Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: devel

[Bug 6815] Use of uninitialized value $origip

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jul 15, 2012, 1:47 PM

Post #1 of 3 (208 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6815] Use of uninitialized value $origip

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6815

Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgrail [at] pccc> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |kmcgrail [at] pccc
Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgrail [at] pccc> ---
Based on the information in the thread, SVN includes a check if $result is
defined as well as $origip.

The fact that a distribution uses an older version of SpamAssassin is not a
concern for the project, sorry.

You might want to consider maintaining SA outside of your Debian package
management.

Regards,
KAM

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jul 15, 2012, 2:22 PM

Post #2 of 3 (198 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6815] Use of uninitialized value $origip [In reply to]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6815

Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss [at] iguanasuicide> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bss [at] iguanasuicide

--- Comment #2 from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss [at] iguanasuicide> ---
Sorry for the noise. What I saw of the thread didn't say the patch had made it
into SVN, but rather than an issue should be opened so that it would be added
to SVN. Apparently the patch was included in r931606, thanks!

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jul 15, 2012, 2:27 PM

Post #3 of 3 (199 views)
Permalink

[Bug 6815] Use of uninitialized value $origip [In reply to]

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6815

--- Comment #3 from Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgrail [at] pccc> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sorry for the noise. What I saw of the thread didn't say the patch had made
> it into SVN, but rather than an issue should be opened so that it would be
> added to SVN. Apparently the patch was included in r931606, thanks!

No worries!

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads