advax at triumf
May 14, 2012, 11:49 AM
Post #3 of 3
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Re: Missing rules in "Tests performed" docs
[In reply to]
> As much as I apprecate all your wiki entries, I worry about the long-term
> maintainability of this AND whether your talents are better suited to other
> For example, what about just adding a wiki url to the rules that need a
> longer description than the current describe provides rather than try and
> have a page for every rule?
Yes, that probably makes more sense. I just got on a roll a couple of
As a user of the ruleset document I found it very annoying that most of
the Wiki links were broken, which suggests to a casual visitor that all
of them are broken. I wanted to point someone to the ruleset page to
explain why their mail to me had been ignored (filed under spam), and
having a broken link against most of the rules in question made it
The rulset document really needs to be generated cleanly so that
only valid Wiki pages have a link.
Incidentally, it seems that all the "meta" rules are missing from the
auto-generated rulset page. It's reasonable to hide the sub-components,
but not the rules that appear in tagged mail headers.
Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada