lists.michael.monnerie at is
Aug 24, 2012, 3:58 AM
Post #2 of 5
(152 views)
Permalink
|
Am Mittwoch, 22. August 2012, 07:34:23 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
> What is the score line in 72_active.cf that you show for
> FROM_12LTRDOM?
>
> 3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org/72_scores.cf:score
> FROM_12LTRDOM 0.099 0.098 0.099 0.098
Yes, that's what's there now. It was crazy high (3.7), hope it stays
down now.
And darxus answered to the other list:
> As to what I believe is your objection to the existence of the rule:
> I understand, I sympathize. There are rules against doing other
> entirely valid things that I do, for example not having a "real name"
> in my From address. But these rules exist because they might
> correspond highly to spam, and are very carefully automatically scored
> accordingly (when we have enough data). It's a complicated subject.
True. Those 0.1 points for 12 letter domains will at least fix *my*
problems, don't know for others, though.
> Yup, that's exactly why we need more masscheck data, and we all know
> it. Basing most SA scores on fifteen people's email who are not
> representative of all email users (we're all computer geeks who mostly
> speak English) is *bad*. Please fix it
Make an autoreporter in SA, sending e-mails with >15 or so points to a
central report address. Must be enabled, user must subscribe to get an
id, that id is reportet with the mail. You'll get a lot of reports if
subscription is made easy.
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531
|
signature.asc
