<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SpamAssassin | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>23 Nov  2009 22:56:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [SA] cleanup for DNSBLs</title>
<description>Warren Togami wrote: &amp;gt; On 11/23/2009 07:34 PM, Adam Katz wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Unless there are objections, I&amp;#039;m going to add two tests to my sandbox: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; RCVD_I</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 19:40:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144462</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>On 11/23/2009 05:11 PM, LuKreme wrote: &amp;gt; On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville &amp;lt;philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com &amp;gt; &amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I wa</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 18:15:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144460</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>On 11/23/2009 05:11 PM, LuKreme wrote: &amp;gt; On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville &amp;lt;philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com &amp;gt; &amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I wa</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 18:14:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144459</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: cleanup for DNSBLs</title>
<description>On 11/23/2009 07:34 PM, Adam Katz wrote: &amp;gt; Unless there are objections, I&amp;#039;m going to add two tests to my sandbox: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM, a new (to us)</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 17:10:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144458</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, LuKreme wrote: &amp;gt; On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville &amp;gt; &amp;lt;philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I want to blo</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 16:51:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144457</link>
</item><item>
<title>cleanup for DNSBLs</title>
<description>Unless there are objections, I&amp;#039;m going to add two tests to my sandbox: RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM, a new (to us) DNSBL populated by the same source as the orig</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 16:34:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144456</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>On tir 24 nov 2009 01:11:38 CET, LuKreme wrote &amp;gt; I used it all the time. And you WILL &amp;#039;block&amp;#039; legitimate mail. and thats always sender to decide its</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 16:25:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144455</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:08 -0700, LuKreme wrote: &amp;gt; On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas &amp;lt;uhlar@fantomas.sk&amp;gt;  &amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Yes, why to</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 16:23:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144454</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:05, Philip Prindeville &amp;lt;philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com  &amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I want to block all messages that I&amp;#039;m getting that hav</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 16:11:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144451</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas &amp;lt;uhlar@fantomas.sk&amp;gt;  wrote: &amp;gt; Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers... We&amp;#039;v</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 16:08:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144450</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>OMG I am SO DUMB - I had skip_rbl_checks set in my personal userconf. DUH. Thanks everyone for your helpful suggestions - actually it was working fi</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:41:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144449</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Charles Gregory wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Did you look at the logs you posted? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; NONE of the DN</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:29:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144448</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:46 PM, jdow &amp;lt;jdow@earthlink.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; From: &amp;quot;J.D. Falk&amp;quot; &amp;lt;jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Sent: Monday, 2009/November/23</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:05:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144447</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>From: &amp;quot;J.D. Falk&amp;quot; &amp;lt;jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org&amp;gt; Sent: Monday, 2009/November/23 13:37  On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 13:46:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144446</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: &amp;gt; You should complain to ReturnPath. Iirc, HABEAS used to sue spammers &amp;gt; misusing their te</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 13:37:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144445</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>On 11/23/2009 12:18 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: &amp;gt; Philip Prindeville wrote: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; but as you say, if it can&amp;#039;t tell the difference between &amp;quot;&amp;quot; and</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 11:37:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144444</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>Philip Prindeville wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; but as you say, if it can&amp;#039;t tell the difference between &amp;quot;&amp;quot; and undef, &amp;gt; then that&amp;#039;s an issue. &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  use header ALL to</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 11:18:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144443</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>On 11/23/2009 12:10 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: &amp;gt; Philip Prindeville wrote: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I want to block all messages that I&amp;#039;m getting that have</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 11:15:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144442</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>Philip Prindeville wrote: &amp;gt; Hi. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I want to block all messages that I&amp;#039;m getting that have: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; To: undisclosed recipients: ; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; with no Cc: line. &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 11:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144441</link>
</item><item>
<title>Undisclosed recipients :; -- again</title>
<description>Hi. I want to block all messages that I&amp;#039;m getting that have: To: undisclosed recipients: ; with no Cc: line. Unfortunately, the rule that I have:</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 11:05:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144440</link>
</item><item>
<title>[OT] Massive Crackdown on Internet Drug Traffic</title>
<description>FYI, thought this might be of interest. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:39:46 -0500 From: Knujon Reports &amp;lt;reports@k</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 08:49:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144437</link>
</item><item>
<title>using Data of &amp;quot;Project Honeypot&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Hello, how do i use the data of project honeypot in spamassassin? thx Sebastian</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 06:52:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144436</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>&amp;gt; On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas &amp;lt;uhlar@fantomas.sk&amp;gt;  &amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; You should complain to ReturnPath On 23.11.09 06:40, LuKreme w</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 06:39:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144435</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>Thanks to Matus for the explanation, LuKreme for the suggestion on scoring and Hajdu for the contact details. I am obliged to you and thank you for yo</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 06:34:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144434</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>Or just report it... &amp;quot;Sender Abuse and Complaint Reporting Any concerns or complaints regarding the Return Path Certification program can be submitt</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 05:54:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144432</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>On Nov 23, 2009, at 6:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas &amp;lt;uhlar@fantomas.sk&amp;gt;  wrote: &amp;gt; You should complain to ReturnPath Or just change the scores from -8.</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 05:40:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144431</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>On 23.11.09 12:19, richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m not really familiar with HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI and I&amp;#039;m interested to &amp;gt; know who is behind it, a</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 05:14:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144430</link>
</item><item>
<title>HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not really familiar with HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI and I&amp;#039;m interested to know who is behind it, and how it relates to the Spamassassin project. I&amp;#039;m s</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:19:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144429</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SpamAssassin 3.3</title>
<description>LuKreme wrote: &amp;gt; Is there a roadmap for the release of SA 3.3? &amp;gt;  Probably the best roadmap would be to look at the list of bugs assigned against 3</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 20:55:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144426</link>
</item><item>
<title>SpamAssassin 3.3</title>
<description>Is there a roadmap for the release of SA 3.3? a best guess on when it might be released? A URL I should be reading instead of posting to the list? --</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 19:29:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Custom Rule Location</title>
<description>On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:57 +0000, richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: &amp;gt; Almost, I&amp;#039;m looking to have SA to include one or two extra directories &amp;gt; where one</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 12:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144421</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Custom Rule Location</title>
<description>On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 14:17 -0500, Alex wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; What I&amp;#039;m looking to do is have SA look in these directories in addition &amp;gt; &amp;gt; to the default</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 11:57:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144420</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Custom Rule Location</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; What I&amp;#039;m looking to do is have SA look in these directories in addition &amp;gt; to the default locations. I don&amp;#039;t have a problem putting rules there</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 11:17:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144419</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Custom Rule Location</title>
<description>On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 17:10 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: &amp;gt; man sa-update Thanks, but all that says is making use of: --updatedir Will allow rules t</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 10:09:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144418</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Custom Rule Location</title>
<description>On søn 22 nov 2009 17:00:37 CET, &amp;quot;richard@buzzhost.co.uk&amp;quot; wrote &amp;gt; Is there a way to include these locations into the rules path at all? sa-update a</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 08:10:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144417</link>
</item><item>
<title>Custom Rule Location</title>
<description>I think this may have been answered before, but I can&amp;#039;t find it in the archives. Custom rules can be kept in /etc/spamassassin/whateva.cf files no pr</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 08:00:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144416</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with sa-blacklist</title>
<description>On Samstag, 21. November 2009 Matt Kettler wrote: &amp;gt; SA-blacklist and sa-blacklist-uri are both dead as far as use within &amp;gt; SpamAssassin goes. Thank y</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 13:07:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144408</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Charles Gregory wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Did you look at the logs you posted? &amp;gt; NONE of the DNS tests are being launched on msg 26661.... Yes,</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 12:17:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144407</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with sa-blacklist</title>
<description>Michael Monnerie wrote: &amp;gt; I can&amp;#039;t reach Bill Stearns, so I try at this list: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Dear Bill, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m using the sa-blacklist.reject for postfix since a</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 11:00:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144406</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>Analysis 101: &amp;gt; ..... the rule is correctly loaded, but not run when scanned &amp;gt; but run when I put the message through the command line. Did you lo</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:37:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144403</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:20 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As I&amp;#039;ve already confirmed by including the de</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 17:15:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144400</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:20 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; As I&amp;#039;ve already confirmed by including the debugging log &amp;gt; attachment in my first message, the</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 16:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As I&amp;#039;ve already confirmed by including the debugging log &amp;gt; attachment in my first message, the test rule is loaded, it &amp;gt; expec</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 15:48:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144394</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:56 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Trying your suggestion, I found something</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 15:20:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144393</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 14:56 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Trying your suggestion, I found something rather odd. The &amp;gt; test is not triggered (or does</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 15:11:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144392</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote: &amp;gt; On fre 20 nov 2009 21:07:00 CET, Mark Hedges wrote &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi. I&amp;#039;ve set up my own rbldnsd server. It&amp;#039;s r</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 14:56:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144391</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:29 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi. I&amp;#039;ve set up my own rbldnsd server. It&amp;#039;s</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 12:52:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144389</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On fre 20 nov 2009 21:07:00 CET, Mark Hedges wrote &amp;gt; Hi. I&amp;#039;ve set up my own rbldnsd server. It&amp;#039;s responding to &amp;gt; queries correctly, for example, I</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 12:46:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rbl checks not running</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Mark Hedges wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi. I&amp;#039;ve set up my own rbldnsd server. It&amp;#039;s responding &amp;gt; to queries correctly, for example, I am trying</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 12:29:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144387</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Google feedproxy redirector abuse</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Kenneth Porter wrote: &amp;gt; --On Monday, November 16, 2009 10:27 AM -0800 John Hardin &amp;gt; &amp;lt;jhardin@impsec.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;   meta</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 12:23:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144386</link>
</item><item>
<title>rbl checks not running</title>
<description>Hi. I&amp;#039;ve set up my own rbldnsd server. It&amp;#039;s responding to queries correctly, for example, I am trying to block the server that this message comes fr</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 12:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144385</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: spamassassin or sendmail problems with SPF?</title>
<description>On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Michael Scheidell wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; spf passes, but sendmail is telling you the FWD and RDNS don&amp;#039;t match the &amp;gt; helo string. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; from 12</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 10:33:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144384</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Google feedproxy redirector abuse</title>
<description>--On Monday, November 16, 2009 10:27 AM -0800 John Hardin &amp;lt;jhardin@impsec.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  meta      MANY_GOOG_PROXY   __FEEDPROXY &amp;gt; 5 Got o</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 10:10:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: spamassassin or sendmail problems with SPF?</title>
<description>Michael Scheidell wrote: &amp;gt; Allen Chen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Can somebody help me with this email headers: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; http://pastebin.com/m46bcaf59 &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I highlighted two l</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 09:10:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144382</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: spamassassin or sendmail problems with SPF?</title>
<description>Allen Chen wrote: &amp;gt; Can somebody help me with this email headers: &amp;gt; http://pastebin.com/m46bcaf59 &amp;gt; I highlighted two lines which say: &amp;gt; spamassassin</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 08:26:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144381</link>
</item><item>
<title>spamassassin or sendmail problems with SPF?</title>
<description>Can somebody help me with this email headers: http://pastebin.com/m46bcaf59 I highlighted two lines which say: spamassassin: ... SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PA</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 08:09:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144380</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with sa-blacklist</title>
<description>On 20.11.09 12:47, Michael Monnerie wrote: &amp;gt; I can&amp;#039;t reach Bill Stearns, so I try at this list: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Dear Bill, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m using the sa-blacklist.reject</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 06:33:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144379</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem with sa-blacklist</title>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t reach Bill Stearns, so I try at this list: Dear Bill, I&amp;#039;m using the sa-blacklist.reject for postfix since a long time, but these last days</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:47:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144378</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: rspamd?</title>
<description>If they are from sa, that&amp;#039;s not good; in our case rules == source. On Thursday, November 19, 2009, Adam Katz &amp;lt;antispam@khopis.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; http://ce</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 01:48:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144361</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: expire - theory and practical</title>
<description>On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:12:54 -0800 &amp;quot;R-Elists&amp;quot; &amp;lt;lists07@abbacomm.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; looking for theoretical and practical insight on general multi domai</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 18:10:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144357</link>
</item><item>
<title>rspamd?</title>
<description>http://cebka.pp.ru/trac/wiki/RspamdFeatures contains: &amp;gt; Rspamd is anti-spam system that is designed to work faster than &amp;gt; spamassassin by using event</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 16:31:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144356</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: streamsend</title>
<description>jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; http://www.streamsend.com/returnpath_safelist.htm : &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;SpamAssassin - Safe List rules help give green light to email&amp;quot;</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 16:30:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144355</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: streamsend</title>
<description>jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: &amp;gt; http://www.streamsend.com/returnpath_safelist.htm : &amp;gt; &amp;quot;SpamAssassin - Safe List rules help give green light to email&amp;quot; &amp;gt; N</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 12:42:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144353</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Back on DNSBL overlap</title>
<description>can&amp;#039;t type much as i&amp;#039;ve broken my elbow (oh noes!) -- but we talked in the past about using an LR engine for rescoring. not sure if that got anywhere</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 12:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144352</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: streamsend</title>
<description>jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: &amp;gt; http://www.streamsend.com/returnpath_safelist.htm : &amp;gt; &amp;quot;SpamAssassin - Safe List rules help give green light to email&amp;quot; &amp;gt; N</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 12:20:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144351</link>
</item><item>
<title>streamsend</title>
<description>http://www.streamsend.com/returnpath_safelist.htm : &amp;quot;SpamAssassin - Safe List rules help give green light to email&amp;quot; Not my email though. header J_STRE</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 12:03:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144349</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: expire - theory and practical</title>
<description>R-Elists wrote: &amp;gt; looking for theoretical and practical insight on general multi domain email &amp;gt; hosting type servers... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Q1) on high volume email s</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 10:29:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144348</link>
</item><item>
<title>expire - theory and practical</title>
<description>looking for theoretical and practical insight on general multi domain email hosting type servers... Q1) on high volume email servers, is it wise to e</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 10:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144347</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: More of a philosophical question</title>
<description>J.D. Falk wrote: &amp;gt; Jason Bertoch wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve been hit with that response on a number of occasions. However, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve found that if I reply, poi</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 10:44:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144338</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can I don&amp;#039;t run spamc for an especific recips?</title>
<description>Please keep replies on-list so that others can help and benefit. On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: &amp;gt; i&amp;#039;m launching spamc with qmail-scann</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 09:49:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: More of a philosophical question</title>
<description>Jason Bertoch wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve been hit with that response on a number of occasions. However, &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve found that if I reply, pointing out their obvious</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 09:40:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144336</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can I don&amp;#039;t run spamc for an especific recips?</title>
<description>On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Rejaine Monteiro wrote: &amp;gt; how can i ignores or not run spamc to this destination address ? What is your glue? In other words, h</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 08:47:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144335</link>
</item><item>
<title>can I don&amp;#039;t run spamc for an especific recips?</title>
<description>i have a noreply@address ( &amp;gt; /dev/null ) and i don&amp;#039;t want scan any mail to this address.. (to not high load cpu) i put noreply address to all_spam_</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 08:32:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144334</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to check if SpamAssassin works</title>
<description>Michael Schmid wrote: &amp;gt; Hi!I checked if SpamAssassin works with GTUBE. GTUBE was recognised... So &amp;gt; far, so good.Then I added to one cf-File a Test li</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 06:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144331</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to check if SpamAssassin works</title>
<description>Hi!I checked if SpamAssassin works with GTUBE. GTUBE was recognised... So far, so good.Then I added to one cf-File a Test like this:**********header</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 06:03:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144322</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ebay date field is wrong</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 21:32 -0900, Royce Williams wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Per Jessen &amp;lt;per@computer.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I was just wond</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 05:14:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144321</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ebay date field is wrong</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Per Jessen &amp;lt;per@computer.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I was just wondering if anyone had mentioned this to ebay: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Date: Sun, 15</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 22:32:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144311</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Back on DNSBL overlap</title>
<description>On 11/16/2009 07:26 PM, Adam Katz wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; My hypothesis, which I&amp;#039;ve anecdotally proven on my own deployment, is &amp;gt; that the flaws are repeated as we</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 19:22:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144302</link>
</item><item>
<title>Back on DNSBL overlap</title>
<description>Warren reported: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; SPAM%  HAM%  RANK RULE &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 12.8342% 0.0021% 0.94 RCVD_IN_PSBL * &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 12.3053% 0.0026% 0.94 RCVD_IN_XBL &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 31.2499% 0.0827% 0.87 R</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 16:26:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144298</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: balancechecker.zip balancechecker.exe</title>
<description>On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: &amp;gt; Is anyone else seeing an influx of spam with a zip attachment &amp;gt; balancechecker.zip? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This con</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 15:37:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144296</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ebay date field is wrong</title>
<description>Warren Togami wrote: &amp;gt; On 11/16/2009 03:04 PM, Per Jessen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I was just wondering if anyone had mentioned this to ebay: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Date: Sun, 15 Nov</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 12:26:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144293</link>
</item><item>
<title>ebay date field is wrong</title>
<description>I was just wondering if anyone had mentioned this to ebay: Date: Sun, 15 Nov 09 16:42:23 GMT-0700 will hit INVALID_DATE.  /Per Jessen, Zürich</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 12:20:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144291</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ebay date field is wrong</title>
<description>On 11/16/2009 03:04 PM, Per Jessen wrote: &amp;gt; I was just wondering if anyone had mentioned this to ebay: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Date: Sun, 15 Nov 09 16:42:23 GMT-0700 &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 12:07:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144292</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Google feedproxy redirector abuse</title>
<description>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Kenneth Porter wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve been seeing pill spam with lots of identical URIs pointing at &amp;gt; feedproxy.google.com over the last</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 10:27:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144290</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Cluster/Clone spamassassin node</title>
<description>ewreg wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Good morning, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am preparing env with more then 10 node of spamassassin machine. I &amp;gt; am wonder what kind of software do you us</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 10:20:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144287</link>
</item><item>
<title>Google feedproxy redirector abuse</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been seeing pill spam with lots of identical URIs pointing at feedproxy.google.com over the last week or two. All the URI&amp;#039;s seem to be this (le</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 08:54:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144288</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: balancechecker.zip balancechecker.exe</title>
<description>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, LuKreme wrote: &amp;gt; On 16-Nov-2009, at 08:29, Ned Slider wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ralph, I entirely agree as a l</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 08:19:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144286</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Cluster/Clone spamassassin node</title>
<description>I use dd to duplicate hard drives when needed. dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/sdc bs=1M for example. It&amp;#039;s probably in every distribution. I use rsync to syn</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 08:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144285</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: balancechecker.zip balancechecker.exe</title>
<description>On 16-Nov-2009, at 08:29, Ned Slider wrote: &amp;gt; richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ralph, I entirely agree as a logical human, but end users are *not* &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:58:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144284</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DNSBL Comparison 20091114</title>
<description>On 16-Nov-2009, at 07:00, Justin Mason wrote: &amp;gt; First -- my name is not Jim. Secondly -- I don&amp;#039;t care what Spamhaus &amp;gt; does, I&amp;#039;m asking what you sugg</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:54:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144283</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: balancechecker.zip balancechecker.exe</title>
<description>richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: &amp;gt; Ralph, I entirely agree as a logical human, but end users are *not* &amp;gt; logical users. Many probably think &amp;#039;Hey, this fi</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:29:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144282</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: balancechecker.zip balancechecker.exe</title>
<description>richard@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb: &amp;gt; On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 00:07 +0100, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; richard@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Is anyone e</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:20:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144278</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: balancechecker.zip balancechecker.exe</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:08 +0100, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote: &amp;gt; richard@buzzhost.co.uk schrieb: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 00:07 +0100, Ralph Borne</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:14:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144281</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DNSBL Comparison 20091114</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:00 +0000, Justin Mason wrote: &amp;gt; First -- my name is not Jim. Secondly -- I don&amp;#039;t care what Spamhaus &amp;gt; does, I&amp;#039;m asking what</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:12:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144280</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DNSBL Comparison 20091114</title>
<description>First -- my name is not Jim. Secondly -- I don&amp;#039;t care what Spamhaus does, I&amp;#039;m asking what you suggest SpamAssassin do to measure FPs. --j. On Mon,</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:00:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144279</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Cluster/Clone spamassassin node</title>
<description>&amp;gt; On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 01:01:30AM -0800, ewreg wrote: &amp;gt; ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have done some research and I find that systemimager should be the one. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; But</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 03:24:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144277</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DNSBL Comparison 20091114</title>
<description>On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: &amp;gt; You neglected to trim my name from your post making it look like the hrmm... that is not how al</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 03:03:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144276</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Good reasons to dont use RBLs</title>
<description>Hi! On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 21:41 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: [...] &amp;gt; Again me, Well, in the security scope i use a principle that states t</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 02:51:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144275</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Cluster/Clone spamassassin node</title>
<description>Hi ewreg, list, On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 01:01:30AM -0800, ewreg wrote: ... &amp;gt; I have done some research and I find that systemimager should be the one</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 02:36:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144274</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Cluster/Clone spamassassin node</title>
<description>&amp;gt; You may want to let us in on the details and we may be of better help. Okay, so: I&amp;#039;m preparing ~10 machine of Debian Lenny with spamassassin on th</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 01:01:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144273</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
