Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 19:35:07 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi, > I am seeing (past 4-5 days) more spam generally slipping under my scoring settings, but > in particular ED image spam with the word 'viagra' sp 24 Nov 2009 16:28:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144506 From: "Jeff Mincy" <jeff@delphioutpost.com> Sent: Tuesday, 2009/November/24 14:23 > From: LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> > Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 1 24 Nov 2009 15:55:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144504 that's normal. can be ignored On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 21:04, Yet Another Ninja <sa-list@alexb.ch> wrote: > When running masscheck calling: > > /hom 24 Nov 2009 15:16:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144503 From: LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:08:11 -0700 On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk> 24 Nov 2009 14:23:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144502 When running masscheck calling: /home/mc/masscheck/spamassassin/trunk/masses && nice ./mass-check \ --cf='loadplugin Dumptext plugins/Dumptext.pm' 24 Nov 2009 13:04:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144501 On 11/24/2009 7:10 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On tir 24 nov 2009 19:02:29 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote >> seems simpler than adding 100000000 domains 24 Nov 2009 11:04:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144500 On tir 24 nov 2009 19:02:29 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote > seems simpler than adding 100000000 domains to freemail's config .-) that why i like to ch 24 Nov 2009 10:10:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144498 On 11/24/2009 6:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On tir 24 nov 2009 18:30:15 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote >> Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well with 24 Nov 2009 10:02:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144497 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, John Hardin wrote: > Granted, but in metas such a test can be useful: > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2FTO_NO&srcpath=jha 24 Nov 2009 09:52:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144496 On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:22 -0800, R-Elists wrote: > didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an > extra factor of protec 24 Nov 2009 09:49:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144495 Hi, > Obviously every admin has to decide what to block and not > to block, but I just wanted to add a data point. I try > not to block stuff my user 24 Nov 2009 09:46:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144494 John Tice wrote: > I am seeing (past 4-5 days) more spam generally slipping under my scoring settings, but in particular ED image spam with the word ' 24 Nov 2009 09:46:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144493 I am seeing (past 4-5 days) more spam generally slipping under my scoring settings, but in particular ED image spam with the word 'viagra' spelled cor 24 Nov 2009 09:41:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144492 On tir 24 nov 2009 18:30:15 CET, Yet Another Ninja wrote > Freemail.pm plugin does it pretty well without the overhead and > cron'd replication lag. 24 Nov 2009 09:34:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144491 On tir 24 nov 2009 18:22:25 CET, R-Elists wrote > didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an > extra factor of protectio 24 Nov 2009 09:30:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144490 On 11/24/2009 6:22 PM, R-Elists wrote: > didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an > extra factor of protection to cont 24 Nov 2009 09:30:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144489 Matt Garretson wrote: > FWIW, a good number of those in your list I'm pretty sure > are legit opt-in "newsletters" (term used loosely... they > mainl 24 Nov 2009 09:25:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144488 didnt anyone think that the emailBL project was good enough in adding an extra factor of protection to continue development? - rh 24 Nov 2009 09:22:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144487 Daniel J McDonald wrote: > Although these don't all appear to be business related, very few would > be marked as spam without the HABEAS_ACCREDITED bo 24 Nov 2009 09:20:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144486 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Mark Hedges wrote: > OMG I am SO DUMB - I had skip_rbl_checks set in my personal > userconf. DUH. (nod) Thanks for posting the 24 Nov 2009 07:44:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144477 On 24-Nov-2009, at 01:17, Hajdú Zoltán wrote: > forces them to provide unsubscription options in their advertising messages, etc. If there wasnt an 24 Nov 2009 03:08:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144475 Hi folks, > >> Unless there are objections, I'm going to add two tests to my sandbox: > >> > >> RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM, a new (to us) DNSBL populated by th 24 Nov 2009 01:59:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144470 On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:17 +0100, Hajdú Zoltán wrote: > Habeas (nowdays ReturnPath) certifies their clients, forces them to provide unsubscription 24 Nov 2009 01:48:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144469 Habeas (nowdays ReturnPath) certifies their clients, forces them to provide unsubscription options in their advertising messages, etc. If there wasnt 24 Nov 2009 00:17:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144466 On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:08 -0700, LuKreme wrote: > On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk> > wrote: > > > Yes, why to 23 Nov 2009 23:58:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144465