KMcGrail at PCCC
Jun 27, 2012, 12:12 PM
Post #16 of 85
Thanks. This is a good time to mention that if you have a good feed for
Ham or Spam and don't want the trouble of setting up your own Masscheck,
Alex Broens, one of our committers, has the hardware to grind through it
all and has offered to set things up. I highly recommend it knowing the
data is safe and will benefit lots of anti-spam endeavors.
On 6/27/2012 3:07 PM, darxus [at] chaosreigns wrote:
> On 06/27, darxus [at] chaosreigns wrote:
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2012-06-22.
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2012-06-22.
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-06-22.
>> 20120627: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120627
>> 20120627: Spam: 59326, Ham: 109540
>> 20120623: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120623
>> 20120623: Spam: 246602, Ham: 119126
> Added the requested threshold checking. These are two separate alerts.
> The rule update check is is based on DNS records, and the threshold checks
> are based on http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/ . If either one failes, it'll
> send an email. If the update check fails, but the threshold checks don't
> fail, it'll still include the ham / spam counts. If the threshold check
> fails, but the update check doesn't, it won't mention the last dates of
> When run on a Saturday, it'll only do one threshold check. When run any
> other day, it'll check thresholds for the current day, and the last
> Saturday / net / weekly run, because I believe score generation requires
> both of them to be above the ham and spam thresholds.
*Kevin A. McGrail*
Peregrine Computer Consultants Corporation
3927 Old Lee Highway, Suite 102-C
Fairfax, VA 22030-2422
703-359-9700 x50 / 800-823-8402 (Toll-Free)
KMcGrail [at] PCCC <mailto:kmcgrail [at] pccc>