:
debian testing
perl v5.10.0
xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package)
re2c version 0.13.5-1

Thanks for your help
Regards
Tonio

NB: sorry for this second post, but i've made a mistake with the
previous one (replying to an other thread)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrDzE4ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOIgCeIgXvgz5VafWgZmeb7RhS3vvo
7ZUAn0+ANE9/uzBbSTcCsn26PGVHlflt
=sq17
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

zdenek.herman at ille

Oct 1, 2009, 2:12 AM

Post #2 of 8 (504 views)
Permalink

Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile [In reply to]

I have same problem.
Any solution ?

Regards

Zdenek Herman
zdenek.herman [at] ille
tel: 777 730 218
http://www.cistaposta.cz

tonio [at] starbridge napsal(a):
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
> compiled rules.
>
> sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted.
> But some body rules are now not detected.
>
> exemple of simple body rule (for testing):
>
> body TONIO_SPAM_TEST /toniospam/i
> describe TONIO_SPAM_TEST Mentions Generic toniospamtest
> score TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5
>
> if i commented out
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
> in v320.pre, body rules is working again.
>
> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active.
> I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result.
>
> Some info on my environnement:
> debian testing
> perl v5.10.0
> xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package)
> re2c version 0.13.5-1
>
> Thanks for your help
> Regards
> Tonio
>
> NB: sorry for this second post, but i've made a mistake with the
> previous one (replying to an other thread)
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrDzE4ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOIgCeIgXvgz5VafWgZmeb7RhS3vvo
> 7ZUAn0+ANE9/uzBbSTcCsn26PGVHlflt
> =sq17
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>

jhardin at impsec

Oct 1, 2009, 8:15 AM

Post #3 of 8 (504 views)
Permalink

Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile [In reply to]

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote:

> I have same problem.
> Any solution ?
>
> tonio [at] starbridge napsal(a):
>
>> i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
>> compiled rules.
>>
>> sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when
>> restarted. But some body rules are now not detected.

A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen
earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on,
publish the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver
somewhere, and post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined.

--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin [at] impsec FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin [at] impsec
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Therapeutic Phrenologist - send email for affordable rate schedule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximately 9051420 firearms legally purchased in the U.S. this year

jm at jmason

Oct 1, 2009, 8:27 AM

Post #4 of 8 (514 views)
Permalink

Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile [In reply to]

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:15, John Hardin <jhardin [at] impsec> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote:
>
>> I have same problem.
>> Any solution ?
>>
>> tonio [at] starbridge napsal(a):
>>
>>> i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
>>> compiled rules.
>>>
>>> sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when
>>> restarted. But some body rules are now not detected.
>
> A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen
> earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on, publish
> the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and
> post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined.

even better: open a Bugzilla entry and do the same. That's how we
track (possible) bugs and prioritize them.

--
--j.

jhardin at impsec

Oct 1, 2009, 8:57 AM

Post #5 of 8 (499 views)
Permalink

Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile [In reply to]

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Justin Mason wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:15, John Hardin <jhardin [at] impsec> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote:
>>
>>> I have same problem.
>>> Any solution ?
>>>
>>> tonio [at] starbridge napsal(a):
>>>
>>>> i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
>>>> compiled rules.
>>>>
>>>> sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when
>>>> restarted. But some body rules are now not detected.
>>
>> A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen
>> earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on, publish
>> the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and
>> post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined.
>
> even better: open a Bugzilla entry and do the same. That's how we
> track (possible) bugs and prioritize them.

And the bugzilla entry could have the logs as attachments. I wasn't sure
if it was appropriate to open a bug yet, but if Justin suggests it then I
guess it is...

--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin [at] impsec FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin [at] impsec
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Therapeutic Phrenologist - send email for affordable rate schedule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximately 9051420 firearms legally purchased in the U.S. this year

tonio at starbridge

Oct 1, 2009, 9:09 AM

Post #6 of 8 (496 views)
Permalink

Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Justin Mason a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 16:15, John Hardin <jhardin [at] impsec> wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Zdenek Herman wrote:
>>
>>> I have same problem.
>>> Any solution ?
>>>
>>> tonio [at] starbridge napsal(a):
>>>
>>>> i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
>>>> compiled rules.
>>>>
>>>> sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when
>>>> restarted. But some body rules are now not detected.
>> A suggestion to both of you, based on sa-compile support requests seen
>> earlier on the list: run sa-compile with the debug option turned on,
publish
>> the debugging output and intermediate files on a webserver somewhere, and
>> post the URIs for that info here so they can be examined.
>
> even better: open a Bugzilla entry and do the same. That's how we
> track (possible) bugs and prioritize them.
>
thank for your answers.
It's done:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrE1EEACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINOJgCdG7Piu3Phd1Mb2iYl7dmX1pV7
b0UAn1yITwVbWgddDiUlJtdQgCWsb4QL
=mPa4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

me at junc

Oct 1, 2009, 9:42 AM

Post #7 of 8 (518 views)
Permalink

Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile [In reply to]

On tor 01 okt 2009 18:09:38 CEST, "tonio [at] starbridge" wrote
> thank for your answers.
> It's done:
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214

also

spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t msg > output.log
and another time with the plugin disabled shows it work (this time
with >>output.log)

add output.log to the ticket

--
xpoint

tonio at starbridge

Oct 2, 2009, 1:03 AM

Post #8 of 8 (498 views)
Permalink

Re: SA 3.3.0 and sa-compile [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On tor 01 okt 2009 18:09:38 CEST, "tonio [at] starbridge" wrote
>> thank for your answers. It's done:
>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6214
>
> also
>
> spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t msg > output.log and another time with the
> plugin disabled shows it work (this time with >>output.log)
>
> add output.log to the ticket
>
it's done

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkrFs78ACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIN86QCglgcJCF0r26lWKxWFoosEOT6h
qAIAn0B6yUq01LaXSI3RpsbEJDqqZwWb
=NKGw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads