Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: devel

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Dec 30, 2003, 12:16 AM

Post #1 of 9 (211 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

duncf [at] debian changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.70 |2.62

------- Additional Comments From duncf [at] debian 2003-12-29 22:21 -------
This seems to be a significant problem. Especially because the error message
(contains control chars) is particularly problematic.

Lets try to get this for 2.62

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 1, 2004, 8:55 PM

Post #2 of 9 (206 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

------- Additional Comments From duncf [at] debian 2004-01-01 19:00 -------
Hmmm... unfortunately we can not accept this patch without having a CLA on file.

Could you please fill out the form available below:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla.pdf
and print/sign/fax or mail to the ASF or print/sign/scan/email to
asf-project [at] spamassassin

Unfortunately, we need this to be able to apply this patch.

Thanks.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 7, 2004, 8:47 PM

Post #3 of 9 (206 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

------- Additional Comments From jm [at] jmason 2004-01-07 18:52 -------
Created an attachment (id=1664)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1664&action=view)
fix

no need -- I just clean-roomed it. This patch will ignore empty headers (with
a debug message noting that they were ignored).

Devs -- +/-1s pls.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 7, 2004, 8:51 PM

Post #4 of 9 (206 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

------- Additional Comments From felicity [at] kluge 2004-01-07 18:56 -------
+1

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 7, 2004, 8:52 PM

Post #5 of 9 (207 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

jm [at] jmason changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #1664 is|0 |1
obsolete| |

------- Additional Comments From jm [at] jmason 2004-01-07 18:57 -------
Created an attachment (id=1665)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1665&action=view)
more correct fix

Actually, scratch that.

This is more appropriate. This emulates what SA 2.50 and earlier did -- which
was to allow an empty "User" string. I suggest we should emulate the earlier
behaviour, even if it seems a little odd ;)

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 7, 2004, 9:04 PM

Post #6 of 9 (207 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

------- Additional Comments From duncf [at] debian 2004-01-07 19:09 -------
+1

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 7, 2004, 9:08 PM

Post #7 of 9 (206 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

------- Additional Comments From felicity [at] kluge 2004-01-07 19:13 -------
-0.1 the warnings are wrong if empty which I think will just lead to confusion. I'd rather have a ''
case, then followed by the RE version.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 7, 2004, 9:13 PM

Post #8 of 9 (206 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842

------- Additional Comments From felicity [at] kluge 2004-01-07 19:18 -------
+1

doh. jm pointed out the ! in the statements, so disregard my last note please. <sigh> I need
more sleep.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jan 7, 2004, 9:27 PM

Post #9 of 9 (207 views)
Permalink

[Bug 2842] spamc passes empty User: on to spamd [In reply to]

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads