Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 26 Nov 2009 06:14:22 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: >> richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 26 Nov 2009 04:20:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144571 On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 08:57 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote: > >> > ipta 26 Nov 2009 01:24:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144570 richard@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote: >> > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP >> >> Nah, use REJEC 26 Nov 2009 00:20:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144566 Is there a way to limit the pattern size in rules created by seek-phrases-in-log ? I'd like to avoid creating rules using patterns with +200 charact 25 Nov 2009 23:59:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144567 Hi, > not relevant to Spamassassin, is it? > > if you have to go way off topic at pleas be considerat and add an OT: tag to > the subject..  > /dev/n 25 Nov 2009 15:34:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144565 On 11/25/2009 11:29 PM, Alex wrote: >>> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP >>> >> Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add: >> 25 Nov 2009 15:08:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144564 >> iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP >> > Very good. That was nearly funny :-) Why don't you add: > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j DRO 25 Nov 2009 14:29:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144563 Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it > works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot 25 Nov 2009 12:58:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144560 Alex pisze: > I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it > works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, 25 Nov 2009 11:49:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144559 On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 14:04 -0500, Alex wrote: > > iptables -A FIREWALL -s 127.0.0.0/8 -j DROP > > Nah, use REJECT so you get that immediate satisfac 25 Nov 2009 11:42:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/144558