Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 09:03:38 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg > --- I think the files are there... they just won't open... If you move the files, is it able to recreate new ones? Are you running sa-learn as the 12 Feb 2012 07:20:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170820 On 2/10/12 11:04 PM, Linda Walsh wrote: > /home/law/.spamassassin/bayes.lock > bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/law/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: 11 Feb 2012 00:55:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170814 Ishtar:law/bin> process_despam -f Feb 10 20:01:20.916 [3573] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all Feb 10 20:01:20.916 [3573] dbg: logger: logging leve 10 Feb 2012 20:04:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170808 > From: Kevin A. McGrail <KMcGrail@PCCC.com> Hi Kevin, thank you for your reply! But I think you should send it to the list :) >> Is this the right 10 Feb 2012 18:35:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170807 Thanks a lot for your reply > Run: sa-update -D 2>&1| grep DIR > > That will output something like: > > Feb  9 12:08:49.609 [20855] dbg: generic: 10 Feb 2012 18:20:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170806 Den 2012-02-10 14:43, Sharma, Ashish skrev: > My Spamassassin version : 3.3.1 > > Following are sample message headers: remove sare rules set, its de 10 Feb 2012 10:05:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170803 Den 2012-02-10 09:33, Sharma, Ashish skrev: > [.FROM_LOCAL_HEX=0.331, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.282, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, > RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=3.399, T_REMOT 10 Feb 2012 09:57:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170802 Den 2012-02-10 08:15, Sharma, Ashish skrev: > Can you please explain now? Received: from G9W0367G.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.216.193.231) by G5W2 10 Feb 2012 09:43:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170801 My Spamassassin version : 3.3.1 Following are sample message headers: Return-Path: <> Delivered-To: clean-quarantine X-Envelope-From: <b9d02 10 Feb 2012 05:43:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170799 On 02/10/2012 09:33 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote: > Following is the spam score received for cloudemail5.cpgtest.ostinet.net (184.72.247.145) email sendin 10 Feb 2012 01:08:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170798 Following is the spam score received for cloudemail5.cpgtest.ostinet.net (184.72.247.145) email sending setup on one of my Spamassassin email receivin 10 Feb 2012 00:33:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170797 On 02/10/2012 02:16 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote: > The cluster with which I am facing problem is different one. > > The node for which I am getting high 09 Feb 2012 23:51:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170794 Il 08/02/2012 19:18, Benny Pedersen ha scritto: > >> aptitude install python-software-properties >> add-apt-repository ppa:patrickdk/general-lucid >> 09 Feb 2012 23:43:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170793 The cluster with which I am facing problem is different one. The node for which I am getting high spam score has the following details: cloudemail5. 09 Feb 2012 23:16:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170792 The cluster with which I am facing problem is different one. The node for which I am getting high spam score has the following details: cloudemail5. 09 Feb 2012 23:15:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170791 user_prefs won't work for me, because my server only filters messages and then redirects them to an internal server (so I don't have mailboxes here) . 09 Feb 2012 13:22:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170786 Den 2012-02-09 17:59, Bowie Bailey skrev: > It may work, but it solves the wrong problem. The problem is to > blacklist the entire domain, but allow 09 Feb 2012 13:12:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170785 On 02/08, email builder wrote: > Hello, > > I have a server where I never customized any of the SA > rules/tests (SA v.3.3.1).  The server does run s 09 Feb 2012 09:27:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170783 On 2/8/2012 6:53 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Den 2012-02-08 21:07, Rejaine Monteiro skrev: >> blacklist_from *@somedomain.com >> whitelist_to myuser@m 09 Feb 2012 08:59:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170782 Hello, I have a server where I never customized any of the SA rules/tests (SA v.3.3.1).  The server does run sa-update every day.  Is this the right 08 Feb 2012 20:06:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170776 > header __FROM_BADDOMAIN From =~ /some\.com/i > header __FROM_BADDOMAIN_GOOD_TO To =~ /myser\@mydomain\.com/i > meta FROM_BADDOMAIN_UNBLACKLIST_TO ( 08 Feb 2012 16:00:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170775 Den 2012-02-08 21:07, Rejaine Monteiro skrev: > blacklist_from *@somedomain.com > whitelist_to myuser@mydomain.com when you use blacklist_from you mu 08 Feb 2012 15:53:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170774 On 2/8/2012 3:56 PM, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > solved.. (maybe, I will do more tests ...) > > I made this way: > > blacklist_from @domain.com > > 08 Feb 2012 13:22:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170773 got better keeping the original version, only using de meta test... (without blacklist_fom .... ) header __FROM_DOMAIN From =~ /some\.com/i header _ 08 Feb 2012 13:15:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170772 On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:07 -0200, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > > It's not exactly what I need ... I'll try to be clearer (sorry by poor > english) > > 08 Feb 2012 13:01:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170771 solved.. (maybe, I will do more tests ...) I made this way: blacklist_from @domain.com and then, i create a meta test , like this: header __ 08 Feb 2012 12:56:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170770 On 2/8/2012 3:07 PM, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > > It's not exactly what I need ... I'll try to be clearer (sorry by poor > english) > > I need somethin 08 Feb 2012 12:38:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170769 It's not exactly what I need ... I'll try to be clearer (sorry by poor english) I need something like this: blacklist a entire @somedomain but accep 08 Feb 2012 12:07:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170768 > aptitude install python-software-properties > add-apt-repository ppa:patrickdk/general-lucid > aptitude update > aptitude install spamassassin spamc 08 Feb 2012 10:18:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170767 On 02/08/2012 12:22 PM, Joe Sniderman typed hurriedly: > IOW, 196.254.0.0/16 no longer matches as of 3.3 Well, I meant to type 169.254.0.0/16... but 08 Feb 2012 09:34:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170766 On 02/08/2012 08:57 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 2/8/12 6:41 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a mail server setup on an AWS instance 08 Feb 2012 09:22:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170765 On 2/8/12 6:41 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote: > Hi, > > I have a mail server setup on an AWS instance. > > When I am sending mails via this setup to a test 08 Feb 2012 05:57:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170764 Hi, I have a mail server setup on an AWS instance. When I am sending mails via this setup to a test spamassassin setup that acts as an email receive 08 Feb 2012 03:41:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170763 On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 03:04 +0000, Martin Gregorie wrote: > If you cut and paste this example as a file and feed it to your browser, > you should see 08 Feb 2012 01:33:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170762 Il 07/02/2012 11:17, Robert Schetterer ha scritto: > Am 07.02.2012 10:58, schrieb Alessio Cecchi: >> Hi, >> >> does anyone know where I can find spama 07 Feb 2012 23:57:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170760 Il 07/02/2012 11:17, Robert Schetterer ha scritto: > Am 07.02.2012 10:58, schrieb Alessio Cecchi: >> Hi, >> >> does anyone know where I can find spama 07 Feb 2012 22:48:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170759 On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:13 -0500, Joseph Brennan wrote: > Now <style> ... </style> with garbage in it is interesting. That > would never be in real 07 Feb 2012 19:04:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170756 On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Joseph Brennan wrote: > Now <style> ... </style> with garbage in it is interesting. That would > never be in real mail. Or so 07 Feb 2012 18:19:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170754 Martin Gregorie <martin@gregorie.org> wrote: >> > Example: Confirmations from Travelocity contain a 28 KB comment. >> > BUT is that comment between < 07 Feb 2012 17:13:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170753 On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Brian Bebeau wrote: > We have a customer who is a legitimate non-spamming investment advisor. Their outbound disclaimer has the p 07 Feb 2012 16:05:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170752 We have a customer who is a legitimate non-spamming investment advisor. Their outbound disclaimer has the phrase "investment advice" which hits the ru 07 Feb 2012 14:12:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170751 On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:31:17 -0500 "David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com> wrote: > Is there a reason T_FROM_MISSPACED is still only a testing rule? 07 Feb 2012 11:33:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170750 Hi, Is there a reason T_FROM_MISSPACED is still only a testing rule? It seems to trigger on quite a few spams and phishing attacks and hardly any ha 07 Feb 2012 11:31:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170749 Martin Gregorie wrote: > BUT is that comment between<html> and<body> tags in a Travelocity > confirmation? It is in the example mail and, since I've 07 Feb 2012 09:26:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170748 On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:04 -0500, Kris Deugau wrote: > Joseph Brennan wrote: > > > > > >>> body __SR1 /<html>\s{0,2}<!--/ > >>> body __SR2 /-->\s{0,2 07 Feb 2012 09:04:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170747 Joseph Brennan wrote: > > >>> body __SR1 /<html>\s{0,2}<!--/ >>> body __SR2 /-->\s{0,2}<body>/ >> >> does not work since body rules strip html comment 07 Feb 2012 08:04:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170746 >> body __SR1 /<html>\s{0,2}<!--/ >> body __SR2 /-->\s{0,2}<body>/ > > does not work since body rules strip html comments > > with rawbody it igno 07 Feb 2012 07:53:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170745 Mozafar, > Spamassassin version: 3.3.0 > OS: Debian Lenny > SA called by Amavis through its command, so NOT using spamc/spamd. > > I've two separate 07 Feb 2012 07:15:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170744 Hi all Spamassassin version: 3.3.0 OS: Debian Lenny SA called by Amavis through its command, so NOT using spamc/spamd. I've two separate servers: On 07 Feb 2012 05:17:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170743 Am 07.02.2012 10:58, schrieb Alessio Cecchi: > Hi, > > does anyone know where I can find spamassassin 3.3.2 in deb format for > Ubuntu 10.04? > > Th 07 Feb 2012 02:17:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170742 Hi, does anyone know where I can find spamassassin 3.3.2 in deb format for Ubuntu 10.04? Thanks -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS -> http://www.linux.it 07 Feb 2012 01:58:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170741 > body __SR1 /<html>\s{0,2}<!--/ > body __SR2 /-->\s{0,2}<body>/ does not work since body rules strip html comments with rawbody it ignore limit 06 Feb 2012 11:20:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170736 On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 09:57 -0800, Mynabbler wrote: > As I said, sure they are in RBL now. They were not when this message was > delivered. That's the 06 Feb 2012 10:48:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170735 > But, of course, your question is till valid! Having rules in place in > SA > to deal with this kind of attempt at getting around bayes-filtering > 06 Feb 2012 10:40:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170734 On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Benny Pedersen wrote: > >> As I said, sure they are in RBL now. They were not when this message was >> delivered. That's the whol 06 Feb 2012 10:36:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170733 On 2/6/2012 12:57 PM, Mynabbler wrote: > As I said, sure they are in RBL now. They were not when this message was > delivered. Looking at the date/ti 06 Feb 2012 10:35:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170732 > As I said, sure they are in RBL now. They were not when this message > was > delivered. That's the whole point of coming up with a diffent > appro 06 Feb 2012 10:24:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170731 Benny Pedersen wrote: > > 1.0 RCVD_IN_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus CSS > 1.6 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL liste 06 Feb 2012 09:57:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170730 > Let me elaborate with an example: http://pastebin.com/AS6kvLH2 1.0 RCVD_IN_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus CSS 06 Feb 2012 08:14:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170729 I seem to remember we discussed a way to figure out how much HTML comment is in a message, but I am not able to find a decent ruleset that is trying t 06 Feb 2012 07:12:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170728 Folks - please disregard my earlier message re: Exim vs. SA doing the scanning - I read a bit further and found my answers… On Feb 3, 2012, at 6:44 03 Feb 2012 18:47:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170714 Hi Mark, GREAT FIND - thx man. So let me ask, based on reading about Exim just now, it seems that Exim and SpamAssassin work in tandem. The former 03 Feb 2012 18:44:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170713 Antonio, > Hi Mark - you guessed… > So SpamAssassin was working great - still does actually - except that for > some reason, about 2 weeks ago, the s 03 Feb 2012 18:24:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170712 Hi Mark - you guessed… So SpamAssassin was working great - still does actually - except that for some reason, about 2 weeks ago, the subject line rew 03 Feb 2012 12:20:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170711 > Hello SpamAssassin users, > > Does anyone out there have any information regarding two purported "styles" > for SpamAssassin operation - ACL and TR 03 Feb 2012 12:12:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170710 On 2/3/12 2:53 PM, Antonio Leding wrote: > Does anyone out there have any information regarding two purported "styles" for SpamAssassin operation - AC 03 Feb 2012 12:09:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170709 Hello SpamAssassin users, Does anyone out there have any information regarding two purported "styles" for SpamAssassin operation - ACL and TRANSPORT? 03 Feb 2012 11:53:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170708 Version 3.3.1 on Debian Squeeze -- Dogs are tough. I've been interrogating this one for hours and he still won't tell me who's a good boy. simon@k 03 Feb 2012 11:13:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170707 Kris Deugau wrote: > I've adjusted one machine with min-spare and max-spare at 5, the other > min-spare 2 and max-spare 5; but I don't think that's it 03 Feb 2012 10:44:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170706 On 2/3/2012 5:00 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote: > Hi, > > I have an error somewhere in a rule (not that I have added one for > ages so I cannot 03 Feb 2012 07:30:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170703 Hi, I have an error somewhere in a rule (not that I have added one for ages so I cannot fathom how it slipped in). The error message from -D --l 03 Feb 2012 02:00:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170702 ----- Original Message ----- > Rob McEwen wrote: > > > On 1/31/2012 12:40 PM, Phil Daws wrote: > >> Just to follow up we have seen a huge decrease in 03 Feb 2012 00:55:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170701 More data about my enviroment Spamassassin: 3.3.2 OS: CentOS 5 x86 How is SA invoqued: qmail-scanner 2.10 Any idea? Regards Maria ----- Ori 02 Feb 2012 23:30:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170699 On 02/02/2012 18:44, John Hardin wrote: > > > The _MINFP version is apparently performing better, and should > probably replace the base TVD_SPACE_RA 02 Feb 2012 22:29:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170698 On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:51:51 -0200, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: > Example: blacklist_from @orig.com except when rcpt_to is > myboos@mydomain.com freemail 02 Feb 2012 11:45:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170696 Am 02.02.2012 19:51, schrieb Rejaine Monteiro: > Hi list, > > Is there any way to block an entire domain, except for a particular > recipient? > Exam 02 Feb 2012 10:54:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170695 Hi list, Is there any way to block an entire domain, except for a particular recipient? Example: blacklist_from @orig.com except when rcpt_to is myb 02 Feb 2012 10:51:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170694 On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Tom Kinghorn wrote: > Good afternoon List. > > Could anyone elaborate on the following rule. > I have tried searching for an expl 02 Feb 2012 08:44:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170693 RW wrote: >>>> spamd adjusts the number of children when it gets a message from >>>> one of them reporting that it's idle. If you have all the busy > 02 Feb 2012 07:47:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170691 Good afternoon List. Could anyone elaborate on the following rule. I have tried searching for an explanation, without success. TVD_SPACE_RATIO_MINFP 02 Feb 2012 03:29:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170690 Thanks! That worked perfectly: blacklist_subject test On 02/01/2012 09:09 PM, Michael Parker wrote: > On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Miguel Fernand 02 Feb 2012 01:40:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170689 Hello Is it posible to use global & per-user bayes in sql? The intented usage should be the following mail<--->spamassassin<--->generic_rules<--- 02 Feb 2012 01:04:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170688 Rob McEwen wrote: > On 1/31/2012 12:40 PM, Phil Daws wrote: >> Just to follow up we have seen a huge decrease in the amount of SPAM >> received since 02 Feb 2012 00:20:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170685 On 2/1/2012 11:05 PM, Per Jessen wrote: > I would recommend not doing full greylisting, i.e. not for all clients. > Use a set of criteria to greylist 02 Feb 2012 00:15:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170686 On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:56:34 -0500 Kris Deugau wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:36:36 +0000 > > RW wrote: > > > >> spamd adjusts the numb 01 Feb 2012 16:31:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170682 Hi! >> Just to follow up we have seen a huge decrease in the amount of SPAM >> received since we implemented the Invaluement RBLs. Overall spam vol 01 Feb 2012 16:17:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170681 On 1/31/2012 12:40 PM, Phil Daws wrote: > Just to follow up we have seen a huge decrease in the amount of SPAM received since we implemented the Inval 01 Feb 2012 16:15:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170680 RW wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:36:36 +0000 > RW wrote: > >> spamd adjusts the number of children when it gets a message from one >> of them report 01 Feb 2012 13:56:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170679 On Feb 1, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Miguel Fernandes wrote: > Hi! > > I'm just wondering, is there a limitation on the type of rules that can be added to t 01 Feb 2012 13:09:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170678 Miguel Fernandes wrote: > Just tested with this: > > +--------------+---------------------+--------------------+ > | username | preference | value | > 01 Feb 2012 10:37:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170677 On 02/01/2012 07:23 PM, Miguel Fernandes wrote: > Just tested with this: > > +--------------+---------------------+--------------------+ > | username 01 Feb 2012 10:26:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170676 Just tested with this: +--------------+---------------------+--------------------+ | username | preference | value | +----- 01 Feb 2012 10:23:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170675 On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:36:36 +0000 RW wrote: > spamd adjusts the number of children when it gets a message from one > of them reporting that it's idl 01 Feb 2012 10:19:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170674 On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:46:57 -0500 Kris Deugau wrote: > RW wrote: > > As regards the original question I just remembered that something > > like this 01 Feb 2012 09:36:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170673 John Hardin wrote: > That was just a stab in the dark. From your log excerpt SA seems to be > getting wedged when bringing active the last idle child 01 Feb 2012 09:11:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170672 On 02/01/2012 05:52 PM, Kris Deugau wrote: > Miguel Fernandes wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I'm just wondering, is there a limitation on the type of rules that 01 Feb 2012 09:01:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170671 Miguel Fernandes wrote: > Hi! > > I'm just wondering, is there a limitation on the type of rules that can > be added to the SpamassAssin rules table? 01 Feb 2012 08:52:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170670 Hi! I'm just wondering, is there a limitation on the type of rules that can be added to the SpamassAssin rules table? Because adding something like 01 Feb 2012 08:37:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170669 On 2/1/2012 5:56 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 15:17 -0800, John Hardin wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Kris Deugau wrote: >> >>> 01 Feb 2012 08:15:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170667 RW wrote: > As regards the original question I just remembered that something like > this has come up before. IIRC there's a problem with timing-out a 01 Feb 2012 07:46:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/170666