<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SpamAssassin | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 23:58:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>how do I fix my spamassassin setup? I can&amp;#039;t use Bayes anymore -- won&amp;#039;t open the files...</title>
<description>Ishtar:law/bin&amp;gt; process_despam -f Feb 10 20:01:20.916 [3573] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all Feb 10 20:01:20.916 [3573] dbg: logger: logging leve</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 20:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170808</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF and DKIM tests by default?</title>
<description>Hello, I have a server where I never customized any of the SA rules/tests (SA v.3.3.1).  The server does run sa-update every day.  Is this the right</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 20:06:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170776</link>
</item><item>
<title>Getting high spam score for email server hosted on AWS instance</title>
<description>Hi, I have a mail server setup on an AWS instance. When I am sending mails via this setup to a test spamassassin setup that acts as an email receive</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 03:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170763</link>
</item><item>
<title>Ham hitting too generic rule</title>
<description>We have a customer who is a legitimate non-spamming investment advisor. Their outbound disclaimer has the phrase &amp;quot;investment advice&amp;quot; which hits the ru</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 14:12:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170751</link>
</item><item>
<title>T_FROM_MISSPACED score</title>
<description>Hi, Is there a reason T_FROM_MISSPACED is still only a testing rule? It seems to trigger on quite a few spams and phishing attacks and hardly any ha</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 11:31:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170749</link>
</item><item>
<title>User Preferences on SQL with Amavis, in Multi-Server Environment</title>
<description>Hi all Spamassassin version: 3.3.0 OS: Debian Lenny SA called by Amavis through its command, so NOT using spamc/spamd. I&amp;#039;ve two separate servers: On</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 05:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170743</link>
</item><item>
<title>Spamassassin 3.3.2 for Ubuntu LTS</title>
<description>Hi, does anyone know where I can find spamassassin 3.3.2 in deb format for Ubuntu 10.04? Thanks -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS -&amp;gt; http://www.linux.it</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 01:58:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170741</link>
</item><item>
<title>Lots of comment in mail, how to score</title>
<description>I seem to remember we discussed a way to figure out how much HTML comment is in a message, but I am not able to find a decent ruleset that is trying t</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 07:12:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170728</link>
</item><item>
<title>ACL vs. TRANSPORT styles</title>
<description>Hello SpamAssassin users, Does anyone out there have any information regarding two purported &amp;quot;styles&amp;quot; for SpamAssassin operation - ACL and TRANSPORT?</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 11:53:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170708</link>
</item><item>
<title>Partial solution (Re: Burst of large messages sometimes causes spamd to lock up)</title>
<description>Kris Deugau wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve adjusted one machine with min-spare and max-spare at 5, the other &amp;gt; min-spare 2 and max-spare 5; but I don&amp;#039;t think that&amp;#039;s it</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 10:44:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170706</link>
</item><item>
<title>warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, no value provided for &amp;quot;body&amp;quot;, skipping: body</title>
<description>Hi,   I have an error somewhere in a rule (not that I have added one for ages so I cannot fathom how it slipped in). The error message from -D --l</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 02:00:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170702</link>
</item><item>
<title>blacklist_from exceptions</title>
<description>Hi list, Is there any way to block an entire domain, except for a particular recipient? Example: blacklist_from @orig.com except when rcpt_to is myb</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 10:51:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170694</link>
</item><item>
<title>explanation of rule</title>
<description>Good afternoon List. Could anyone elaborate on the following rule. I have tried searching for an explanation, without success. TVD_SPACE_RATIO_MINFP</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 03:29:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170690</link>
</item><item>
<title>Global and per-user bayes in sql</title>
<description>Hello  Is it posible to use global &amp;amp; per-user bayes in sql? The intented usage should be the following  mail&amp;lt;---&amp;gt;spamassassin&amp;lt;---&amp;gt;generic_rules&amp;lt;---</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 01:04:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170688</link>
</item><item>
<title>Spamassassin rules from sql</title>
<description>Hi! I&amp;#039;m just wondering, is there a limitation on the type of rules that can be added to the SpamassAssin rules table? Because adding something like</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 08:37:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170669</link>
</item><item>
<title>wildcard http match</title>
<description>Good morning list.    Please forgive me my ignorance.   The 2.5 hour drive to work has drained any remaining intelligence.   As such, I cann</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 00:40:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170630</link>
</item><item>
<title>Burst of large messages sometimes causes spamd to lock up</title>
<description>Every so often, one of our spamd instances gets locked up when a burst of messages with &amp;quot;lots&amp;quot; (150-200K+) of body text gets passed in. If we catch</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 10:56:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170607</link>
</item><item>
<title>MSN again</title>
<description>Good morning List. Has anyone noticed a mass increase of spam mails from the hotmail.com servers? In the last hour, these are our top 10 incoming s</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 23:02:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170600</link>
</item><item>
<title>introducing body J_MAILBOX_FULL</title>
<description>body J_MAILBOX_FULL /^Your? ((web|E-?) ?mail|mailbox) .*(is|has) .*(exceed|over)/i Got to update it every day to stop those bast*rds.</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 06:56:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170594</link>
</item><item>
<title>ham marked as spam: bogus IP in report</title>
<description>Hi, recently, my spamassassin started to score system messages as spam, mentioning IP numbers not in the email:  Return-Path: &amp;lt;xxx@w1.oeko.net&amp;gt; Del</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 08:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170560</link>
</item><item>
<title>URIBL blocked</title>
<description>Good afternoon list.   Please could someone explain the following   0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED     ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to    URIBL was</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 04:22:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170552</link>
</item><item>
<title>Identifying actual performance on rules</title>
<description>I am trying to locate reason for performance spikes. I have read the various wiki pages, and they suggest solutions but not a way to identify the bot</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2012 13:49:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170546</link>
</item><item>
<title>SpamAssassin for Windows 1.2</title>
<description>Hi there, While Kevin is making progress towards 3.4, I had some time to spare to update &amp;#039;SpamAssassin for Windows&amp;#039; to the current Apache release 3.</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2012 00:57:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170516</link>
</item><item>
<title>ERROR: LINT FAILED, suppressing output: rules/70_sandbox.cf</title>
<description>Seen upon SVN update: lint: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in &amp;quot;rules/70_sandbox.cf&amp;quot;: mimeheader   __KAM_BLOCK_UTF7_2   Content-Type =~</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 15:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170513</link>
</item><item>
<title>update channel list</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve had the following channel list for a while: updates.spamassassin.org sought.rules.yerp.org khop-bl.sa.khopesh.com khop-blessed.sa.khopesh.com kh</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 08:14:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170471</link>
</item><item>
<title>Recently inherited a mail gateway, need some assistance</title>
<description>We recently had an employee leave who maintained our mail gateway, which has now been pushed on to me. Very little instructions were left, but I need</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 09:02:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170445</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [users@httpd] Basic Auth Authentication Wonkiness with scripts or Static HTML not protected by Basic Auth accessing resources protected by Basic Auth In when using Apache &amp;amp; Internet Explorer</title>
<description>re: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/auth.html#possibleproblems &amp;gt; I just wanted to point the following: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Because of the way that Basic authe</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 16:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170416</link>
</item><item>
<title>SA 3.0.2 buggie? -- message that DB file doesn&amp;#039;t exist -- but systrace shows successful lock and open!</title>
<description>This is not permission problem -- Message I get: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/lw_spam/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: bayes: cann</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 06:36:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170411</link>
</item><item>
<title>FreeBSD port ja-p5-Mail-SpamAssassin needs adoption</title>
<description>FreeBSD is committed to keeping the most up to date, current versions of all major software packages and utilities. We need your help in doing this.</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2012 08:26:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170401</link>
</item><item>
<title>Yahoo groups big5 subscribe spam</title>
<description>Hi all, I wonder if anyone has encountered spam like this recently? http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=3ByuaFva It&amp;#039;s a base64-encoded subscribe request</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2012 18:15:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170396</link>
</item><item>
<title>[OT] RBLs</title>
<description>Hi,  we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the community for recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings. We are</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 03:28:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170366</link>
</item><item>
<title>Spam from google photos ?</title>
<description>These are the headers http://pastebin.com/udbDgJ8L  Seems to have come from google , but is spam. I cant even read the language :)</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 00:06:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170361</link>
</item><item>
<title>sa-update channel list</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m using SpamAssassin for years now to get rid of spam. Now I wonder which sa-update channels you&amp;#039;re using by default to improve your scan res</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 10:33:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170341</link>
</item><item>
<title>rule to test &amp;quot;body&amp;quot; length?</title>
<description>Is there a way to check if the body of an email is less than some threshold (length of chars)? I&amp;#039;m seeing some spam slip through because it&amp;#039;s purpose</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2012 06:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170298</link>
</item><item>
<title>shouldn&amp;#039;t SA treat certain web-script headers as X-Spam-Relays-External?</title>
<description>Hi there I just had the following phishing attacks get through with scores in the 2s. http://pastebin.com/4Yyc0m7j http://pastebin.com/R0XMM9Je Bot</description>
<pubDate>05 Jan  2012 21:06:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170288</link>
</item><item>
<title>razor2 and cloudmark?</title>
<description>I am testing the Razor2 plugin and am surprised that some &amp;quot;obvious&amp;quot; spam is getting through. The reason I&amp;#039;m most surprised is that the SA install (3.</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 16:40:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170258</link>
</item><item>
<title>SPF tests and authenticated SMTP</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m running a brand new installation of SA 3.3.2 with the Milter on FreeBSD 8.2. Everything is going smoothly, for the most part (there seems to be o</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 12:51:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170248</link>
</item><item>
<title>Help tagging URL spam</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m having difficulty catching a series of spams with just a text component and a URL and hoped someone could help. I&amp;#039;ve included a few samples o</description>
<pubDate>01 Jan  2012 15:59:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170195</link>
</item><item>
<title>sa-update / perl error again</title>
<description>Hi, Running CentOS5 with SpamAssassin v3.3.1-2.el5 installed via yum I remember getting this error a while ago, and it was fixed (don&amp;#039;t remember how</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 19:46:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170179</link>
</item><item>
<title>installation problem</title>
<description>Hi, I just tried to install spamassassin: everything proceeded normally, AFAIK, but the basic &amp;quot;spamassassin -t&amp;#039; on the provided sample fails because n</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 10:41:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170172</link>
</item><item>
<title>Meta-Meta-Rules (was Re: &amp;quot;meta&amp;quot; rule using wildcard to include other rules?)</title>
<description>On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:34:57 -0800 (PST) John Hardin &amp;lt;jhardin@impsec.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; If you&amp;#039;re doing this regularly I&amp;#039;d suggest writing a small shell &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 08:38:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170161</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;quot;meta&amp;quot; rule using wildcard to include other rules?</title>
<description>Hi, I have a series of local rules customized to catch spam targeted at my (very small, family-only) user base. I have a series of rules along the li</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 07:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170156</link>
</item><item>
<title>RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP address range change needed?</title>
<description>Hi I get mail from 2.100.0.99 that&amp;#039;s sent via Yahoo and delivered via Fasthosts, who use SA - headers below. The sender IP gets it a score of 3.2 RCV</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 00:54:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170152</link>
</item><item>
<title>URIBL_DBL_REDIR</title>
<description>Hi List, I noticed the recent addition of URIBL_DBL_REDIR hitting on a few spams: 25_uribl.cf:urirhssub    URIBL_DBL_REDIR dbl.spamhaus.org.</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 08:51:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170123</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile pkg-plist ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/files patch-bug6698</title>
<description>this patch of the patch fixes the case where X-DCC headers are injected by the upstream mail provider. SpamAssassin bugzilla has been updated also.</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 10:46:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170091</link>
</item><item>
<title>Somewhat OT: Security (was Re: Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?)</title>
<description>On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:35:46 +0000 Martin Hepworth &amp;lt;maxsec@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Using ie ??? Recommend firefox or chrome much faster and less prone to</description>
<pubDate>25 Dec  2011 11:02:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170083</link>
</item><item>
<title>DNSWL was re-enabled</title>
<description>The dnswl.org rules were re-enabled on 2011-12-19, and probably distributed via sa-update on 2011-12-20 (Tuesday). Because dnswl.org stopped causing</description>
<pubDate>25 Dec  2011 06:47:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170078</link>
</item><item>
<title>whitelist rules should include IP address in output?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m having (yet another) problem getting spam certified by returnpath. (This message is not to complain about returnpath; I&amp;#039;ll do that sometime after</description>
<pubDate>24 Dec  2011 05:54:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Am i sending spam?</title>
<description>http://pastebin.com/78gUdaCj -- Med vänliga hälsningar/Regards Lars Ebeling Rentier http://leopg9.no-ip.org  &amp;quot;I am not young enough to know everyth</description>
<pubDate>23 Dec  2011 13:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170046</link>
</item><item>
<title>dccproc/dccifd error</title>
<description>Hi, I am using perl-5.10.1, amavisd-new 2.7.0, Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.2 and dcc-dccd-1.3.140. When I receive and scan a message with a &amp;#039;X-DCC-xxx-Met</description>
<pubDate>22 Dec  2011 16:18:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170021</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bayes and MySQL - does it actually work?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been trying for a long time to get bayes/mysql to actually work. Running a dedicated server with MySQL. Several servers running SA configured t</description>
<pubDate>21 Dec  2011 06:39:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169962</link>
</item><item>
<title>Upgrade FuzzyOcr Plugin to 3.6.0</title>
<description>Hello folks!, I have a box running freebsd with SpamAssassin and FuzzyOcr plugin, I have noted that it doen&amp;#039;t work fine, the body/description of rule</description>
<pubDate>21 Dec  2011 01:38:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169956</link>
</item><item>
<title>trusted-relay</title>
<description>HI  Ive not checked what other mail we are scanning that also hits this and related rules: RP_MATCHES_RCVD - but when ever I actually do get spam on</description>
<pubDate>21 Dec  2011 00:39:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169954</link>
</item><item>
<title>Spamassassin Moves Mailbox</title>
<description>Hello Folks, Every time I start Spamassassin it moves my mailbox to /var/spool/mail when the correct location is /home/spool/mail . I also get some</description>
<pubDate>20 Dec  2011 18:26:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169940</link>
</item><item>
<title>SURBL down ?</title>
<description>I am not able to lookup surbl Infact the domain surbl.org does not seem to exist at all. [root@pop2 bin]# dig surbl.org +short [root@pop2 bin]# I am</description>
<pubDate>19 Dec  2011 06:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169921</link>
</item><item>
<title>SA Sorbs Usage/Rules</title>
<description>I know some of the discussions in the past about usage of Sorbs RBLs in Spamassassin. The scores today are as follows: score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 #</description>
<pubDate>16 Dec  2011 09:22:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169882</link>
</item><item>
<title>sa-learn and modern spam sizes</title>
<description>Hi all   I found out today that the reason a spammer was giving me pain when trying to learn his spam mails as spam for bayes, was that they are too</description>
<pubDate>16 Dec  2011 04:30:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169871</link>
</item><item>
<title>Apply Bayes learning to all users?</title>
<description>Hi all, I have some spamtraps which get lots of spam. After a few precautions, I use sa-learn to train a single Bayes profile. This profile is used</description>
<pubDate>15 Dec  2011 20:04:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169861</link>
</item><item>
<title>Making a rule -- &amp;quot;to&amp;quot; not matching &amp;quot;for&amp;quot;</title>
<description>A while ago, I made the mistake of trusting a certain small company with my email addresses. They were since compromised and I have had thousands of s</description>
<pubDate>15 Dec  2011 08:57:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169841</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems with Cyrillic spam</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m getting spam with the Subject, Sender personal name and body all written in Cyrillic, but, despite having &amp;quot;ok_locales en fr de&amp;quot; defined in local.c</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2011 16:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169816</link>
</item><item>
<title>Question about why we blocked DNSWL</title>
<description>&amp;gt; well, same thing hapened with some blacklists in the past, which &amp;gt; resulted to high number of FP&amp;#039;s. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; While FNs mean (much/all) mail not to be de</description>
<pubDate>14 Dec  2011 06:17:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169799</link>
</item><item>
<title>Draft of my submission to the PMC for DNSBL Inclusion Criteria</title>
<description>I used several years worth of notes to come up with the information below. It needs more polish and it is my very first rip and shred. I am also c</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 13:56:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169770</link>
</item><item>
<title>solicitations via netsuite.com</title>
<description>greetings how are you folks on this list dealing with unwanted solicitations from companies that spam via netsuite.com ?  -rh</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 12:35:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169768</link>
</item><item>
<title>DNS list inclusion policy (was Re: DNSWL will be disabled by default as of tomorrow)</title>
<description>Hi, Is there a formal policy for including (or excluding) DNS-based lists from SpamAssassin&amp;#039;s default rules? I think that SpamAssassin should not en</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 11:00:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169746</link>
</item><item>
<title>DNS{B,W}Ls and blocking (was Re: DNSWL will be disabled by default as of tomorrow)</title>
<description>I think we need an informational RFC that specifies best-practices for a DNS{B,W}L to inform clients that they have been blocked. For example, a test</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2011 06:21:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169716</link>
</item><item>
<title>score based on a list of domains</title>
<description>Good morning List.    The nice guys at Rhyolite.com have a list of unwelcome domains  http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/unwelcome-a.html&amp;quot;]http:/</description>
<pubDate>12 Dec  2011 23:54:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169686</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: DNSWL will be disabled by default as of tomorrow</title>
<description>(Public apologies to Karste, wrote him instead of the list, mmm... I need to remember to write to the list and not just do a Reply.) What is the best</description>
<pubDate>12 Dec  2011 17:35:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169671</link>
</item><item>
<title>DNSWL will be disabled by default as of tomorrow</title>
<description>Tomorrow&amp;#039;s sa-update will include disabling of the DNSWL rules. If you wish to locally enable them with the same scores which had previously been def</description>
<pubDate>12 Dec  2011 09:58:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169600</link>
</item><item>
<title>sa-updates failures since few days : failed to parse line URIBL_SBL_A</title>
<description>Hi We encountered a problem with sa-update since the last week-end. It fails with this error : config: failed to parse line, skipping, in &amp;quot;/tmp/.spam</description>
<pubDate>12 Dec  2011 03:17:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169584</link>
</item><item>
<title>error on SA learning.</title>
<description>Hi all, I have run a function in my server to learn some email spams and it shows up the following message: Running sa-learn for spam against [/home/</description>
<pubDate>11 Dec  2011 05:16:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169559</link>
</item><item>
<title>sa-update update just got published for the first time since November 2nd</title>
<description>No problems expected, just wanted to let you know about the change in status. The bug: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6702 N</description>
<pubDate>10 Dec  2011 10:42:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169553</link>
</item><item>
<title>BusinessWeek infographic: economics of spam (URL)</title>
<description>BusinessWeek infographic: Behind the drug advertisements in your inbox is a multimillion-dollar mail-order pharmaceutical business; By Karen Weise h</description>
<pubDate>09 Dec  2011 08:19:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169496</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mark all invites as spam</title>
<description>If I want to mark *all* invite mails as spam  linkedin, WAYN , facebook , google+ or anything else.  Is there a global way of doing this</description>
<pubDate>09 Dec  2011 00:20:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169489</link>
</item><item>
<title>French rules</title>
<description>Hi I am looking for French rules with sa-update? Does it exist? Regards Stan</description>
<pubDate>08 Dec  2011 15:51:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169482</link>
</item><item>
<title>several process gocr</title>
<description>Hi, I use the plugin text OCR with spamassassin and amavisd-new Doc: http://www.maiamailguard.com/maia/wiki/OCR  And it happens that there are seve</description>
<pubDate>08 Dec  2011 15:41:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169480</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why not trust that header? And ALL_TRUSTED wrong?</title>
<description>I get this message: [21120] dbg: message: X-Envelope-From header found after 1 or more Received lines, cannot trust envelope-from because my mail go</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2011 08:48:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169435</link>
</item><item>
<title>failed to parse line</title>
<description>Hi, With the following prefs file (taken from http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules) : header LOCAL_DEMONSTRATION_SUBJECT      Subject =~</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2011 07:28:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169429</link>
</item><item>
<title>[SOLVED] Re: USER_IN_BLACKLIST identified but not reported as spam</title>
<description>Quoting &amp;quot;Kevin A. McGrail&amp;quot; &amp;lt;KMcGrail@PCCC.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 12/3/2011 1:46 PM, Bruno Costacurta wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; note : spamassassin version = 3.3.1, called from</description>
<pubDate>03 Dec  2011 12:41:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169397</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: USER IN BLACKLIST identified but not reported as spam</title>
<description>On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:18:00 +0100, Bruno Costacurta wrote: &amp;gt; Something is missing ? restarted spamd after edit local.cf ? &amp;gt; Do I need to configure</description>
<pubDate>03 Dec  2011 10:27:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169394</link>
</item><item>
<title>USER_IN_BLACKLIST identified but not reported as spam</title>
<description>Hello, note : spamassassin version = 3.3.1, called from Postfix as spamd,  platform is Debian stable Squeeze I configured a test blacklist user in</description>
<pubDate>03 Dec  2011 10:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169390</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC 5966 and rbldnsd</title>
<description>http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5966 if rbldnsd does only UDP will not give problems for bind local cache, or isp remote dns servers in forwards ? ho</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2011 06:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169376</link>
</item><item>
<title>matching headers/body of rfc822 attachment</title>
<description>Hello, I have made a few rules to match bodies of e-mail forwarded to our abuse account. they should match if IP from our range appears in the abus</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2011 03:17:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169372</link>
</item><item>
<title>SA assistance needed willing to compensate for a solution</title>
<description>Greetings - I&amp;#039;m at my wits end trying to fix this. First my setup is as follows CentOS 5.7 cPanel WHM 11.30.5 build 2 SA 3.3.1 Pyzor, Razor and DCC</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2011 15:24:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169358</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to check the size of the subject?</title>
<description>Hi all, is there a way to check the size of a subject on a rule? Thanks in advance. Sergio</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2011 11:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169353</link>
</item><item>
<title>Adding a blacklist via sa-update - would you mind?</title>
<description>There is some question among spamassassin developers* on whether or not it is acceptable to increase the network load of spamassassin, by one DNS quer</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2011 09:58:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169349</link>
</item><item>
<title>p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.2_2 error</title>
<description>&amp;quot;FreeBSD + Qmail + Vpopmail&amp;quot; maillog: Dec 1 10:40:46 mail spamd[67490]: spamd: got connection over /var/run/spamd.socket *Dec 1 10:40:46 mail spamd</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2011 04:46:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169337</link>
</item><item>
<title>URIBL_PH_SURBL</title>
<description>Good morning list.    could someone possibly explain how the scoring for ph.surbl.org   works?    I see the following in my spam logs</description>
<pubDate>01 Dec  2011 00:29:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Rules for opt-in mailing list</title>
<description>Hi Bit of an unusal question but ive been getting increasing questions of why spamassasin didnt classify an email as spam. When I look at the mail</description>
<pubDate>30 Nov  2011 04:40:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169281</link>
</item><item>
<title>T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid</title>
<description>I have set up DKIM on our corporate mail hosted by GMail. Google assigned a TXT record and our DNS-provider set it. I send a mail from GMail from the</description>
<pubDate>30 Nov  2011 03:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169279</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bayes database in mysql on multiple servers</title>
<description>Hi all, I have two fedora15 boxes that process mail for a few domains, and recently set up bayes in mysql for each of them. The servers are in geogra</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 21:17:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169267</link>
</item><item>
<title>Martin Gregorie&amp;#039;s portmanteau rule building script</title>
<description>On 11/25/2011 10:13 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: &amp;gt; Subject: [Fwd: Re: How long a rule can be?] My main answers to the original thread were posted there</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 14:22:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169260</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How long can a rule be?</title>
<description>Summary for the impatient: Do not write rules like this. Instead, train Bayes, make sure you&amp;#039;re using DNSBLs. On 11/25/2011 09:49 AM, Sergio wrote: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 12:21:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169258</link>
</item><item>
<title>Freebsd Users: Mail-SpamAssassin update available</title>
<description>For you Freebsd users of SpamAssassin. I have posted an update to p5-Mail-SpamAssassin: Major change includes the back porting of the updated DCC.p</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 04:24:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169249</link>
</item><item>
<title>A SpamAssassin Crash Course for Admins</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m currently working on a crash course for administrators as part of Google Code-in. I would really appreciate it if you could provide any feedba</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 22:28:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169234</link>
</item><item>
<title>using thunderbird - or other client - junk control data</title>
<description>In the recent discussion someone suggested using the junk data that Thunderbird or other email client that have a learning mechanism to make rules</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 16:57:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169220</link>
</item><item>
<title>What is the best RBL list?</title>
<description>Hi, in your opinion, what it will be the best RBL Anti Spam list that could not be left in a server, payed or free? My server is an small server with</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 10:00:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169198</link>
</item><item>
<title>Question for experts....</title>
<description>Which browser(s) treat addresses of the form 178.000235.0000150.000372 as actual addresses? That seems like a serious fault in the browsers. {^_^}</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 13:26:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169175</link>
</item><item>
<title>Has the effect of &amp;#039;__&amp;#039; changed recently?</title>
<description>The SA wiki says: &amp;quot;rules starting with a double undescore are evaluated with no score, and are intended for use in meta rules where you don&amp;#039;t want the</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 08:52:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169159</link>
</item><item>
<title>FP rate (was Re: new paradigm_</title>
<description>On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:04:25 +1000 Noel Butler &amp;lt;noel.butler@ausics.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; my care factor about what some spammy troll like yourself has to say</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 07:31:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169148</link>
</item><item>
<title>Porn rules to share?</title>
<description>Hi, I am getting tons of emails similar to the followings: S:C H #O+O L &amp;quot;G l, R%L P *0 *R N* Re:sexy~argentinean_babe_getting messy-facial b941ecfb97</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 04:17:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/169140</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

