bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla
Feb 9, 2010, 11:14 AM
Post #1 of 8
(853 views)
Permalink
|
|
[Bug 6325] FH_HAS_XID Poor S/O, strong score.
|
|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6325
Adam Katz <antispam [at] khopis> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |antispam [at] khopis
--- Comment #1 from Adam Katz <antispam [at] khopis> 2010-02-09 11:14:38 UTC ---
Probably one of the faults of using a genetic algorithm; too many generations
will produce a little inbreeding and some unexpected results on a few children,
too few generations will produce something immature. I think it makes perfect
sense that something like this, which hits almost no messages, fell through the
cracks.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20100208-r907584-n/FH_HAS_XID/detail
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
0 0.0060 0.0042 0.586 0.50 3.30 FH_HAS_XID
As to how the automated processes even keep it in the published ruleset (let
alone evade the hand-set score), that's a different puzzle.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
|
